Assessing Accented Speech with a Data-Based Assessment Framework: The Key to Evidence-based Accent-Management

Authors

  • Amee P Shah School of Health Sciences, Stockton University, Galloway, NJ

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.115.16953

Abstract

Background: Foreign-accent Management continues to be a rapidly growing area. However, due to the vast variability and lack of professional regulation in this area of practice, Speech-language Pathologists and English-as-Second-Language teachers grapple with the basics of assessment, setting goals, planning therapy, and identifying successful outcomes for accent Management. Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to introduce practitioners/teachers to a framework of assessment of accent-related communication concerns. The CAAI assessment framework provides major areas to include in assessment of accented speech, along with methods to assess with key examples. Using a proven assessment framework helps identify the key speech and language issues that interfere with communication, thereby setting an useful baseline for effective intervention, numerically tracking progress along the way, and conducting a systematic post-intervention outcome assessment. Methodology: Twenty-two areas of communication are identified and described in detail as key areas to identify accent-related concerns. Pre- and post-therapy assessment data, intelligibility judgments by independent raters, and the clients’ judgments are used to quantitatively diagnose, set goals in therapy, and measure eventual therapy outcomes. Conclusions: Use of a data-driven, objective assessment method helps clinicians to be evidence-based, systematic, and consistent in helping individuals with accented speech. As a result, clients’ goals of clear communication can be met rapidly and efficiently.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-16

How to Cite

Shah, A. P. (2024). Assessing Accented Speech with a Data-Based Assessment Framework: The Key to Evidence-based Accent-Management . Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 11(5), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.115.16953