Reconsideration of Research Methodologies: A Look at Major Trails and Concepts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1112.17989Keywords:
Positivism, interpretivism, situational responsivity, objectivity, hermeneutic circle, quantum physics, constructivism, Cartesianism, naturalism, scienceAbstract
Reconsideration of research methodologies becomes a necessity as academic disciplines and their publications have been proliferating relentlessly in recent decades. While research methodologies determine the pay-off as well as validity of academic research across scientific disciplines, research practice tends not to verge on assessing research methodologies. One reason might be that the concept research methodologies and the like usually come in the form of how-to-do section or book, leaving discussions to other sections/books of research. Another reason lies in the fact that research methodologies are seen as mere verbiage or theory. Yet, research methodologies furnish the tools with which to practice research. The present paper tracked major trails, concepts, and recurrent misunderstandings of both positivism and interpretivism. The paper did so to allow for sharper methodological toolkits and keener research.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sylvain Cibangu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors wishing to include figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.