Civil Law: A Review Literature of Indonesian University Student Perspectives

Main Article Content

Muhammad Arifin

Abstract

Indonesia has one of the world’s most legally diverse and complex civil law systems in the world. The country’s civil code was inherited from the Dutch during the colonization era. The aim of this study was to examine the perceptions of Indonesian students about their country's civil law. It was established that no particular study had explored the issue under investigation. As a result, the researcher developed a novel conceptual framework to facilitate the collection and analysis of relevant data from books and journal articles. Specifically, a combination of the Grounded Theory (GT) research approach and thematic analysis was used as the methodology for gathering and evaluating data. The findings revealed that Indonesian students think that their country’s civil code does not effectively meet the various needs of the local communities. Moreover, the research also confirmed Indonesian students lack interest and expertise to research about the nation’s civil law. It is recommended that to improve the reliability and validity of the present study, future researchers should collect primary data by interviewing and administering questionnaires to students.

Article Details

How to Cite
Arifin, M. (2020). Civil Law: A Review Literature of Indonesian University Student Perspectives. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 7(4), 483-490. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.74.8129
Section
Articles

References

Agusman, I. D. D. (2015). Treaties Under Indonesian Law: A Comparative Study. Rosda.
Bedner, A. (2001). Administrative courts in Indonesia: a socio-legal study (Vol. 6). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Bell, G. F. (2014). Codification and Decodification: The state of the civil and commercial codes in Indonesia. In Codification in East Asia (pp. 39-50). Springer, Cham.
Birks, D. F., Fernandez, W., Levina, N., & Nasirin, S. (2013). Grounded theory method in information systems research: its nature, diversity and opportunities. European Journal of Information Systems, 22(1), 1-8.
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage.
Boychuk Duchscher, J. E., & Morgan, D. (2004). Grounded theory: reflections on the emergence vs. forcing debate. Journal of advanced nursing, 48(6), 605-612.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2014). What can “thematic analysis” offer health and wellbeing researchers?. International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 9.
Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Weate, P. (2016). Using thematic analysis in sport and exercise research. In Routledge handbook of qualitative research in sport and exercise (pp. 213-227). Routledge.
Bruce, J. W., Giovarelli, R., Rolfes Jr, L., Bledsoe, D., & Mitchell, R. (2006). Land law reform: Achieving development policy objectives. The World Bank.
Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2010). Grounded theory in historical perspective: An epistemological account. Handbook of grounded theory, 31-57.
Burns, P. (2004). The Leiden legacy: Concepts of law in Indonesia (p. 1). Leiden: KITLV Press.
Center, G. I. (2015). Indonesia Criminal Justice System Laws, Regulations and Procedures Handbook. Global Investment Center, USA.
Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2013). Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning. The psychologist, 26(2).
Correia, Z. D. C. C. P. (1997). Scanning the business environment for information: a grounded theory approach (Doctoral dissertation, University of Sheffield).
Douglas, D. (2003). Inductive theory generation: A grounded approach to business inquiry. Electronic journal of business research methods, 2(1), 47-54.
Feeler, G.W. (2012). Being there: A grounded-theory study of student perceptions of instructor presence in online classes. Educational Administration: Theses, Dissertations, and Student Research, 1-205.
Fernández, W. D., Lehmann, H., & Underwood, A. (2002). Rigor and relevance in studies of IS innovation: A grounded theory methodology approach. ECIS 2002 Proceedings, 134.
Foley, G., & Timonen, V. (2015). Using grounded theory method to capture and analyze health care experiences. Health Services Research, 50(4), pp. 1195-1210.
Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Introduction to applied thematic analysis. Applied thematic analysis, 3, pp. 20-31.
Halaweh, M. (2012). Integration of grounded theory and case study: An exemplary application from e-commerce security perception research. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 13(1), pp. 31-51.
Irawan Soerodjo, S. H. (2016). The development of indonesian civil law. Scientific Research Journal(SCIRJ), 4(10), pp. 30-35.
Juwana, H. (2006). Legal education reform in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 1(1), pp. 1932-0205.
Kaneko, Y. (Ed.). (2019). Civil law reforms in post-colonial Asia: Beyond western capitalism. Springer.
Kenny, M., & Fourie, R. (2015). Contrasting classic, Straussian, and constructivist grounded theory: methodological and philosophical conflicts. The Qualitative Report, 20(8), 1270-1289.
Larsson, I. E., Sahlsten, M. J., Sjöström, B., Lindencrona, C. S., & Plos, K. A. (2007). Patient participation in nursing care from a patient perspective: a Grounded Theory study. Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 21(3), 313-320.
Lev, D. S. (2000). Legal evolution and political authority in Indonesia: selected essays. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Lind, M., & Goldkuhl, G. (2006). How to develop a multi-grounded theory: The evolution of a business process theory. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 13(2), 22-38.
Logli, C. (2016). Higher education in Indonesia: Contemporary challenges in governance, access, and quality. In The Palgrave handbook of Asia Pacific higher education (pp. 561-581). Palgrave Macmillan.
Noble, H., & Mitchell, G. (2016). What is grounded theory? Evidence-Based Nursing, 19(2), pp. 34-35.
Orlikowski, W. J. (1993). CASE tools as organizational change: Investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development. MIS Quarterly, pp. 309-340.
Poteat, T., German, D., & Kerrigan, D. (2013). Managing uncertainty: a grounded theory of stigma in transgender health care encounters. Social science & medicine, 84, 22-29.
Rodgers, W.H. (1899). Addresses and papers. University of Michigan.
Santos, J. D., Erdmann, A. L., Sousa, F. G. M., Lanzoni, G. M. M., Melo, A. L. S. F., & Leite, J. L. (2016). Methodological perspectives in the use of grounded theory in nursing and health research. Esc Anna Nery, 20(3), 56-69.
Sinaga, V. S. (2018). Private law schools in Indonesia: Their development, governance and role in society. International Journal of Asia-Pacific Studies, 14(2), 16-27.
Thornberg, R. (2012). Informed grounded theory. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(3), 243-259.
Urquhart, C. (2001). An encounter with grounded theory: Tackling the practical and philosophical issues. In Qualitative research in IS: Issues and trends (pp. 104-140). IGI Global.
Vrij, A., Nunkoosing, K., Knight, S., & Cherryman, J. (2003). Using grounded theory to examine people's attitudes toward how animals are used. Society & Animals, 11(4), pp. 307-327.
Webster, M. D. (2016, March). Examining philosophy of technology using grounded theory methods. In Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 17(2), http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs160252.
Whiteley, A. M. (2004). Grounded research: A modified grounded theory for the business setting. Qualitative research journal, 4(2), 27-38.