Detection of Damage in Rail Head by using Safe Method

Authors

  • Sara. Teidj Systems of Communications and Detection Laboratory Faculty of Sciences Tetuan, Morocco
  • Abdellah Driouach Systems of Communications and Detection Laboratory Faculty of Sciences Tetuan, Morocco
  • Abdellatif Khamlichi Systems of Communications and Detection Laboratory ENSA Tetuan, Morocco

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/tmlai.54.3325

Keywords:

rail, waveguide, pulsed laser, air-coupled, safe method, laser vibrometry.

Abstract

The first cause of train derailment incidents is due to the transverse defect which occurs in the railhead. It is typically an open or internal crack developing in a plane which is generally perpendicular to the direction of the rail. The most method used today of rail inspection is based on ultrasound .The Ultrasounds based testing is performed according to the excitation-echo procedure. It is conducted conventionally by using a contact excitation probe that rolls on the rail head or by a contact-less system using laser as excitation and air coupled acoustic sensors for wave reception [1].

In this work, Propagation of guided elastic waves in a rail has been modelled by using the semi-analytical finite element method [2]. We have demonstrated the existence of several frequency windows that can be used to excite propagating modes with high deformation in the railhead.


References

(1) B.D. Jeffery, M.L. Peterson, “Assessment of Rail Flaw Inspection Data,” A Center of Excellence for Rural and Intermodal Transportation, 1999.

(2) I. Bartoli, “Structural health monitoring by ultrasonic guided waves,” PhD Thesis, University of California, San Diego, 2007.

(3) U. Zerbst, R. Lundén, K.O. Edel and R.A, Smith,

“Introduction to the damage tolerance behaviour of railway rails,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics,vol. 76, pp. 2563-2601, 2009.

(4) D.F. Cannon, K.O. Edel, S.L. Grassie, K. Sawley, “Rail defects: an overview,” Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, pp. 865-887, 2003.

(5) K. Sawley, R. Reiff, “Rail Failure Assessment for the Office

of the Rail Regulator,” Report No P-00-070 produced by Transportation Technology Center Inc, Pueblo, Colorado, USA,

(6) C. Duverger, B. Prazil , “Un nouvel engin d’auscultation des rails à la SNCF,” Revue Générale des Chemins de Fer. Paris: Bordas-Dunod,pp. 1-12, 1984.

(7) Y. Fan, S. Dixon, R.S.Edwards, X. Jian, “Ultrasonic surface wave propagation and interaction with surface defects on rail track head,” NDT & E International,pp. 71-7,2007.

(8) T. Hayashi, W. J. Song, J. L Rose, “Guided wave dispersion curves for a bar with an arbitrary cross-section, a rod and rail example,” Ultrasonics,pp. 175-183,2003.

(9) COMSOL User's Guide and Documentation version 4.3a. COMSOL AB.

(10) M.V. Predoi, M. Castaings, B. Hosten, C. Bacon , “Wave propagation along transversely periodic structures,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,pp. 1935-1944,2007.

(11) F.L. di Scalea., J. McNamara, “Ultrasonic NDE of railroad tracks: air-coupled cross-sectional inspection and long-range inspection,” Insight - NDT& Condition Monitoring, vol. 45,pp. 394-401, 2003.

Downloads

Published

2017-09-01

How to Cite

Teidj, S., Driouach, A., & Khamlichi, A. (2017). Detection of Damage in Rail Head by using Safe Method. Transactions on Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.14738/tmlai.54.3325

Issue

Section

Special Issue : 1st International Conference on Affective computing, Machine Learning and Intelligent Systems