Legal Service Unit and Teacher Protection as A Mediation Forum for Penal Violence in the World of Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.811.11311Keywords:
teacher criminalization, teacher protections, UPHPG, mediation penalAbstract
This study offers a development of a model of fair teacher protection, with a focus on research conducted in West Kalimantan, particularly in Pontianak City and Ketapang District. The offer of a just teacher protection model is based on the empirical facts that there is still violence in the world of education and/or the criminalization of teachers that is still happening. Although various laws and regulations have been regulated to provide legal protection for teachers, the mechanism for implementing legal protection for teachers has not yet been formulated, so the reality is that when problems occur in the world of education and/or criminalization of teachers, they are resolved in various ways, either through government agencies, teacher organizations, schools or police officers, and there are even mutual opinions on social media. Through the socio-juridical research method through interviews and discussions, it was found that the effort to provide legal protection for teachers is important to be regulated through regional policies related to the formation of the Legal Service Unit and Teacher Protection or Unit Pelayanan Hukum dan Perlindungan Guru (UPHPG) which can become a coordinating institution and a forum for solving legal problems for teachers. The focus of this article describes how the UPHPG is intended to be a mediation platform for penal mediation in resolving violence in education and/or criminalizing teachers.
References
R. H. Abdul Rahman Prakoso, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Profesi Guru Atas Tindakan Pemberian Hukuman Terhadap Siswa,” pp. 177–187.
Ta. Saihu, “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Guru,” Al Amin J. Kaji. Ilmu dan Budaya Islam, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 49–58, 2019.
H. Newnham, “When is a teacher or school liable in negligence?,” Aust. J. Teach. Educ., 2000, doi: 10.14221/ajte.2000v25n1.5.
A. M. Thompson, K. C. Herman, M. A. Stormont, W. M. Reinke, and C. Webster-Stratton, “Impact of Incredible Years® on teacher perceptions of parental involvement: A latent transition analysis,” J. Sch. Psychol., vol. 62, no. April, pp. 51–65, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2017.03.003.
L. Cohen-Vogel, L. Feng, and L. Osborne-Lampkin, “Seniority Provisions in Collective Bargaining Agreements and the ‘Teacher Quality Gap,’” Educ. Eval. Policy Anal., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 324–343, 2013, doi: 10.3102/0162373713482765.
I. Fauzi, “Dinamika Kekerasan Antara Guru dan Siswa Studi Fenomenologi Tentang Resistensi Antara Perlindungan Guru dan Perlindungan ANak,” J. Chem. Inf. Model., vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 1689–1699, 2019, doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
Y. AS, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Guru Yang Berkeadilan Di Kota Pontianak,” J. Huk. Media Bhakti, vol. 3, no. Desember 2019, pp. 153–164, 2019, doi: 10.32501/jhmb.v3i2.105.
Y. Serah and R. Setiawati, “Urgency Formation of Legal Service Institutions and Teacher Protection,” in Proceedings of the Proceedings of the First Brawijaya International Conference on Social and Political Sciences, BSPACE, 26-28 November, 2019, Malang, East Java, Indonesia, 2020, pp. 1–8, doi: 10.4108/eai.26-11-2019.2295209.
F. M. Tanjung and R. Darwin, “Implementation of Private Teacher Protection Policies,” vol. 384, no. Aisteel, pp. 416–420, 2020, doi: 10.2991/aisteel-19.2019.91.
Ah. Munawir, “Paradigma Guru dan Orangtua Terhadap Penerapan Undang-Undang Perlindungan ANak di Sekolah,” J. Islam. Econ. Law, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 110–123, 2019.
A. Imron, S. Supangat, and N. Rosyidah, “Penguatan Kesadaran Hukum Perlindungan Anak Bagi Guru Madrasah Diniyah Takmiliyah Dan Pondok Pesantren Anak-Anak Se Kabupaten Blora Jawa Tengah,” Dimas J. Pemikir. Agama untuk Pemberdaya., vol. 15, no. 2, p. 1, 2016, doi: 10.21580/dms.2015.152.743.
F. Fuad and S. Achmad, “Dialektika Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Guru Dalam Mendisiplinkan Siswa di Sekolah,” J. Law Policy Stud., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 56–65, 2020.
W. J. Hall and H. C. Dawes, “Is fidelity of implementation of an anti-bullying policy related to student bullying and teacher protection of students?,” Educ. Sci., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1–17, 2019, doi: 10.3390/educsci9020112.
W. Koski, “Teacher collective bargaining, teacher quality, and the teacher quality gap: Toward a policy analytic framework,” Harv. L. Pol’y Rev., vol. 6, no. 2000, p. 67, 2012.
D. B. Buller et al., “Accuracy of principal and teacher knowledge of school district policies on sun protection in California elementary schools,” Prev. Chronic Dis., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2018, doi: 10.5888/pcd15.170342.
R. Yenny AS, Setiawati, “Fulfillment Of Teacher Protection Rights,” pp. 1–10, 2019.
Y. A. Serah and R. Setiawati, “Non-Penal Policy Against Teacher Criminalization,” J. Crit. Revieuw, vol. 7, no. 14, pp. 656–660, 2020, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.14.115.
D. Priyatno, “Kriminalisasi Kebijakan,” J. Wawasan Yuridika, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 146–154, 2010.
S. Lasmadi, “Mediasi Penal Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia,” Inovatif, vol. Volume 4, no. No 5, pp. 1–10, 2011.
L. Mulyadi, “Mediasi Penal Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia: Pengkajian Asas, Norma, Teori Dan Praktik,” Yust. J. Huk., vol. 2, no. 1, 2013, doi: 10.20961/yustisia.v2i1.11054.
U. Usman and A. Najemi, “Mediasi Penal di Indonesia,” Undang J. Huk., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 65–83, 2018, doi: 10.22437/ujh.1.1.65-83.
N. Surbakti, “Mediasi Penal Sebagai Terobosan Alternatif Perlindungan Hak Korban Tindak Pidana,” J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 14 Nomor 1, no. 1, pp. 90–106, 2011.
M. Sari, “Jurnal Ilmu Hukum MEDIASI PENAL SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF MODEL,” no. 11, 2008.
L. Wulandari, “Kebijakan Penanganan Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga Melalui Mediasi Penal,” Law Reform, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 1, 2010, doi: 10.14710/lr.v4i1.312.
R. A. Fitriono, B. Setyanto, and R. Ginting, “Penegakan Hukum Malpraktik Melalui Pendekatan Mediasi Penal,” Yust. J. Huk., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 101–102, 2016, doi: 10.20961/yustisia.v5i1.8724
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Yenny Aman Serah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors wishing to include figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
