Main Article Content

Konstantinos Vasileios Zacharis


Modern management systems incorporate evaluation and self-assessment mechanisms to improve the quality of services and to enhance their added value in terms of the taxes spent on their operation. The same applies to the public sector educational systems at all levels (primary, secondary, tertiary). Within this context, the objectives of the professional teachers, which are complex and complex, are analyzed. They include not only the knowledge transfer but also instilling values and attitudes to pupils. This is why most teachers believe it is not a morally good idea to try to evaluate these "sensitive" systems. Thus, any legislative actions on evaluation causes intense controversy and concern in the public dialogue since it is de facto considered non-democratic and contrary to the cultural ethics of the profession of teachers. Under these circumstances, the Ministry of Education decided to apply the evaluation in two parallel steps, internal and external. In this paper we look at the effectiveness and efficiency of this strategy, along with the policies that are in place for that purpose.

Article Details

How to Cite
Zacharis, K. V. (2019). THEORETICAL APPROACH OF EVALUATION & ASSESSMENT WITHIN EDUCATIONAL CONTEXT. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 6(1), 67–74.


Barth, R. (1990). Improving Schools from Within: Teachers, Parents and Principals Can Make the Difference. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass

Bartol, K. M., & Martin, D. C. (1991). Management, New York: McGraw Hill.

Broadfoot, P. (1996). Education, Assessment and Society: A Sociological Analysis. Buckingham: Open University Press

Danielson, C. (2011). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. ASCD.

Eurydice (2004). Evaluation of Schools providing Compulsory Education in Europe, Brussels

Government Gazette (2013). Evaluation of teachers in primary and secondary level education. PD 152/5-11-2013, Athens

Kellaghan, T. & Stufflebeam, D. (2003). International Handbook of Educational Evaluation. Boston: Kluwer Academic

Lamnias, C. (2002). “The contemporary Pedagogic Device: Functional Impositions and Limitations”, στο Pedagogy, Culture & Society, V. 10 (1), pp. 21-38

Norris, N. (1990). Understanding Educational Evaluation, London, Kegan Paul

Office for Standards in Education (Ofsted) (2003). Inspecting Schools - Framework for Inspecting Schools, Effective from September 2003, HMI 1525

Reavill, L. R. (1998). Quality assessment, total quality management and the stakeholders in the UK higher education system. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 8(1), 55-63.

Simons H. (1987). Getting to Know Schools in a Democracy: The Politics and Process of Evaluation, Lewes, The Falmer Press

Solomon, J. (1998). Trends in the Evaluation of Education Systems. School (self) Evaluation and Decentralization, Papers, Reports, Discussion Outcomes, European Workshop, Pedagogical Institute, 9-11 Dec 1997, Athens

Solomon J. (1999). Internal Evaluation & Scheduling of Educational Work inside the School Unit. Pedagogical Institute, Evaluation Dept., Athens