COMMUNICATION STRATEGY TO ENCOURAGE EMPLOYEE PARTICIPATION FOR OSH PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT AT PT GLOBAL DAIRI ALAMI SUBANG WEST JAWA PROVINCE INDONESIA

Authors

  • Kholil Kholil Sahid university
  • Masjuli

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.911.11209

Keywords:

Organization communication, business continuity, employee participation, Occupational Safety and Health performance

Abstract

Indonesia with total population reaching 264 million persons is a very potential market share for food products. To meet nutrition needs, PT GLOBAL DAIRI ALAMI was established in 2017 as a milk producer in Indonesia. This company engages in two main activities, i.e. land farming for dairy cow breeding and factory to process the milk with pasteurization and Ultra High Temperature methods before the products are launched to the markets for public consumption via sale representatives.

As a new venture, the Company encounters a lot of problems, which include in relation to organization communication in performing Occupational Safety and Health Management System. This Safety and Health Management System is not yet soundly implemented and no communication procedure has been put in place.

The objective of this study is to select the most appropriate communication strategy in improving Occupational Safety and Health performance subject to the existing objective conditions using Analytical Hierarchy Process method. Data is collected from discussion with the experts including the owner, board of directors, managers, section heads, and local government officials. The study results show that the owner of company becomes the leading actor in building communication strategies, followed by employees with scores 0.368 and

0.348 respectively. Factor that becomes the first priority for the company is business continuity with budget availability to follow. Occupational Safety and Health training is a priority program necessary to implement Occupational Safety and Health Management System. Based on multi criteria : actor, factor and program, priority strategy necessary to improve OSH performance is to encourage employee participation.

References

Ade Putra, Ricky. Communication Strategy of Safety Division in Promoting Awareness on Occupational Health Safety and Environment (OHSE) in PT Peranti Nusa Bahari Balikpapan., 2017

Carrillo, Maria Victoria. 2014. Strategic Communication in the communications environment of today’s organizations. Spain: Universidad de Extremadura

Invernizzi, Emanuele and Stefania Romenti. 2011. Strategic Communication and Decision- Making Processes Toward the Communication Oriented Organization. Italy: IULM University

Masuku, Cave., Audrey Chitsika and Painos Moyo. 2014. Organizational communication strategies used by Unki Mines for community engagement and development. USA: IJPSS

Masuku, Caven, Chitsika, Audri dan Moyo, Painos. Organization Strategies Used By UNKI Mines for Community Engagement and Development, 2014

Miller, Katherine. 2003. Organizational Communication: Approaches and Processes (Third Edition). USA: Thomson Wadsworth

Minister of Manpower of the Republik of Indonesia. 1987. Regulation of The Minister of Manpower of The Republic Of Indonesia Number: PER.04/MEN/1987 about Committee of Occupational Safety and Health. Republic of Indonesia: Ministry of Manpower.

Pace, R. Wayne dan Faules. 2018. Organization Communication: Strategy in Improving Company Performance. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Parhusip, Jadiaman. 2019. The Application of Analytical Hierachy Process (AHP) Method in the Design of Decision Support System for the Nomination of Candidate Non-Cash Food Aids Beneficiaries (BPNT) in Palangka Raya Municipality, Information Technology Journal.

Purnama Dewi, Hayuning. 2017. Communication Strategy to Improve Employee Performance (Case Study PT PJB in Surabaya).

Downloads

Published

2021-11-26

How to Cite

Kholil, K., & Masjuli. (2021). COMMUNICATION STRATEGY TO ENCOURAGE EMPLOYEE PARTICIPATION FOR OSH PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT AT PT GLOBAL DAIRI ALAMI SUBANG WEST JAWA PROVINCE INDONESIA. Archives of Business Research, 9(11), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.911.11209