Starting and Subsequent Earnings of Young Workers in Different Sized Firms

Authors

  • Michael Tannen University of the District of Columbia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.101.11500

Keywords:

Young Worker Pay, Firm Size and Earnings, Early Career Advancement

Abstract

Based upon the highly innovative Project TALENT Longitudinal Database, this study tracks the starting earnings and subsequent early earnings growth of young males who began their work careers at either a smaller (<100 employees) or larger private firm more than a generation ago.  Prior evidence based upon less rich databases found that earnings were systematically higher in larger firms but did not have access to many other variables that could affect projected earnings which are available in the TALENT database. Earnings regressions are estimated here including not only usual explanatory variables of years of schooling and labor market experience, but also adding other variables pertaining to prior job experience, military service, IQ, socioeconomic background and some other factors.  The findings indicate that while starting earnings of those in this database were indeed higher in larger firms, the gap evaporated fairly quickly with projected earnings of those in smaller firms featuring a small earnings premium. The results here suggest guidance based upon the body of prior evidence may have been less reliable than thought, and that evidence itself may not provide as useful a baseline as desired for subsequent research addressing whether this pattern continues for recent cohorts.

References

Becker, Gary. Human Capital, Second Edition. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1975.

_____ and Stigler, George J. ”Law Enforcement, Malfeasance and Compensation of Enforcers,” The Journal of Legal Studies, 3, No. 1, January 1974, 1-18.

Borjas, George J. “Job Mobility and Earnings Over the Life Cycle,” Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 34, No. 3 April 1981, 365-376.

Doeringer, Peter B. and Piore, Michael J. Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath and Co., 1971.

Dunn, L. F. “work Disutility and Compensating Differentials: Estimation of Factors in the Link , 475-492.Between Wages and Firm Size,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 68, No. 1, February 1986, 67-73.

Heckman, James J. “The Common Structure of Statistical Models of Truncation, Sample Selection and Limited Dependent Variables and a Simple Estimator for Such Models,” Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5, 1976.

Lazear, Edward P. “Why is There Mandatory Retirement?” Journal of Political Economy, 87, No. 6, December 1979.

Lester, Richard. “Pay Differentials by Size of Establishment,” Industrial Relations, 7, October 1967, 57-67.

Masters, Stanley H. “Wages and Plant Size: An Interindustry Analysis,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 51, No, 3¸August 1969, 341-345.

Mellow, Wesley. “Employer Size and Wages,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 64, No. 3, August 1982, 495-500.

______ “Employer Size, Unionism and Wages,” Research in Labor Economics, 5, Supp. 2, 1983, 253-282.

Meyer, Robert H. and David A. Wise. “High School Preparation and Early Labor Force Experience,” in The Youth Unemployment Problem, edited by Richard B. Freeman and David A. Wise. Chicago: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1982, 277-239.

Mincer, Jacob. Schooling, Experience and Earnings. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1974.

Topel, Robert. “Job Mobility. Search and Earnings Growth: A Reinterpretation of Human Capital Earnings Functions,” Research in Labor Economics, 8, Part A, 1986, 199-233.

Schiller, Bradley R. Early Jobs and Training: The Role of Small Business. Final Report to the Small Business Administration. Washington, D.C. Dec. 1986.

. Wise, Lauress L., McLaughlin, Donald H., and Steel Lauri. Project TALENT Data Bank Handbook, Revised Edition. Palo Alto: American Institutes for Research, May 1979.

Downloads

Published

2022-01-13

How to Cite

Tannen, M. (2022). Starting and Subsequent Earnings of Young Workers in Different Sized Firms. Archives of Business Research, 10(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.101.11500