Evaluation analysis during discursive interactions in nursing courses through SDIS-GSEQ.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.34.1926Keywords:
mentors, patient simulation, discourse analysis, learning processes, teacher-student interactionAbstract
Background: Discourse in the field of education is structured in IRE/F patterns, which give the teacher the ability to lead interaction in the classroom. The objective of the study was to identify discourse patterns present in practical nursing courses, with a focus on the evaluation of the teacher and assistants.
Method: The participants of the study were videotaped and the data obtained was recorded and categorized using the SDIS-GSEQ software in order to obtain discursive sequences.
Results: The teacher and assistants used divergent IRE/F structures: the teacher gave an explanation after conducting an evaluation of the student in order to impart knowledge, and the assistants evaluated repeatedly and sought for evidence of knowledge in the students by asking them to give examples.
Conclusion: The occupied roles will be defined as “guide/ primary expert” and “instigator/supervisor”, and these roles will persist even if the knowledge of the practice is or is not negotiated. It is recommended to take the discourse to conditions of greater negotiation of knowledge in order to improve teaching.
[Keywords: mentors, patient simulation, discourse analysis, learning processes, teacher-student interaction]
References
American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved from http://apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx
Anguera, M. T. & Izquierdo, C. (2006). Methodological approaches in human communication. From complexity of situation to data analysis. In G. Riva, M.T. Anguera, H. Wiederhold & F. Mantovani (Eds.), From Communication to Presence: Cognition, Emotions and Culture towards the Ultimate Communicative. Amsterdam: IOS Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/pres.16.5.559
Bakeman, R. (1978). Untangling streams of behavior: Sequential analysis of observation data. In G.P. Sackett (Ed.) Observing Behavior (Vol. 2): Data collection and analysis methods (pp. 63-78). Baltimore: University of Park Press.
Bakeman, R. (1991). Prólogo. In M. T. Anguera (Ed.). Metodología observacional en la investigación psicológica. Vol. I. (pp. 13-24). Barcelona: P.P.U.
Bakeman, R., Adamson, L.B., y Strisik, P. (1988). Lags and logs: Statistic approaches to interaction. In M.H. Bornstein y J. Bruner (Eds.), Interaction in human development. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Bakeman, R. & Dabbs, J. M. (1976). Social interaction observed: Some approaches to the analysis of behavior streams. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2: 335-345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014616727600200403
Bakeman, R. & Gottman, J.M. (1986).Observación de la interacción: Introducción al análisis secuencial. Madrid: Morata.
Bakeman, R. & Quera, V. (1996).Análisis de la interacción: Análisis secuencial con SDIS y GSEQ. Madrid: Ra-Ma.
Bakeman, R., & Quera, V. (2001). Using GSEQ with SPSS. Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento, 3(2): 195–214.
Bakeman, R., & Quera, V. (2011). Sequential analysis and observational methods for the behavioral sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139017343
Cazden, C. (2001). Classroom discourse. The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Drew, P. and J. Heritage 1992. Analyzing talk at work: an introduction. In P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings (pp. 3-65) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fairclough, N. 1989. Language and power. London: Longman.
Hughes, M. and Westgate, D. (1998) Possible Enabling Strategies in Teacher-led Talk with Young Pupils. Language and Education 12(3): 174-91
Kaplan, C. (2004). La inteligencia escolarizada. Buenos Aires: Miño y Dávila.
Manke, M. (1997). Classroom power relations: understanding student-teacher interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Markee, N. 2000. Conversation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Nassaji, H. and Wells, G. (2000). What’s the use of “triadic dialogue”?: An investigation of teacher-student interaction. Applied Linguistics 21(3): 376-406.
Ozemir, O. (2009). Three turn sequences in reading classroom discourse. The British Association of Applied Linguistics. Website: http://baal.org.uk/proc09/ozemir.pdf
Pajares, F. (1992). Teacher’s beliefs and education research: cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research 62(3): 307-332.
Quera, V. (1993).Análisis secuencial. In M.T. Anguera (Ed.) Metodología observacional en la investigación psicológica. Vol. II. Barcelona: P.P.U.
Sackett, G.P. (1979). The lag sequential analysis of contingency and cyclicity on behavioral interaction research. In J.D. Osofsky (Ed.).Handbook of infant development (pp. 623-649). New York: Wiley.
Sackett, G. P. (1980). An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing Sociology. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in Social Interactions. New York: Free Press.
Sackett, G. P. (1987). Analysis of sequential social interaction data: Some issues, recent developments, and causal inference model. In: J. Osofsky (eds.), Handbook of infant development. (pp. 855-878). New York: Wiley.
Saikko, V. (2007) Different student strategies for power in the IRF pattern in an EFL classroom. Pro-Gradu Rhesis. Website: https://jyx.jyu.fi/dspace/bitstream/handle/123456789/7429/URN_NBN_fi_jyu-2007629.pdf?sequence=1
Sinclair, J. & Coulthard, R. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stiggins, R. (2006). What a difference a word makes. Assessment for learning rather than assessment of learning helps students succeed. Journal of Staff Development, 27(1): 10-14.
Thornborrow, J. 2002. Power talk. Language and interaction in institutional discourse. Harlow: Longman.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors wishing to include figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
