MAKING SENSE OUT OF U.S. TRADE POLICY OR HIGH-STAKES POKER GAME?

  • richard j hunter Stillman School of Business Seton Hall University
Keywords: U.S. Trade Representative, Trade Barriers, Special 301 Report, Watch List, Priority Watch List, Notorious Markets

Abstract

This paper is a study of the genesis and function of the Office of United States Trade Representative. It describes the National Trade Estimate on Foreign Trade Barriers and the Special 301 Report which delineates countries placed on the Priority Watch List and Watch List for alleged violations relating to U.S. intellectual property rights. The paper also provides a discussion of Notorious Markets, both online and physical, and offers suggestions for the implementation of enforcement strategies to combat piracy and other forms of theft of U.S. intellectual property.

Author Biography

richard j hunter, Stillman School of Business Seton Hall University

Professor of Legal Studies and International Business

Department of Economics and Legal Studies

References

Arie, S. (2013). India remains on US trade “priority watch list” for failing to uphold international drug company patents, BMJ: 346. Available: https://www.bmj.com/content/346/bmj.f2949

Bacchetta, Marc & Bora, B. (2007). Post-Uruguay round market access barriers for industrial products. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Available: http://www.worldcat.org/title/post-uruguay-round-market-access-barriers-for-industrial-products/oclc/48993186

Bala, M.D. (1974). Adjustment assistance under the trade expansion act of 1962. Journal of Law and Economics, 9: 149-179.

Bello, J.H. & Holmer, A.F. (1990). Special 301. Fordham International Law Journal, 14: 874-979.

Borchert, I., Gootiz, B., & Mattoo, A. (2012). Policy barriers to trade in services: evidence from a new database. Policy Research Working Papers (June 2012). Available: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/277401468331247210/Policy-barriers-to-international-trade-in-services-evidence-from-a-new-database

Brown, L.K. & Troutt, E. (2018). A re-analysis of the trade and welfare effects of export subsidies. Applied Economic Letters, 25(18): 420-424.

Bruinsma, J. (2017). World agriculture: towards 2015-2030. London: Routledge.

Bruns, A. (2017). Worried about your IP and market access around the world? Site Selection Magazine (August 2017). Available: https://siteselection.com/LifeSciences/2017/aug/policy-worried-about-your-ip-and-market-access-around-the-world.cfm

Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2018). Employment by major industry sector. Available: https://www.bls.gov/emp/tables/employment-by-major-industry-sector.htm

Buxbaum, P. (2018). USTR releases 2018 special 301 report on intellectual property rights. Global Trade. Available.

http://www.globaltrademag.com/free-trade-agreements/ustr-releases-2018-special-301-report-on-intellectual-property-rights

Chien, L. & Morris, P. (2017). Is U.S. manufacturing really declining? Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (April 11, 2017). Available: https://www.stlouisfed.org/on-the-economy/2017/april/us-manufacturing-really-declining

Claussen, K. (2017). Trading spaces: the changing role of the executive in U.S. trade lawmaking. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 24: 345-368.

Commins, M.M. (ed.) (2013). Understanding United States foreign policy toward Latin America: lessons from a comparison of NAFTA and the Columbian trade promotion agreement. The Latin Americanist, 57(4): 73-96.

Diamond, J., Liptak, K., Newton, P., & Borak, D. (2018). US and Canada reach deal on NAFTA after talks go down to the wire. CNN (October 1, 2018). Available: https://whotv.com/2018/10/01/us-and-canada-reach-deal-on-nafta...

Enoch, D. (2018). USTR says EU going too far in use of geographical indications. AgriPulse (April 27, 2018). Available: https://www.agri-pulse.com/articles/10905-ustr-says-eu-going-too-far-in-use-of-geographical-indications

European Commission. (2015). Report from the commission to the European council: trade and investment report 2015. Available: trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2017/june/tradoc_155642.pdf

Express Pharma. (2018). India remains on priority watch list of USTR’s 2018 special 301 report. Available: http://www.expressbpd.com/pharma/latest-updates/india-remains-on-priority-watch-list-of-ustrs-2018-special-301-report/400620/

Flynn, S. (2010). Special 301 of the trade act of 1974 and global access to medicines. Journal of Generic Medicines, 7(4): 451-472.

Francois, J. & Hoekman, B. (2010). Services trade and policy. Journal of Economic literature, 48(3): 642-692.

Frolich, T.C., Hess, A.E.M., & Calio, V. (2014). 9 most counterfeited products in the USA. USA Today (March 29, 2014). Available: https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2014/03/29/24-7-wall-st-counterfeited-products/7023233/

Graham, K. (2018). U.S. adds Canada to priority watch list on intellectual property. Digital Journal. Available: http://m.digitaljournal.com/news/politics/usa-adds-canada-to-priority-watch-list-on-intellectual-property/article/520963

Helfer, L.R. (2010). Collective management of copyrights and human rights: an uneasy alliance revisited, in Collective management of copyright and related rights, 75-103 (Daniel J. Gervais ed., 2d ed. 2010).

Hoekman, B.M. (2017). Trade in services: opening markets to create opportunities. WIDER Working Paper 2017/31. Available: https://www.wider.unu.edu/publication/trade-services

Holbik, K. (1975). The US trade reform act of 1974. Intereconomics, 10(4): 121-123.

Hosch, W.L. (2018). Piracy: corporate crime. Encyclopedia Britannica. Available: https://www.britannica.com/topic/piracy-copyright-crime (last visited October 29, 2018).

Housman, R. (1994). Democratizing international trade decision-making. Cornell International Law Journal, 27: 699-747.

Hufbauer, G.C. & Moran, T. (2015). Government procurement in US trade agreements. Robert Schuman Center for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSCAS PP 2015/09. Available: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2682578

Hunter, R.J. & Lozada, H.R. (2010). A primer on issues in international trade. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 47: 99-110.

Hunter, R.J., Mest, D., & Shannon, J.H. (2011). A focus on the foreign corrupt practices act [FCPA]: Siemens and Halliburton revisited as indicators of corporate culture. Atlantic Law Journal, 13: 60-90.

Hunter, R.J. & Mest, D. (2015). An update on major enforcement actions under the accounting provisions of the foreign corrupt practices act or FCPA. International Journal of Management Sciences, 6(4): 176-186.

Joo, K-H., Shim, H.S., & Sul, W. (2017). Foreign direct investment in state-owned enterprises. Advances in Economics and Business, 5(5): 265-279.

Kang, J.W. & Ramizo, D. (2017). Impact of sanitary and phytosanitary measures and technical barriers on international trade. Journal of World Trade, 51(4): 539-573.

Kilday, L. (2013). The commission on the theft of American intellectual property: a national security plan to present stolen IP. IP Watchdog (May 24, 2013). Available: http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/05/24/the-commission-on-the-theft-of-american-intellectual-property-a-national-security-plan-to-prevent-stolen-ip/id=40767/

Larch, M. & Lechthaler, W. (2015). Buy national and the business cycle. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 20(5): 1196-1218.

Lefkovitz, N. (2018). A framework for online privacy. Taking Measure (October 16, 2018). Available: https://www.nist.gov/blogs/taking-measure/framework-online-privacy

Lighthizer, R. (2018). 2018 National trade estimate report on foreign trade barriers (March 2018). Available: http://hinrichfoundation.com/resource-center-reports/ustr-2018-national-trade-estimate-report-on-foreign-trade-barriers/

Luo, M. (2018). US China Trade dispute over intellectual property. Master's Projects 586. San Jose State University. Available: http://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_projects/586

Lennon, P.L. (1990). Economic issues under the omnibus trade and competitiveness act of 1988: an overview. University of Miami Inter-American Law Review, 21: 387-408.

Masterson, J.T. (2004). International trademarks and copyrights: enforcement and management. American Bar Association (Section on International Law and Practice).

Chicago, Ill. Available: https://www.americanbar.org/bin/product.route.api?id=214654

Moon, M.A., Javaid, B., Kiran, M., Awan, H.M., & Farooq, A. (2018). Consumer perceptions of counterfeit clothing and apparel products attributes. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 37(7): 794-808.

Moran, J.F. (2011). Overseas private investment corporation: financing and insuring investment in emerging markets. OPIC (November 7, 2011). Available: https://www.oecd.org/env/cc/49098818.pdf

Mullen, J. (2018). After ‘major escalation’ in US-China trade war, what happens next? CNN (Hong Kong). Available: https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/18/politics/china-us-tariffs/index.html

Mulopulos, S. (2018). Digital trade zones: answering impediments to international trade in information. Chapman Law Review, 21: 443-471.

Murina, M. & Nicita, A. (2015). Trading with conditions: the effect of sanitary and phytosanitary measures on the agricultural exports from low-income countries. The World Economy. 1-21. Available: https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/worlde/v40y2017i1p168-181.html

Noonan, C. (2008). Private market access barriers, in The emerging principles of international competitive law. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford Scholarship Online. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207527.001.0001/acprof-9780199207527-chapter-6

Norwood, B. (1969). The Kennedy round: a try at linear trade negotiations. Journal of Law and Economics, 12(2): 297-319.

Office of United States Trade Representative. (2017). 2017 national trade estimate report. Available: https://infogalactic.com/info/Office_of_the_United_States_Trade_Estimate_Report.

Office of United States Trade Representative. (2018a). History of the United States trade representative. Available: https://ustr.gov/about-us-history

Office of the United States Trade Representative. (2018b). USTR releases 2018 special 301 report in intellectual property rights (Press Release). Available: https://ustr.gov/.../2018/april/ustr-releases-2018-special-301-report

Office of United States Trade Representative. (2018c). 2018 Out-of-cycle review of notorious markets (January 11, 2018). Available: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/08/16/2018-17649/2018-special-301-out-of-cycle-review-of-notorious-markets-comment-request

Palmeter, N.D. & Kossl, T.L. (1980). Restructuring executive branch trade responsibilities: a half-step forward. Law & Policy in International Business, 11: 611-ff. Available: https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/geojintl12&div=30&id=&page=

Pyne, P.K. & Roy, S.S. (2018). Does WTO improve market access? May be, but with maturity. Available: http://www.hss.iitb.ac.in/en/event/seminar-does-wto-improve-market-access-may-be-maturity

Selby, J. (2017). Data localization laws: trade barriers or legitimate responses to cybersecurity risks, or both? International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 3(1): 213-232.

Smyth, S., Kerr, W.A., & Phillips, P. (2017). The impact of barriers to trade on investment. Biotechnology Regulation and Trade, 51: 125-146.

Spier, L. (1964). Implications of the 1962 trade expansion act. California Management Review, 6(3): 73-84.

Stanley, M.T. (1990). Cost of capital budgeting for foreign direct investment. Management Finance. 16(2): 13-16.

Stirling, S.T. (2018). Federal trade office releases 2018 national trade estimate report. Available: https://www.newportbeach.com/federal-trade-office-releases-2018-national-trade-estimate-report/

Strong, M. (2017). Enforcement tools in the US government toolbox to support countries’ compliance with copyright obligations. Columbia Journal of Law and Arts, 40: 359-370.

Swanson, A. (2018). U.S.-China trade deficit hits record, fueling trade fight. New York Times (February 6, 2018). Available: https://www.nytimes.com/.../06/us/politics/us-china-trade-deficit.html.

Tangerman. S. (1991). Agriculture in international trade negotiations. Developments in Agricultural Economics, 7: 50-61.

Tiezzi, S. (2018). Is this the start of a US-China trade war? The Diplomat (February 6, 2018). Available: https://thediplomat.com/.../is-this-the-start-of-a-us-china-trade-war

Van Detta, J.A. (2014). Transnational legal services in globalized economies: American leadership, not mere compliance with GATS. Journal of International Business and Law. 13(1): 1-126.

Winniger, P.J. (2002). The office of United States trade representative (thesis). Western Kentucky University. Available: https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/stu_hon_theses/156/

Wiseman, P. (2017). Counterfeiters, hackers cost US up to $600 billion a year. Daily Mail (Associated Press) (February 27, 2017). Available: https://apnews.com/2234bddc68c14ba18d4d403442187c59

Woollacott, E. (2018). Big brands are funding piracy, USTR warns. Forbes (January 13, 2018). Available: https://www.forbes.com/.../13/big-brands-are-funding-piracy-ustr-warns

Wrase, A.M. (2000). U.S. bilateral agreements and the protection of intellectual property rights in foreign countries: effective U.S. intellectual property interests or a way out of addressing the issue? Dickinson Journal of International Law, 19: 245-267.

STATUTORY MATERIALS

American Espionage Act of 1917. (1917). 18 U.S.C. Chapter 37, 18 U.S.C. Section 792 et seq.

Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988. (1988). Pub. L. 100-418.

Tariff Act of 1930 (Hawley Smoot Tariff). (1930). 19 U.S.C. Ch. 4.

Trade and Development Act of 2000. (2000). Pub. L. 106-200, 114 Stat. 251.

Trade and Tariff Act of 1984. (1984). Pub. L. 98-573.

Trade Expansion Act of 1962. (1962) Pub. L. 87–794, 76 Stat. 872.

Uruguay Round Agreements Act. (1994). Pub. L. 103–465.

Published
2019-03-26
How to Cite
hunter, richard j. (2019). MAKING SENSE OUT OF U.S. TRADE POLICY OR HIGH-STAKES POKER GAME?. Archives of Business Research, 7(3), 76-86. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.73.6331