Some Observations on the Good and Bad Chances of Feasible Social Engineering
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.711.9358Keywords:
social manufacturing, social engineering, social results, creative capabilities, destructive capabilities, history, aesthetics, law, communication.Abstract
We attempt to discuss anew the idea of engaging in total social transformation without regard to huge human cost. We argue that “social engineering” entails much more risk than useful achievement, for our destructive capabilities exceed our creativity potential. To support the argument we draw some parallels between key social and political phenomena with aesthetic, communicative, or legal ones. Especially dangerous seems to be a partial appropriation of time, space and history, or a full disregard of them in efforts to change society. In the end we come to the conclusion that, while social manufacturing is feasible, at least to a certain extent, the end result of the process is quite often no better than the previous state of affairs. Therefore, the question of human capacity to effect social transformation should be accompanied by the question “with which specific result”.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors wishing to include figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.