Boardroom or War Room: An Expectational Analysis of CFO – Executive Board Relationships in Adventist Local Conferences


  • Theodore Brown Sr. Oakwood University



Board Governance, CEO (Chief Executive Officer/President), CFO (Chief Financial Officer/Treasurer), Executive Board Members, General Conference (GC), leadership, North American Division (NAD), perceptions, CFO-CEO relationships, Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SARBOX


The Board of Directors represents the highest level of organizational governance, and is the governing body in corporate organizations; primarily responsible for the oversite of the operations and interests of the shareholders and/or stakeholders of the business and/or entity.  The basis of this quantitative paper was instigated by the thought that the perceptions of Seventh-day Adventist (SDA) Local Conference leadership consequentially impact how the relationships of Chief Financial Officer(s) (CFOs/Treasurers) and their Executive Board(s) are viewed and interact based upon perceived expectations.  The corporate relationships between the Chief Financial Officer(s) (CFOs) and Executive Board(s) have continued to emerge as a result of changing societal and global expectations of what is expected from organizations from shareholders, stakeholders and governments.  The 21st century inception of significant governmental regulations mainly called the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was passed to address and counteract emerging and widespread corruption in large USA businesses and organizations, extensive financial reporting fraud, institutional mis-management and material non-compliance in accounting practices.  This legislative act redefined the relational expectations and practices of board governance and board member duties, Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) corporate and organizational accountability.   The magnitude of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has also affected the relational practices of Chief Financial Officers (CFOs/Treasurers) and Executive Board(s) in Seventh-day Adventist (SDA) conferences.  Data was collected from a purposeful sample of N=399 at fifty-seven Seventh-day Adventist (SDA) Local Conferences in the North American Division territory inclusive of Bermuda, Canada and the United States of America (USA) with a 55% response rate.  A Mixed-Methods sequential exploratory research design utilizing Descriptive Statistics, ANOVAs and Chi-Square Analysis was used focusing on the quantitative aspects and results of this study.  Discussion and Conclusion are explored and disclosed, and the Implications of Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and Executive Board relationships on organizational governance and accountability pertaining to the overall organizational climate, effectiveness, operational efficiency are discussed. 

Author Biography

Theodore Brown Sr., Oakwood University

Dr. Theodore Brown Sr., PhD

Professor of Management and Leadership

Department of Business and Information Systems

School of Business


Adventist World – NAD (2013, June). Treasurer says north american tithe

up 1 percent, 4.4 percent in other regions. p. 5.

Aquillio, M. (2016, February). Sarbanes-Oxley and the fishing expedition.

ASBBS Proceedings. 23.1: 31-40. San Diego: San Diego American

Society of Business and Behavioral Sciences.

Banerjee, G. and Kaya, H. D. (2017). Short-term and long-term impact

of sarbanes-oxley act on director commitment and composition of

corporate board committees. Journal of Financial Management and

Analysis. 30(1): 2017: 1-11.

Bhuiyan, Md. B.U. (2015). Do problems directors affect firm operating

performance? Asian Review of Accounting. 23.2: 170-185.

Boerner, H. (2015, March/April). Importance of intangibles reflected in

esg performance metrics for a growing number of investors.

Corporate Finance Review. 19.5: 28-32.

Brown, T. (2005). A study of the expectations of treasurers as chief

financial officers in local conferences in the north American division of

seventh-day Adventist: Perceptions of roles, responsibilities and

relationships. Andrews University. Berrien Springs, MI. Dissertation.


Buckingham, M. and Coffman, C. (1999). First break all the rules: What

the world’s greatest managers do differently. New York: Simon &


Colvin, G. (2013, May). Inside the boardroom: The party is over!

Fortune. 219-224.

Corporate Finance (2005, April). Cfo to ceo. Corporate Finance. 1.

Creswell, J. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed

methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. p. 210.

Creswell, J. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed

methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Dingle, D. T. (2014, July/August). Where are the blacks in corporate

boardrooms? Black Enterprise. 66-90.

Dotlich, D.L. (2006). Developing cfos as whole leaders. Financial

Executive. 22.6.

Elsbach, K.D. and Bechky, B.A. (2009). Qualitative Organizational

Research (Vol. 2). Charlotte, NC. Information Age Publishing, Inc.

Eriksson P. and Kovalainen, A. (2008). Qualitative Methods in Business

Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Franklin, M. (2016, July). Sarbanes-Oxley section 404: A historical

analysis. Journal of Accounting and Finance. 16.4: 56-59.

Gwin, B.W.; Lesueur, A. and Sanders, J. (2018). Four approaches of

‘superaccelerator’ boards: Fast-growing companies provide

governance formulas for accelerating value. Directors & Boards

Winter 2017: 52+. Business Insights: Essentials. Web. 11 Jan. 2018.

Heffes, E.M. (2007, October). Audit committee to cfo: Can we talk?

Financial Executive. 23.8: 28-32.

Holley, C. (2018 January). Essentials for the board-cfo relationship:

Here is a set of questions boards can use to explore and define the

attributes they might want from a cfo. Directors & Boards 2017 First

Quarter, Vol. 41 Issue 2. P16-17. 2p.

Joseph, S.M. (2015, March). Board independence, corporate governance,

and fraud: A review of the empirical research and direction for the

future. Oil, Gas & Quarterly. 63.3:433.

Karabus, A. (2017, March/April). Cfo evolution. Chain Store Age. Vol.

Issue 2, p26-26. 1/4p.

Krell, E. (2005, May). Sarbanes fatigue strikes the boardroom. Business

Finance. 11.5: 45-48.

Krell, E. (2006, August). Tuning up the cfo-board relationship. Business

Finance. 12.8: 17.

Krishnan, G., Ramam, K.K., Yang, K., and Yu, W. (2011, September).

Cfo/ceo – board social ties, sarbanes-oaley, and earnings

management. Accounting Horizons. 25.3:537-557.

Kulshrestha, T. (2017, September). Corporate finance: The new cfo.

Global Finance. 30-31.

Linden, M. (2012, October). The modern-day cfo: Down to business.

Financial Executive. 28.8:49-51.

Littlewood, S. (2017, January). Boxed out of strategic thinking? Global

Finance. Vol. 31 Issue 1, p52-53. 2p.

Madhani, P. M. (2017). Diverse roles of corporate board: A review of

various corporate governance theories. IUP Journal of Corporate

Governance. Vol. 16 Issue 2. P7-28. 22p.

Malik, M.S. and Makhdoom, D.D. (2016). Does corporate governance

beget firm performance in fortune global 500 companies? Corporate

Governance. 16.6:747-764.

McCann, D. (2017, October). Research refutes sarbanes-oxley critics:

Strong evidence exist of a link between auditor-identified weak

internal controls and subsequent fraud cases. CFO. Vol. 33 Issue 8,

p10-11. 2p.

Merker, C. K. (2018, January). Governance matters: Pension plan board

effectiveness. Benefits Magazine. 28-33.

Moran, J. (2016, June). Bringing board performance into focus.

Accountancy Ireland. 48.3: 64-65.

Nardi, P.M. (2003). Doing Survey Research: A Guide to Quantitative

Methods. Boston, MA. Allyn and Bacon.

North American Division Working Policy (2015-2016). North American

Division of the General Conference; Silver Springs, MD.

Ode, F. (2016, May/June). Who’s leading your company? Look for the

chief problem officer. Construction Accounting & Taxation. 26.3:6-10.

Raymond, D. (2018, January). Measuring impact in the boardroom: B

corps setting the standard for measuring sri. Directors & Boards

Winter 2017: 33+. Business Insights: Essentials. Web. 10 Jan. 2018.

Seventh-day Adventist Accounting Manual, (2011 Edition/January).

General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists. Silver Spring,

Maryland. p. 4 -7.

Snell, R. (2017, May/June). Compliance officer independence is still an

issue after roughly 22 years: Conflicted reporting relationships

continue to exist in compliance. Journal of Health Care Compliance.

Vol. 19 Issue 3, p3-4. 2p. 1Black and White Photograph.

Steinhoff, J.C. and Price, L.A. (2011, Spring). From back room to board

room: Federal cfo role in managing the cost of government. Public

Manager. 40.1: 56-61.

Swedberg, J. (2015, October). Making it work. Credit Union

Management. 38.10: 40-42.

Talaulicar, T.; Judge, W.Q. and Mallon, M. (2017). What drives

prescriptions of board involvement in corporate governance codes?

Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings. Vol. 2017

Issue 1, p1-1. 1p.

Toumi, N; Benkraiem, R and Hamrouni, A. (2016). Board director

disciplinary and cognitive influence on corporate value creation.

Corporate Governance. 16.3: 564-578.

Venkatraman, S. (2015, February). Business partnering: When does it

work? Strategic Finance. 96.8: 47-48, 51-53.

Vercic, D. and Zerfass, A. (2016). A comparative excellence framework

for communication management. Journal of Communication

Management; London. 20.4: 270-288.

Vollmer, S. (2017, April). How a cfo can become great. Journal of

Accountancy: Management Accounting. 36-39.

Westfall, C. (2015). Cfo of the future: Strategy & substance. Financial

Executive. 31.3: 50-56.

Whiteman, R. (2015, September). Necessary medicine. Public Finance.


Williams, J. (2012, January). From cfo to ceo transitioning to the top

spot. Healthcare Financial Management. 66.1: 58-63.




How to Cite

Brown Sr., T. (2018). Boardroom or War Room: An Expectational Analysis of CFO – Executive Board Relationships in Adventist Local Conferences. Archives of Business Research, 6(4), 84–90.