The Effectiveness of Inquiry-Group Based Blended Learning Management System on High School Physics of High School Students of North Sumatera-Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.912.13577Keywords:
Blended Learning, Learning Outcomes, Management Systems, Inquiry GroupAbstract
The merging of these systems is based on the effectiveness and efficiency of the learning and teaching processes. Offline teaching which is combined with online makes the teaching and learning processes more effective in the way the students have more effective discussions and enable students to collaborate to present the few topics being discussed. This type of learning and teaching will provide flexibility for schools to adapt to government policies to prevent students from being too crowded by dividing students into offline and online groups. Blended learning will also make learning more effective and efficient where students can study more independently as well as have access to learning material resources. This system can deepen the mastery of material through more exercise by exposing to learning resources that are available on the internet which are unlimited. Misunderstood blended learning and teaching models and they think of blended learning as a model of learning. Several studies use blended learning with conventional teaching methods. Some works have also combined blended learning with various models of teaching. A choice of a suitable model of learning on a specific topic is also required. It depends on the learning outcomes. Different models of learning have different direct and nurturant effects. This work tries to look at A compact blended learning mode that was used in this work the Flip model with 50% Face to Face and 50% online alternating. This is required to split the students into two groups by reducing the number of students present at school at the same time. The target of this research is to see the effectiveness of an inquiry-group based blended learning management system (IGBLMS). Analysis of the results of the study was carried out using N-gain analysis and non-parametric statistics. Non-parametric statistics are used to analyze in detail the specific effects of processes and outcomes. This analysis will show in detail the direct impact of the research design. The conclusion that can be reached is that the effectiveness of blended learning carried out in supporting learning activities is effective learning even with moderate criteria. This makes a breakthrough in learning to be able to support learning activities without reducing the existence of learning with pre-existing systems.
References
B. Thomas, “Education and training of medical physicists in south East Asia: Accomplishments and challenges,” Biomed. Imaging Interv. J., 2011, doi: 10.2349/biij.7.3.e23.
S. X. Zhao, A. M. Tan, S. Yu, and X. Xu, “Analyzing the research funding in physics: The perspective of production and collaboration at institution level,” Phys. A Stat. Mech. its Appl., 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2018.04.072.
G. Asiksoy and F. Özdamli, “Flipped classroom adapted to the ARCS model of motivation and applied to a physics course,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., 2016, doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2016.1251a.
N. Nadrah, I. Tolla, M. S. Ali, and M. Muris, “The Effect of Cooperative Learning Model of Teams Games Tournament (TGT) and Students’ Motivation toward Physics Learning Outcome,” Int. Educ. Stud., 2017, doi: 10.5539/ies.v10n2p123.
R. D. Handayani, “ANALYSIS OF INSTRINSIC AND EXTRINSIC MOTIVATION OF PHYSICS-TEACHER STUDENT CANDIDATES,” J. Kependidikan Penelit. Inov. Pembelajaran, 2017, doi: 10.21831/jk.v1i2.8449.
Z. Hazari, R. Dou, G. Sonnert, and P. M. Sadler, “Examining the relationship between informal science experiences and physics identity: Unrealized possibilities,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., 2022, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.010107.
J. Mercado, “A Phenomenological Study on Students’ Experiences in Learning Physics in an Online Class,” Sci. Educ. Int., 2021, doi: 10.33828/sei.v32.i4.14.
S. L. Watulak, “Reflection in action: Using inquiry groups to explore critical digital literacy with pre-service teachers,” Educ. Action Res., 2016.
T. Vũ Thị Cẩm, “Science, Technology and Innovation,” VNU J. Sci. Policy Manag. Stud., 2017, doi: 10.25073/2588-1116/vnupam.4120.
C. Müller and T. Mildenberger, “Facilitating flexible learning by replacing classroom time with an online learning environment: A systematic review of blended learning in higher education,” Educational Research Review. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100394.
R. Rabiman, M. Nurtanto, and N. Kholifah, “Design and development E-learning system by learning management system (Lms) in vocational education,” Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res., 2020.
B. Saputro, H. S. Tortop, M. Zuhri, Mansur, and M. Saerozi, “The effectiveness of the learning management system of saqural learning application on the scientific interpretation learning outcomes,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., 2021, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v10i1.27677.
C. Dziuban, C. R. Graham, P. D. Moskal, A. Norberg, and N. Sicilia, “Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., 2018, doi: 10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5.
A. Kumar et al., “Blended Learning Tools and Practices: A Comprehensive Analysis,” IEEE Access, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3085844.
N. Shamsuddin and J. Kaur, “Students’ learning style and its effect on blended learning, does it matter?,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., 2020, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v9i1.20422.
S. M. Azizi, N. Roozbahani, and A. Khatony, “Factors affecting the acceptance of blended learning in medical education: application of UTAUT2 model,” BMC Med. Educ., 2020, doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02302-2.
N. Wang, J. Chen, M. Tai, and J. Zhang, “Blended learning for Chinese university EFL learners: learning environment and learner perceptions,” Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn., 2021, doi: 10.1080/09588221.2019.1607881.
L. Ma and C. S. Lee, “Evaluating the effectiveness of blended learning using the ARCS model,” J. Comput. Assist. Learn., 2021, doi: 10.1111/jcal.12579.
K. A. Berga et al., “Blended learning versus face-to-face learning in an undergraduate nursing health assessment course: A quasi-experimental study,” Nurse Educ. Today, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104622.
S. Lohnes Watulak, “Reflection in action: using inquiry groups to explore critical digital literacy with pre-service teachers,” Educ. Action Res., 2016, doi: 10.1080/09650792.2015.1106957.
J. Habgood-Coote, “Group Inquiry,” Erkenntnis, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10670-020-00232-5.
A. Vetter, M. Schieble, and K. M. Martin, “Examining silences in an English teacher inquiry group focused on critical conversations: A facilitator’s reflexive analysis,” Linguist. Educ., 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.linged.2021.100951.
P. Reimann, “Connecting learning analytics with learning research: the role of design-based research,” Learn. Res. Pract., 2016, doi: 10.1080/23735082.2016.1210198.
T. M. Uoc, D. Van Dan, N. A. Tuan, D. T. Thanh, H. V. Dung, and T. T. Hoa, “Solutions to Promote the Development of Science and Technology to Develop Productive Force in Viet Nam Today,” Rev. Int. Geogr. Educ. Online, 2021, doi: 10.48047/rigeo.11.05.268.
D. Yulianti, Wiyanto, A. Rusilowati, and S. E. Nugroho, “Development of physics learning teaching materials based on science technology engineering and mathematics to develop 21st century learning skills,” Periodico Tche Quimica. 2020.
K. M. Quinlan and E. Pitt, “Towards signature assessment and feedback practices: a taxonomy of discipline-specific elements of assessment for learning,” Assess. Educ. Princ. Policy Pract., 2021, doi: 10.1080/0969594X.2021.1930447.
N. S. Baharudin, D. Harun, and M. Kadar, “An assessment of the movement and function of children with specific learning disabilities: A review of five standardised assessment tools,” Malaysian J. Med. Sci., 2020, doi: 10.21315/mjms2020.27.2.3.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Motlan, Satria Mihardi, Jurubahasa Sinuraya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors wishing to include figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
