Boardroom or War Room: An Expectational Analysis of CFO – Executive Board Relationships in Adventist Local Conferences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.64.4414Keywords:
Board Governance, CEO (Chief Executive Officer/President), CFO (Chief Financial Officer/Treasurer), Executive Board Members, General Conference (GC), leadership, North American Division (NAD), perceptions, CFO-CEO relationships, Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SARBOXAbstract
The Board of Directors represents the highest level of organizational governance, and is the governing body in corporate organizations; primarily responsible for the oversite of the operations and interests of the shareholders and/or stakeholders of the business and/or entity. The basis of this quantitative paper was instigated by the thought that the perceptions of Seventh-day Adventist (SDA) Local Conference leadership consequentially impact how the relationships of Chief Financial Officer(s) (CFOs/Treasurers) and their Executive Board(s) are viewed and interact based upon perceived expectations. The corporate relationships between the Chief Financial Officer(s) (CFOs) and Executive Board(s) have continued to emerge as a result of changing societal and global expectations of what is expected from organizations from shareholders, stakeholders and governments. The 21st century inception of significant governmental regulations mainly called the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was passed to address and counteract emerging and widespread corruption in large USA businesses and organizations, extensive financial reporting fraud, institutional mis-management and material non-compliance in accounting practices. This legislative act redefined the relational expectations and practices of board governance and board member duties, Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) corporate and organizational accountability. The magnitude of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has also affected the relational practices of Chief Financial Officers (CFOs/Treasurers) and Executive Board(s) in Seventh-day Adventist (SDA) conferences. Data was collected from a purposeful sample of N=399 at fifty-seven Seventh-day Adventist (SDA) Local Conferences in the North American Division territory inclusive of Bermuda, Canada and the United States of America (USA) with a 55% response rate. A Mixed-Methods sequential exploratory research design utilizing Descriptive Statistics, ANOVAs and Chi-Square Analysis was used focusing on the quantitative aspects and results of this study. Discussion and Conclusion are explored and disclosed, and the Implications of Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and Executive Board relationships on organizational governance and accountability pertaining to the overall organizational climate, effectiveness, operational efficiency are discussed.
References
Adventist World – NAD (2013, June). Treasurer says north american tithe
up 1 percent, 4.4 percent in other regions. p. 5.
Aquillio, M. (2016, February). Sarbanes-Oxley and the fishing expedition.
ASBBS Proceedings. 23.1: 31-40. San Diego: San Diego American
Society of Business and Behavioral Sciences.
Banerjee, G. and Kaya, H. D. (2017). Short-term and long-term impact
of sarbanes-oxley act on director commitment and composition of
corporate board committees. Journal of Financial Management and
Analysis. 30(1): 2017: 1-11.
Bhuiyan, Md. B.U. (2015). Do problems directors affect firm operating
performance? Asian Review of Accounting. 23.2: 170-185.
Boerner, H. (2015, March/April). Importance of intangibles reflected in
esg performance metrics for a growing number of investors.
Corporate Finance Review. 19.5: 28-32.
Brown, T. (2005). A study of the expectations of treasurers as chief
financial officers in local conferences in the north American division of
seventh-day Adventist: Perceptions of roles, responsibilities and
relationships. Andrews University. Berrien Springs, MI. Dissertation.
Pg.102-103.
Buckingham, M. and Coffman, C. (1999). First break all the rules: What
the world’s greatest managers do differently. New York: Simon &
Schuster.
Colvin, G. (2013, May). Inside the boardroom: The party is over!
Fortune. 219-224.
Corporate Finance (2005, April). Cfo to ceo. Corporate Finance. 1.
Creswell, J. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed
methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. p. 210.
Creswell, J. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed
methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dingle, D. T. (2014, July/August). Where are the blacks in corporate
boardrooms? Black Enterprise. 66-90.
Dotlich, D.L. (2006). Developing cfos as whole leaders. Financial
Executive. 22.6.
Elsbach, K.D. and Bechky, B.A. (2009). Qualitative Organizational
Research (Vol. 2). Charlotte, NC. Information Age Publishing, Inc.
Eriksson P. and Kovalainen, A. (2008). Qualitative Methods in Business
Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Franklin, M. (2016, July). Sarbanes-Oxley section 404: A historical
analysis. Journal of Accounting and Finance. 16.4: 56-59.
Gwin, B.W.; Lesueur, A. and Sanders, J. (2018). Four approaches of
‘superaccelerator’ boards: Fast-growing companies provide
governance formulas for accelerating value. Directors & Boards
Winter 2017: 52+. Business Insights: Essentials. Web. 11 Jan. 2018.
Heffes, E.M. (2007, October). Audit committee to cfo: Can we talk?
Financial Executive. 23.8: 28-32.
Holley, C. (2018 January). Essentials for the board-cfo relationship:
Here is a set of questions boards can use to explore and define the
attributes they might want from a cfo. Directors & Boards 2017 First
Quarter, Vol. 41 Issue 2. P16-17. 2p.
Joseph, S.M. (2015, March). Board independence, corporate governance,
and fraud: A review of the empirical research and direction for the
future. Oil, Gas & Quarterly. 63.3:433.
Karabus, A. (2017, March/April). Cfo evolution. Chain Store Age. Vol.
Issue 2, p26-26. 1/4p.
Krell, E. (2005, May). Sarbanes fatigue strikes the boardroom. Business
Finance. 11.5: 45-48.
Krell, E. (2006, August). Tuning up the cfo-board relationship. Business
Finance. 12.8: 17.
Krishnan, G., Ramam, K.K., Yang, K., and Yu, W. (2011, September).
Cfo/ceo – board social ties, sarbanes-oaley, and earnings
management. Accounting Horizons. 25.3:537-557.
Kulshrestha, T. (2017, September). Corporate finance: The new cfo.
Global Finance. 30-31.
Linden, M. (2012, October). The modern-day cfo: Down to business.
Financial Executive. 28.8:49-51.
Littlewood, S. (2017, January). Boxed out of strategic thinking? Global
Finance. Vol. 31 Issue 1, p52-53. 2p.
Madhani, P. M. (2017). Diverse roles of corporate board: A review of
various corporate governance theories. IUP Journal of Corporate
Governance. Vol. 16 Issue 2. P7-28. 22p.
Malik, M.S. and Makhdoom, D.D. (2016). Does corporate governance
beget firm performance in fortune global 500 companies? Corporate
Governance. 16.6:747-764.
McCann, D. (2017, October). Research refutes sarbanes-oxley critics:
Strong evidence exist of a link between auditor-identified weak
internal controls and subsequent fraud cases. CFO. Vol. 33 Issue 8,
p10-11. 2p.
Merker, C. K. (2018, January). Governance matters: Pension plan board
effectiveness. Benefits Magazine. 28-33.
Moran, J. (2016, June). Bringing board performance into focus.
Accountancy Ireland. 48.3: 64-65.
Nardi, P.M. (2003). Doing Survey Research: A Guide to Quantitative
Methods. Boston, MA. Allyn and Bacon.
North American Division Working Policy (2015-2016). North American
Division of the General Conference; Silver Springs, MD.
Ode, F. (2016, May/June). Who’s leading your company? Look for the
chief problem officer. Construction Accounting & Taxation. 26.3:6-10.
Raymond, D. (2018, January). Measuring impact in the boardroom: B
corps setting the standard for measuring sri. Directors & Boards
Winter 2017: 33+. Business Insights: Essentials. Web. 10 Jan. 2018.
Seventh-day Adventist Accounting Manual, (2011 Edition/January).
General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists. Silver Spring,
Maryland. p. 4 -7.
Snell, R. (2017, May/June). Compliance officer independence is still an
issue after roughly 22 years: Conflicted reporting relationships
continue to exist in compliance. Journal of Health Care Compliance.
Vol. 19 Issue 3, p3-4. 2p. 1Black and White Photograph.
Steinhoff, J.C. and Price, L.A. (2011, Spring). From back room to board
room: Federal cfo role in managing the cost of government. Public
Manager. 40.1: 56-61.
Swedberg, J. (2015, October). Making it work. Credit Union
Management. 38.10: 40-42.
Talaulicar, T.; Judge, W.Q. and Mallon, M. (2017). What drives
prescriptions of board involvement in corporate governance codes?
Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings. Vol. 2017
Issue 1, p1-1. 1p.
Toumi, N; Benkraiem, R and Hamrouni, A. (2016). Board director
disciplinary and cognitive influence on corporate value creation.
Corporate Governance. 16.3: 564-578.
Venkatraman, S. (2015, February). Business partnering: When does it
work? Strategic Finance. 96.8: 47-48, 51-53.
Vercic, D. and Zerfass, A. (2016). A comparative excellence framework
for communication management. Journal of Communication
Management; London. 20.4: 270-288.
Vollmer, S. (2017, April). How a cfo can become great. Journal of
Accountancy: Management Accounting. 36-39.
Westfall, C. (2015). Cfo of the future: Strategy & substance. Financial
Executive. 31.3: 50-56.
Whiteman, R. (2015, September). Necessary medicine. Public Finance.
:17.
Williams, J. (2012, January). From cfo to ceo transitioning to the top
spot. Healthcare Financial Management. 66.1: 58-63.
