Development and Innovation of Curriculum in Foreign Language

Authors

  • Eva Lelakova University of Zilina in Zilina (SLOVAKIA)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.21.644

Keywords:

knowledge society, education, accreditation, inner system of quality of education, study programme

Abstract

The primary aim of the Faculty of Humanities of the University of Žilina in Žilina is providing education of a very high quality. Its realization is evaluated not only by the Accreditation commission but also by the Slovak government advisory body which monitors, reviews and independently evaluates the quality of educational, research, development, artistic and other activities of Slovak universities.
The evaluation of Academic ranking and rating agency (ARRA) is based on publicly available and verifiable data concerning the quality of education and research of individual faculties in Slovakia. It is often a decisive criterion in the selection of the university where the students will be studying. The Faculty of Humanities was ranked first in the group of philosophical faculties in the 2012 ARRA evaluation in Slovakia and its aim has become a continuous, high-quality training of students in order to improve their labour market success. To reach the mentioned aim the faculty participates in various projects concentrating on the development and innovation of curriculum with emphasis on the needs of the labour market and knowledge society. As intercultural communication is nowadays one of the key priorities and important pre-conditions for the processes of globalization, our project team has decided to prepare accreditation documents for the study programme Intercultural communication focusing on comparison of socio-cultural dimensions of English speaking countries with the national peculiarities of Slovakia.  

 

References

Neubauer, Z. (1993). Obnova ideje univerzity. Univerzita Karlova, vydavatelství Karolinum, Praha, 160 p.

Čikešová, M. Bolonský proces – Čo? Kde? Prečo? [online]. 2010. [quot. 2014-01-26]. Available on: http://cikesova.blog.sme.sk/c/233489/Bolonsky-proces-Co-Kde-Preco.html

Cabanová, V. (2002). Didaktické spôsobilosti učiteľa v praktickej príprave kreditového systému. In: Zborník z vedeckej konferencie Spolupráca univerzity a škôl. Banská Bystrica: PF UMB, pp.62-66

Stašková, J. (2011). Výsledky vzdelávania ako súčasť kvality vzdelávania, Európske štandardy kvality vo vysokoškolskom vzdelávaní. Bratislava, 38 p.

Gehmlich, V. (2006). The Added Value of Using ECTS. In: EUA, Bologna Handbook. Making Bologna Work. Berlin: European University Association

Hrnčiar, M., Rostášová, M. (2012). Hlavný proces vzdelávanie, DEQUA 1.1, pp.1-10

Politiky SNAS. [online]. 2014. [quot. 2014-01-26]. Available on: http://www.snas.sk/index.php?l=sk&p=5

Vysoké školy by pri akreditácii mali mať menej administratívnej práce [online].2013. [quot. 2014-01-26]. Available on: http://www.istp.sk/clanok/3500/Vysoke-skoly-

by-pri-akreditacii-mali-mat-menej-administrativnej-prace

Sústava študijných odborov [online]. 2014. [quot. 2014-01-26]. Available on: http://www.akredkom.sk/index.pl?tmpl=odbory

Pokorný, M. (2004). Príklad aplikácie kreditového systému na Žilinskej univerzite v Žiline. In: Zborník prednášok zo seminára Kreditový systém a dodatok k diplomu a predstavenie programu ERASMUS MUNDUS. Žilina, pp. 26-30

Cabanová, V. ( 2012). Pôsobenie kultúr v školskom prostredí. Žilina: Žilinská univerzita,148 p.

Kráľová, Z. (2013). Akreditačný spis študijného programu interkultúrna komunikácia. 41 p.

Vidova, J. (2004). Vzdelávanie – jeho potreba a nevyhnutnosť. In: Zborník príspevkov z konferencie Výchova k ľudským právam v boji proti diskriminácii. Bratislava,112 p.

Matulčík, J. (2007). K niektorým otázkam hodnotenia vzdelávania dospelých. In: Aeduca 2006. Olomouc : Univerzita Palackého, pp.1-8

Downloads

Published

2015-01-28

How to Cite

Lelakova, E. (2015). Development and Innovation of Curriculum in Foreign Language. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.21.644