COVID-19 Research Comparative Outcome looking through Real-World Evidence Vs. Clinical Trials
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/jbemi.91.11762Keywords:
RCTs, RWD, COVID-19, regulatory decisionAbstract
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard because of their conventional study design, accurately defined endpoints, and high-quality evidence to define any cause-effect relationships. On the other hand, Real-world Data (RWD) relates to the collection of data pertaining to health status of the patient and/or delivery of routine health care. As the sources of RWD are becoming vast, Real-World Evidence (RWE) studies are gaining increasing attention. RWE can emerge as the backbone for regulatory decision-making in clinical research by providing adequate scientific evidence. A lot of RWE studies have been conducted in COVID-19, where a variety of repurposed drugs have been tested in real-world settings for the treatment and management of COVID-19. The current need is to work on a Hybrid trial methodology combining the most important parts of traditional RCTs and observational study designs to infer the RWE.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Niveditha Hariharan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.