Data Analysis Application to Investigate Relationships between Metacognition and Learning Styles

  • Anass Hsissi LAVETE – e-learning Research Team, University of science & technology, University Hassan I, SETTAT, Morocco
  • Hakim Allali LAVETE – e-learning Research Team, University of science & technology, University Hassan I, SETTAT, Morocco
  • Abdelmajid Hajami LAVETE – e-learning Research Team, University of science & technology, University Hassan I, SETTAT, Morocco
Keywords: component, learning styles, metacognition, data analysis, PCA, learning environment

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine if learning styles predict effectiveness in learning. Participants of the study consisted of 80 students selected from different classes of the university of science and Technology –Settat, Morocco, two questionnaires on learning styles and metacognition related to reading and comprehension were handed out to members of the sample during academic year 2016/2017. Data analysis techniques were used to understand our dataset; principal component analysis was used to discover significant patterns within data. Results indicate that there are significant relations between the dimensions of learning styles, metacognition and performance in comprehension activity. Results also indicate that learning styles significantly explain and predict all sub-dimensions of metacognition.

As perspective for our research, we tend to offer to each student the appropriate environment and conditions to enhance learning, in the conclusion we will discuss the implications and recommendations for designing an adaptive learning and intelligent environment based on an identification of students’ profiles.

 

References

(1) J.H.FLAVELL, 1979. METACOGNITION AND COGNITIVE MONITORING: A NEW AREA OF COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENTAL INQUIRY. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 34(10), 906-911.

(2) Nelson & Narens, 1994. Why investigate metacognition ? In J.Metcalfe & AP. Shimamura (Eds). Metacognition: knowing about knowing (pp. 1-26). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

(3) Schraw & Dennison, 1994. Assessing metacognition awareness, Contemporary Educational Psychology,19, 460-475

(4) Pintrich, & Zeidner, 2000. The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. Handbook of self-regulation (pp, 452-494), San Diego, CA: Academic Press

(5) Harris, T.L, & Hodges, R.E, 1995 . The literacy dictionary: The vocabulary of reading and writing. Newark, DE: internationai Reading Association

(6) Livingstone .J.A, 1996. Effects of metacognitive instruction on strategy use of college students. Unpublished manuscript, State University of New York at Buffalo.

(7) Caliskan, M., & Sunbul, A, 2011. The effects of learning strategies instruction on meta-cognitive knowledge, using meta-cognitive skills and academic achievement, primary education sixth grade Turkish course sample. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 11(1), 148-153

(8) Hoskin, P. W. O, 2000. Affecting increased student achievement in geoscience education by instruction in metacognition: A small class case study. Retrieved from http://www.usq.edu. au/electpub/ejist/docs/Vol7_no2/ CurrentPractice/Affect_ student_ach.htm

(9) Baumann & Duffy, 1997 Engaged Reading for Pleasure and Learning: A Report from the National Reading Research Center.

(10) Downing, K., Kwong, T., Chan, S., Lam, T. and Downing, W, 2009. Problem-based learning and the development of metacognition. Higher Education, 57 (5), 609-621.

(11) Singhal, 2001. Reading proficiency, reading strategies, metacognitive awareness and L2 readers. Reading Matrix, 1-9

(12) Oxford, R. L, 1990. Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. USA: Heinle & Heinle

(13) Bianco, M, 2010. La compréhension des textes : peut-on l’apprendre et l’enseigner ? In M. Crahay & M. Dutrevis (Eds.), Psychologie des apprentissages scolaires, (pp. 229-256). Bruxelles: De Boeck.

(14) Nelson, S., & Conner, C, 2008. Developing self-directed learners. Retrieved January 15, 2008

(15) R. Felder and J.Spurlin. “Applications, Reliability, and Validity of the Index of Learning Styles,”

(16) Efklides, 2006. Metacognition and affect: What can

metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process?. Educational Research Review, 1, 3-14

(17) Mokhtari and Sheorey, 2001. Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29, 431-449.

(18) I.T.Jolliffe. Principal component analysis, Second Edition, Springer, 2nd ed. P.cm – Springer series in statistics, ISBN 0-387-95442-2

(19). Jackson, J.E . 1991, A user’s guide to Principal Components. New York : Wiley.

Published
2017-09-01
Section
Special Issue : 1st International Conference on Affective computing, Machine Learning and Intelligent Systems