A Study of Marketing Strategies for Electricity Plans Considering Renewable Energy Using Latent Class Analysis

Authors

  • Kirana Horie Department of Social Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Japan
  • Sun Jing Department of Social Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Japan
  • Junpei Marui Department of Social Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Japan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.128.17309

Keywords:

Global environmental risk, latent class analysis, electricity rate plan selection

Abstract

Demand for renewable energy is increasing. Along with this, the burden of electricity charges as levies is also increasing. There are many complaints about this levy. However, future levy prices are also expected to rise. Among these, what can be said to be important is how to get people to choose a renewable energy plan, even if there is a burden. In the research so far, there is no research that presents additional information on global environmental risk information, measures the impact of the information effect, or creates a new power plan that suits consumers. Therefore, in this study, in order to evaluate the influence of global environmental risk information on consumer perception, we extract stated preference data by selective conjoint survey and estimate consumer preference by latent class model. We decided to verify the extent to which the presentation of global environmental risk information is effective in improving consumer receptivity and increasing awareness of renewable energy plan selection. In addition to that, the purpose of this research is to simultaneously understand what items consumers place importance on when choosing a price plan for each segment, and to devise marketing strategies that match the characteristics of each segment.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-23

How to Cite

Horie, K., Jing, S., & Marui, J. (2024). A Study of Marketing Strategies for Electricity Plans Considering Renewable Energy Using Latent Class Analysis. Archives of Business Research, 12(8), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.128.17309