Supporting Digital Innovations By Interdisciplinary Entrepreneurial Learning

Main Article Content

Ileana Hamburg

Abstract

Digitalization signifies transformational or disruptive implications of digital technologies for businesses (new business and work models, new types of products/services, new types of customer).


Digital technologies support new forms of innovation and entrepreneurial initiatives which hold implications at regional/national and societal and influence educators, policy making entities and other stakeholders.


The formation of the entrepreneur as a person for digital transformation is important and considered, in a large part, to be due to learning. Entrepreneurship is “a process of new value creation” and digital entrepreneurship is understood as “a subcategory of entrepreneurship in which some or all of what would be physical in a traditional organization has been digitized”.


Existing research on the digitalization of innovation and entrepreneurship refers mostly to specific fields or disciplines (e.g., marketing, economics, information systems, operations, strategy) and arguably, limited effort has been spent so far on adopting a more interdisciplinary view of the underlying issues. Disruptive innovation and entrepreneurs are strongly connected. Entrepreneurs are often the ones that develop new products or services that change an entire industry and  disruptive innovation  has the potential to improve student/employees outcomes also during their entrepreneurial education and training. Particularly it happens by breaking boundaries for an interdisciplinary entrepreneurial learning.


After the Introduction, the paper includes results of literature review and of interviews the author done with entrepreneurs within some European projects about different forms of innovation and entrepreneurship, particularly digital disruptive innovation and entrepreneurship.


A review of literature about entrepreneurial learning and basis components, which characterize it, are given in part 3. It includes also experience of the author in teaching and training entrepreneurs.


The last part of the paper presents some interdisciplinary new approaches within entrepreneurial learning oriented to disruptive, digital innovation and digital entrepreneurship.  Developments within a European project with the participation of the author are also given.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hamburg, I. (2020). Supporting Digital Innovations By Interdisciplinary Entrepreneurial Learning. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 7(4), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.74.8046
Section
Articles

References

Bailetti, T. (2012). Technology Entrepreneurship: Overview, Definition, and Distinctive Aspects. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(2): 5–12. http://timreview.ca/article/520
Beckman, C. M., Eisenhardt, K., Kotha, S., Meyer, A., & Rajagopalan, N. (2012). Technology Entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6(2): 89–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1134
Becker, M. C. (2004). 'Organizational Routines: A Review of the Literature.' Industrial and Corporate Change, 13 (4): 643-678.
Becker, M. C. and Knudsen, C. (2009). 'Schumpeter and the Organization of Entrepreneurship'. The Oxford Handbook of Sociology and Organization Studies: Classical Foundations. P. S. Adler. Oxford, Oxford University Press: 307-326.
Boix Mansilla, V. & Duraising, E. (2007). Targeted assessment of students’ interdisciplinary work: An empirically grounded framework proposal. Journal of Higher Education, 78(2), 215-237.
Brockhaus, R.H. (1982), “The psychology of the entrepreneur”, Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 39-56.
Burtch, G., Carnahan, S., Greenwood, B., (2018). Can you gig it? An empirical examination of the gig economy and entrepreneurship. Manage. Sci. 64 (12), 5461–5959
Christensen, C.M., Horn, M.B., Johnson, C.W. & A .COM (firm). “Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns”, McGraw-Hill, New York. 2008
Deakins, D. and Freel, M. (1998). 'Entrepreneurial Learning and the Growth Process in SMEs.' The Learning Organization, 5 (3): 144-155Deakins, D., O’Neill, E., et al. (2000). 'Executive Learning in Entrepreneurial Firms and the Role of External Directors.' Education + Training, 42 (4/5): 317-325.
Dierkes, M. (2001). Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Easterby-Smith, M. and Lyles, M. A. (2003). The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management. Oxford, Blackwell.
European Commission (2015). Digital Entrepreneurship Monitor. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/dem/monitor/statistics#/home
Feldman, M. S. and Pentland, B. T. (2003). 'Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change.' Administrative Science Quarterly, 48 (1): 94118.
Ferreira, J. J. M., Ferreira, F. A. F., Fernandes, C. I. M. A. S., Jalali, M. S., Raposo, M. L., & Marques, C. S. (2016). What Do We [Not] Know About Technology Entrepreneurship Research? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(3): 713–733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-015-0359-2
Foss, N. and Mahnke, V. (2002). Competence, Governance, and Entrepreneurship: Advances in Economic Strategy Research. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Gions, F., & Oo, P. (2017). How Crowdsourcing and Crowdfunding are Redefining Innovation
Management. In A. Brem & E. Viardot (Eds.), Revolution of Innovation Management: 43–70. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57475-6_3
Golding, C. (2009). Integrating the disciplines: Successful interdisciplinary subjects. Centre for the Study of Higher Education. Available in electronic form http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/ resources_teach/curriculum_design/docs/Interdisc_Guide.pdf
Hamburg, I., O'Brien, E., Vladut, G. (2018). Workplace-oriented research and mentoring of entrepreneurs: cooperation university - industry. Archives of business research, no. 6, 243-25.
Hamburg, I., O'Brien, E., Öz, F. (2019): Chapter 2: Entrepreneurship & research skills in SMEs. In: Dirksen, Daan: The power of entrepreneurship. New York: Nova Science Publishers, p.45-76
Hamburg, I. (2019): Implementation of a digital workplace strategy to drive behavior change and improve competencies. In: Strategy and behaviors in the digital economy strategy and behaviors in the digital economy. London: IntechOpen, 16 p
Hull, C.E., Hung, Y.-T.C., Hair, N., Perotti, V. and DeMartino, R. (2007), “Taking advantage of digital opportunities: a typology of digital entrepreneurship”, International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organizations, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 290-303
Katz, R., Koutroumpis, P., Martin Callorda, F., (2014). Using a digitization index to measure the economic and social impact of digital agendas. Info 16 (1), 32–44Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs; London, Prentice-Hall.
Landreth, H. and Colander, D. (1994), History of Economic Thought, 3rd ed., Houghton Mifflin, Toronto
Langemo, B. (2018). An Interdisciplinary Approach to Creating Entrepreneurial Learning Environments. The NISOD Papers, 9, 2018.
Le Dinh, T., Vu, M.C. and Ayayi, A. (2018), “Towards a living lab for promoting the digital entrepreneurship process”, International Journal of Entrepreneurship, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 1-17
LERU (2016), Interdisciplinarity and the 21st century research-intensive university. 2016, p 7):
Levenburg, N.M., Lane, P.M. & Schwarz, T.V. (2006). Interdisciplinary dimensions in entrepreneurship. Journal of Education for Business, 81(5), 275-281.
Mäkinen, H. (2002). 'Intra-Firm and Inter-Firm Learning in the Context of Start-up Companies.' The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 3 (1): 35-43.
McClelland, D.C. (1961), The Achieving Society, D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc., Princeton,
.
Miller, D. (1983), “The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms”, Management Science, Vol. 29 No. 7, pp. 770-91.
Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A., Song, M., (2017). Digital innovation management: reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. Mis Q. 41 (1), 223–238.
Nambisan, S., Zahra, A., Luo, Y., (2019). Global platforms and ecosystems: implications for O’Brien, E., Carroll, L. (2015). A report on how problem-based learning and ICT can support SMEs in Europe. Retrieved from
http://www.archimedes2014.eu/doc/reports/European%20report%20on%20SMEs.pdf
Rae, D. and Carswell, M. (2001). 'Towards a Conceptual Understanding of Entrepreneurial Learning.' Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 8 (2): 150-158.
Schumpeter, J.A. (1950), Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, 3rd ed., Harper & Row, New York, NY.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>