Recurrent Misunderstandings Eroding the Field of Communication Studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1212.19768Keywords:
Science, person, message, verbal communication, written communication, Shannon model, theory, empirical work, Ancient EgyptAbstract
More than recognized, misunderstandings are a constant concomitant of human activities in industry and academia. This truism traces back to ancient writers, and communication studies is no exception. (Re)assessment of misunderstandings has the potential to refurbish skills and awareness needed to accomplish better, keener research. However, as literatures and fragmentations of communication studies build up, discussions on and/or critical accounts of ensuing misunderstandings tend to lag behind. One reason behind this shortage is a popular aversion for theory or verbiage. Another reason resides in the hype for new media and uptake thereof. Still another reason centers around the attractive dominance of big data or large-scale quantitative research. The present paper unbundled deep-seated and taken-for-granted misunderstandings crippling communication research. To this effect, the paper proposed paths forward with a refocus/rethink of central concepts, models, and definitions underpinning communication research.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sylvain Cibangu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors wishing to include figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
