Comparative Study of Governance Information Systems for Scientific Research

Authors

  • Khaoula Benmoussa National School of Applied Sciences of Tetouan.
  • Majida Laaziri National School of Applied Sciences of Tetouan
  • Samira Khoulji National School of Applied Sciences of Tetouan
  • Kerkeb Mohamed Larbi Faculty of Sciences of Tetouan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/tmlai.54.3426

Abstract

The research and innovation effort is a major asset in international economic competition. Research and technological development are key areas to achieve this, contributing to economic growth and job creation. In order to achieve the objective of becoming the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world, several government have developed in recent years information systems to manage their scientific research.

As part of the development of instruments to support the strategic management of research at an institution, in particular a university, the design of an information system that meets the requirements of a high level of operational, tactical and strategic institutional authorities seems paramount. International models of research governance or simply the remarks of faculty-researchers at universities help to build a performance management information system.

In this article we will present a comparative study between the information systems of scientific research, in particular the Chile Research Management System (SGI) and the Argentine Science and Technology Information System (SICyTAR), Scientific Information System of Andalusia Spain (SICA), GRAAL of France (management of research data, application of laboratory activities) and others.

References

(1) R.Claudia, N.José, S.Samaly, S.Cabrera Francisco, Fernández Juan Antonio, Chaichio Juan Antonio, ‘Sistema de Información Científica de Andalucía: una herramienta para la evaluación y gestión de los resultados de la actividad científica’,31 may.2006. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/11880141.pdf

(2) l.manderieux, ‘guía práctica para la creación y la gestiónde oficinas de transferencia de tecnología en universidades y centros de investigación de américa latina’, June 2011.

(3) F. Palomo, Carlos G. Veloso, y Rodolfo F. Schmal, ‘Sistema de Gestión de la Investigación en la Universidad de Talca, Chile’, InformationTechnology ,Vol. 18 N1 – 2007, pp. 97-106.

(4) J. Ferrer, C. Clemenza, ‘Gestión de la investigación universitaria: Un paradigma no concluido’, Multiciencias, vol. 6, num. 2, mayAugust, 2006, pp. 188-193.

(5) F.Manuel Solís Cabrera, ‘El sistema de información científica de Andalucía, una experiencia pionera en España’,2006.

(6) Scientific Information System of Andalusia (SICA) [online] Available:https://sica2.cica.es

(7) A.Bollini, M.Mennielli, S.Mornati, DT.Palmer,’ IRIS: Supporting & Managing the Research Life-cycle’, Universal Journal of Educational Research, vol. 4 n. 4, 2016, p. 738 – 743.

(8) Integrated Management and Evaluation System (SIGEVA) [online] Available: http://sigeva.conicet.gov.ar

(9) [9] Management System for Research (SGI) [online] Available: http://sgi.utalca.cl/directorio_new.php

(10) Moroccan Information System for Scientific Research (SIMArech) [online] Available:http://www.sirech.uae.ma/portail/public/index.php

Downloads

Published

2017-09-01

How to Cite

Benmoussa, K., Laaziri, M., Khoulji, S., & Mohamed Larbi, K. (2017). Comparative Study of Governance Information Systems for Scientific Research. Transactions on Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.14738/tmlai.54.3426

Issue

Section

Special Issue : 1st International Conference on Affective computing, Machine Learning and Intelligent Systems

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>