The three types of interference errors in numerical expression by Vietnamese EFL speakers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.810.11121Keywords:
Interference errors, numerical expression, general number, grammatically relevant, perceptualization, countabilityAbstract
This paper aims to investigate numerical expression by Vietnamese speakers of English as a foreign language (EFL). The study identifies and explains the causes of interference errors in expressing number of nouns. A descriptive-cognitive research design was conducted error-oriented investigation of 62 high-school students and 30 employees working in English-speaking companies participating in writing a 45-minute essay for numerical errors from the essays collected. The findings revealed that Vietnamese EFL speakers had difficulty in expressing the number of the entities represented by the nouns due to differences in means and manner of numerical expression in English whose sentences are numerically compulsory and grammatically relevant as opposed to those in Vietnamese whose numerical category is grammatically unimportant, but lexically relevant, and seen with number-neutral nouns or general numbers. Errors also occurred as Vietnamese EFL speakers failed to acquire the count-uncount distinction due in part to differences in perceptualizing the numerical meaning of the entities represented by nouns, ascribing the countability wrong and keeping the same property of countable/uncountable nouns despite having referred to different referents. The paper ended with some pedagogical implications to help Vietnamese EFL speakers improve numerical errors when using English.
References
. Allan, K. (1980). Nouns and Countability. Lang 56 (3), 541-557.
. Brown, H. D. (2006). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.) New York: Pearson Education.
. Bui, M. H. (2008). Ngôn ngữ học đối chiếu [ Contrastive linguistics]. NXB Giáo dục Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh [HCMC: Publisher of Education].
. Bui, T.T., Nguyen, V.B., Hoang, X. T., & Nguyen, T. Q (1995). Giáo trình tiếng Việt (Sách dùng cho giáo sinh ngữ văn và giáo viên ngữ văn phổ thông).NXB Giáo dục [Vietnamese coursebook (for teachers of literature, and high school teachers of literature). HCMC: Education of Publishing House
. Cao, X. H. (1999). Nghĩa của loại từ [Meaning of classifiers]. Ngôn ngữ. No. 2, 1-16
. Cao, X. H. (2001). Tiếng Viết: Mấy vấn đề ngữ âm ngữ pháp ngữ nghĩa [Vietnamese: Some issues in Vietnamese phonetics, syntax and semantics]. HCMC: NXB Giáo dục [Education Publishing House].
. Charters, H., Dao, L., & Jansen, L. (2012). Think of a number: Conceptual transfer in the second language acquisition of English plural-marking. CogniTextes [Online], 8. https://doi.org/10.4000/cognitextes.611
. Corbett, G. (2000). Number. Cambridge University Press.
. Corbett, G. G. (2006) Number. In K., Brown (Ed.). Encyclopedia of language and linguistics. New York: Elsevier, 7319-7325.
. Corder, S. P. (1981). Error analysis and interlanguage. Oxford University Press.
. Cunningworth, A. (1987). Evaluation and selecting EFL teaching materials. London:Heinemann Education Book.
. Dang, N. (2020). The transfer errors in nominal quantification by Vietnamese speakers of English as a foreign language in light of the language transfer theory. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 25 (12), 33-44
. DeCapua, A. (2008). Grammar for teachers: A guide to American English for native and nonnative speakers. Springer.
. Diep, Q.B. (2005). Ngữ pháp tiếng Việt. Hà Nội: Nhà xuất bản Giáo dục. (Vietnamese grammar. Hanoi: Education Publishing House.)
. Dinh, V. D (2015). Ngữ pháp tiếng Viêt- Từ loại. NXB Đại học và Trung học Chuyên nghiệp, Hà Nội.(Vietnamese grammar – Parts of Speech. Hanoi: University and Professional High School Publishing House)
. Doetjes, J. (2017). The Count/Mass Distinction in Grammar and Cognition. Annual Review of Linguistics, 3 (1), 199-217, 2017.
. Dulay, H., Burt, M., & Krashen, S. (1982). Language two. New York: OUP
. Ellis, R. (1997). Second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. Gass, M.S., & Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. New York. Routledge
. Ghomeshi, J. & Massam, D. (2012) The count mass distinction: Issues and perspectives. In D. Massam (Ed.) Count and mass across languages, 1-8.
. Gil, D. (2005). Numeral classifier. In Haspelmath et al. (Eds.) The World Atlas of Language Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 226-229.
. James, C. (1998). Errors in languages learning and use: Exploring error analysis. London, England: Longman.
. James, C. (2013). Errors in languages learning and use: Exploring error analysis. (6th ed.) Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.
. Kodera, M. (2011). A cross-linguistic study of mass-count distinctions. Humanities and Natural Sciences, 46, (2), 43-52
. Krifka, M. (1986). Nominalreferenz und Zeitkonstitution: Zur Semantik von Massentermen, Pluraltermen und Aspektklassen. [Ph.D. dissertation], Munich University, Germany.
. Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
. Langacker, R.W. (1987). Nouns and verbs, Language, 63 (1), 53-94.
. Langacker, R. W. (1990). Concept, image, and symbol: The Cognitive basis of grammar. Cognitive linguistics research 1. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
. Le, Q. T. (2004). Nghiên cứu đối chiếu các ngôn ngữ. Hà Nội: NXB Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội. [Contrastive Research on Languages. Hanoi: Publisher of Hanoi National University]
. Lyons, J. (1968). Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. Massam, D. (2009). Noun Incorporation: Essentials and Extensions. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3 (4), 1076–1096. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749‐818X.2009.00140.x
. Nguyen T. C. (1975). Từ loại danh từ trong tiếng Việt hiện đại [Nouns in modern Vietnamese]. NXB Khoa học xã hội Hà Nội. Publisher of Social Sciences
. Nguyen T. G. (2015). Dẫn luận ngôn ngữ học (Tái bản lần thứ 12), Hà Nội: Giáo dục Việt Nam. (Introduction to linguistics (2nd ed.), Hanoi: Vietnaese Education)
. Norrish, J. (1987). Language earning and their errors. London: Macmillan Publisher Ltd.
. Odlin, T. (1989). Language transfer. Cross-linguistics influence in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. Odlin, T. (2005). Cross-linguistics influence and conceptual transfer: What are the concepts? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 3-25.
. Radden, G., & Dirven, R. (2007). Cognitive English grammar. John Bejamins. Philadelphia: Amsterdam.
. Zhang, N.N. (2012). Countability and number classifiers in Mandarin Chinese. In D., Massam (Ed.) Count and Mass Across Languages. Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 NHON DANG
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors wishing to include figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
