How a Simple Tort Claim is Transformed into an Exposition of the Implications of Artificial Intelligence on the American Legal System

Authors

  • Richard J. Hunter Stillman School of Business, Seton Hall University, Collins College of Business, University of Tulsa
  • John H. Shannon Stillman School of Business, Seton Hall University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.107.15075

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence (AI), Montreal Convention, sanctions, Chat GPT, 12(b)(6) motion, fabricated research, prompts

Abstract

This article discusses issues relating to artificial intelligence (AI) in the context of a lawsuit essentially alleging negligence. The case, however, quickly turned to a discussion relating to how the plaintiff’s attorneys, with the aid of ChatGPT, fabricated as series of precedents that would have permitted their case to go forward on the basis of the application of a statute of limitations found in the Montreal Convention. The article discusses AI as it applies to the Rules of Professional Conduct and Rule 11 of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure relating to the duties and responsibilities of attorneys. All of the quotations and factual representations are taken from the Case Documentations.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-19

How to Cite

Hunter, R. J., & Shannon, J. H. (2023). How a Simple Tort Claim is Transformed into an Exposition of the Implications of Artificial Intelligence on the American Legal System. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 10(7), 142–170. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.107.15075

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 7 (2023): Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Richard J. Hunter, John H. Shannon

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors wishing to include figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.

Most read articles by the same author(s)