Simulation on Collective Panic Behavior Based on PI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/tnc.66.5740Keywords:
Collective Panic Behavior, MAS(Multi-Agent-Simulation), PI(Propagation Intensity), PlatformAbstract
The collective panic behavior, which is caused by PI (Propagation Intensity), influences the welfare of citizens and the stability of the society (business). A well-known challenge is to understand the spreading mechanism of the panic behavior. In this work, the PI is classified as and , defined in the coefficient (Promotion Intensity) and (Inhibition Intensity) in the probability. MAS (multi-agent-simulation) model/tool is used to construct the systematic structure composed of four types of the participants (the individuals, the mass media, the social leaders, and the supervisors).This tool stimulates the collective panic behavior from the initial coefficient and , showing the different results in the condition of the population size and the conformity. Through setting up the rules and the strategies in an emergency, the framework stimulates the interaction between the agents (e.g. between the individuals, between the individuals and the mass media, between the individuals and the social leaders, between the individuals and the supervisors). The results advocate that the current simulator might be an appropriate first step towards the simulation and analysis of the combination of rules and strategies in panic behavior.References
(1) Barabási AL, Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 1999;286:509–12.
(2) Bergemann D, Valimaki J. Learning and strategic pricing. Econometrica 1996;64(5):1125–49.
(3) Bi Hongyin (2007).Analysis of the Group Influence in the Formation and Change of Network Public Opinion[J].Journal of TianJin University: (Social Sciences Edition),9(3):270-273.(in Chinese)
(4) Carlos Lemos, Rui Jorge Lopes, Helder Coelho (2016). On Legitimacy Feedback Mechanisms in Agent-Based Modeling of Civil Violence[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Vol.31,106-127.
(5) Chang Qin, Dang Huisen (2011).Research on population clustering model based on grid agent[J]. Journal of the People's Public Security University(Natural Science Edition), 17(3):71-74. (in Chinese)
(6) Chen Peng, Chen Jianguo (2015).Research on Multi - Agent Modeling of Sudden Group Violence[J].Computer Simulation, 32(1):377-381.(in Chinese)
(7) Chen Shiming, Huang Jiangping, Jiang Hong (2007). Research on modeling and simulation of swarm behavior in uncertain environment[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 43(21):32-35. (in Chinese)
(8) Dai Wei, Yu Lean, Tang Ling, Shen Yan (2015).A Study on the Public Information Strategy of Public Panic in Unconventional Emergencies: Based on Multi-Agent[J]. System Engineering-Theory &Practice,
(3):641-650.(in Chinese)
(9) Du Rong, Liang Hongxia (2011).Simulation Government’s Guide Effect on Network Opinion of Public Crisis[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 30(11):61-66. (in Chinese)
(10) Du Rong, Liang Lei,Wang Ning (2015). A Simulation Study on the Mass Emergency Evolution Based on the Social Physics——Evolution of Community Advice and Behavior[J].Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 12(3):61-69.(in Chinese)
(11) Edward Chow, Jonathan Elkind (2005). Hurricane Katrina and US Energy Security[J].Survival, 47(4):145-160.
(12) He Xiaoyuan, Hu Xiaofeng, Si Guangya (2010). Research on network information communication behavior based on social physics[J]. Journal of System Simulation, (12):2957-2962.(in Chinese)
(13) Izquierdo SS, Izquierdo LR, Galán JM, Hernández C(2005). Market failure caused by quality uncertainty. In: Mathieu P, Beaufils B, Brandouy O, editors. Artificial economics — lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems 564. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2005.
(14) Kirman AP, Vriend NJ (2001). Evolving market structure: an ACE model of price dispersion and loyalty. Journal of Economics Dynamic Control. 25(3–4):459–502.
(15) Kou Gang, Zhao Yiyi, Peng Yi (2012).Modeling and Analysis of Snapping Behavior under Sudden Incident[J]. Chinese Journal of Operations Research,20(1):85-91.(in Chinese)
(16) Li Huaqiang, Fan Chunmei, Jia Jianmin (2009). Public Risk Awareness and Emergency Management in Sudden Disasters: A Case Study of 5.12 Wenchuan Earthquake[J]. Management World, (6):52-63.(in Chinese)
(17) Li Lanying (2008).Based on CA's network of public opinion factors[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 8(22):6179-6183.(in Chinese)
(18) Li Naiwen, Liu Yi, Huang Min (2014).A Study on Influencing Factors of Intrinsic Deviation in Individual Risk in Unconventional Emergencies[J]. Journal of China Safety Science, 24(5):10-14.(in Chinese)
(19) Liu Jia, Xie Kefan (2013).Study on influential factors of individual decision-making behavior of unconventional emergencies[J]. Soft Science, 27(3):50-54.(in Chinese)
(20) Liu Junguang, Ou Wei (2014). Research on Emergence Model and Simulation of Rumor Propagation of Sudden Incident[J]. Military Operations Research and Systems Engineering, 28(3):66-69. (in Chinese)
(21) LuQiaoyu, Shao Bo (2011).Analyzing public emergencies in the main behavior model based on the system thinking[J]. Public Management,(10):149-152.(in Chinese)
(22) Qiang Chaohua, Wu Peng (2014).A Study on the Behavior of Internet Users in the Process of Public Opinion Evolution of Sudden Events[J].Journal of Information Analysis and Research,(6):71-78.(in Chinese)
(23) Sun Duoyong (2006). The Economic Analysis on the phenomenon of individual buying in emergencies[J]. Economy and Management, (11):208-231.(in Chinese)
(24) Thomas A.Glass, Monica Schoch-Spana (2002). Bioterrorism and the People: How to Vaccinate City against Panic[J].Clinical Infectious Disease,34(2):217-223.
(25) Virginia Giorno, Serena Spina (2016). Rumor Spreading Models With Random Denials[J]. Physica A, Vol.461,569-576.
(26) Wei Jiuchang, Zhou Lei, Zhou Xin (2011). A Study on the Evolving Mechanism of Group Snapping in Public Crisis - A Case Study of Salt Selling in China Based on Japan's Nuclear Crisis[J]. Journal of management Case Study, 12(6):478-486.(in Chinese)
(27) Xie Liren, Chen Junmei, Zhang Minqin (2013).Research on influencing factors of sudden snapping behavior[J].Journal of XiAn University of Technology, 33(7):572-576.(in Chinese)
(28) Xu Zhiyu (2003).Compensation structure leads to control transfer - an analysis of SARS induced buying behavior [J]. Journal of FuZhou University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), (4):9-11.(in Chinese)
(29) Yang Zhimo, Si Guangya, Li Zhiqiang (2010).Design and implementation of large - scale group behavior simulation model[J].Journal of System Simulation,22(3):724-727.(in Chinese)
(30) Yuan Guiqiu, Pu Guohua (2005). Theoretical Explanation in Panic Buying[J]. Statistics and Decision, (1):56-57. (in Chinese)
(31) Zhang Fang, Si Guangya, Luo Pi (2011).A rumored propagation
simulation model based on communication function[J].Journal of System Simulation, 23(11):2482-2486.(in Chinese)
(32) Zhang Yaofeng, Xiao Renbin (2014).Emergence mechanism of consensus synchronization in internet collective behavior based on cellular automata[J]. System Engineering - Theory & Practice,
(10):2600-2608. (in Chinese)
(33) Zhang Yaofeng, Xiao Renbin (2015).Model and simulation of consensus evolution mass emergency[J]. Application Research of computers,32(2):351-355. (in Chinese)
(34) Zhao Laijun, Cheng Jingjing (2010). Research on Individual Behavior State under Unconventional Sudden Incident Based on Mutation Theory[J]. Journal of China Safety Science, 20(12):14-19. (in Chinese)
(35) Zhao Yiyi, Peng Yi, Xiao Lei (2015). Study on the Mechanism of Public Opinion Propagation of Group Snapping in Sudden Incident[J].System Engineering-Theory & Practice, 35(3):616-622. (in Chinese)
(36) Zheng Xiaojing, Zheng Junjun (2016).Criticality of symmetry breaking of collective behavior driven by Individual rules[J].System Engineering-Theory & Practice, 36(2):413-426. (in Chinese)
(37) Zhuang Yaming, Yu Hailin (2013). Research on Characteristics of Information Propagation Network of the Mass Unexpected Incident: A Case Analysis of Panic Buying of Candles[J]. Journal of Intelligence,32(7):37-42.(in Chinese)
