Communicative Behavior Retrospective Patterns Among Students During Lab Practice

Main Article Content

Edgardo Ruiz Carrillo
Samuel Meraz

Abstract

The aim of this work is to detect the existence of communicative interaction patterns among Biology students during lab practice. This, based on the analysis of the conversations held among them. Observational methodology was used. An iterative and detailed category system thoroughly was developed as an observation tool, and was later put through a process of re-categorization. A total of six sessions were observed; each one lasting one hour. The intercessional sequential analysis was used with the aid of the program SDIS-GSEQ. The results show that it is highly important for the students the use of question-answer (IAE) in its different modalities: first, in probability of occurrence, are the categories of Persuading and Proposing, the next significant sequential probabilities are: Evaluating, Confirming, and Confusing; followed in sequential occurrence order by: Arguing, Classifying, Correcting, Clarifying, and Suggesting. Last in sequential inhibitory occurrence are: Creating an Opinion, Directing, and Evaluating. These are the particular ways in which students encourage participation during lab practice, opening their minds to their classmates’ feedback, leading to questions and answers that create new discussion topics and increase learning opportunities. 

Article Details

How to Cite
Carrillo, E. R., & Meraz, S. (2014). Communicative Behavior Retrospective Patterns Among Students During Lab Practice. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 1(3), 105. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.13.183
Section
Articles

References

Anguera, M.T., Blanco, A. &Losada, J.L. (2001). Diseñosobservacionales, cuestión clave en el proceso de la metodologíaobservacional.Metodología de lasCiencias del Comportamiento, 3(2), 135-160.
Arias iPujol, E. (2003).Estudiobservacional de la in- teracció en ungrup de psicoterapiad’orientaciópsicoanalítica, a partir de l’anàlisis de la conversa. Tesis Doctoral no publicada. Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona.
Bakeman, R. (1978). Untangling streams of behavior: Sequential analysis of observation data. In G.P. Sackett (Ed.) Observing Behavior, Vol. 2: Data co- llection and analysis methods (pp. 63-78). Balti- more: University of Park Press.
Bakeman, R. & Quera, V. (1996).Análisis de la interacción.Análisissecuencial con SDIS y GSEQ. Madrid: Ra-Ma.
Bakeman, R; Adamson, L. B. &Strisik, P. (1989). Lags and logs: Statistical approaches to interaction. En M. H. Bornstein & J. Bruner (eds.), Interaction in human development (Traducción V. Quera). Laurence Eribaum: Hilisdale, 241-260.
Bakeman, R. & Brown, J. V. (1977). Behavioral dialogues: An approach to the assessment of mother-infant interaction. Child Development, 48,195-203.
Bakeman, R. &Dabbs, J. M. (1976). Social interaction observed: Some approaches to the analysis of behavior streams. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2, 335-345.
Bakeman, R. &Gottman, J. (1986). Observing interaction: An introduction to Sequential Analysis. Traducciónespañola en Ed. Morata, 1989. Nueva York: Cambridge Universiy Press.
Bakeman, R. &Quera, V. (1995).Analyzing Interaction: Sequential Analysis with SDIS and GSEQ. Nueva York: Cambridge Universiy Press.
Bakeman, R. &Quera, V. (1992). SDIS: A sequential data interchange standard. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 24(4), 554-559.
Barnes, D. (1992). From communication to curriculum. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/ Cook.
Cazden, C. (1988). Classroom Discourse. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Coll, C. & Onrubia, J. (2001). Estrategiasdiscursivas y recursossemióticos en la cons- trucción de significadoscompartidos entre profesores y alumnos.Investigación en la escuela, 45, 7-19.
Gimeno, A., Anguera, M.T., Berzosa, A. y Ramírez, L. (2006). Detección de patrones interactivos en la comunicación de familias con hijos adolescentes. Psicothema, 18 (4), 785-790.
Gorospe, G., Hernández Mendo, A., Anguera, M.T., y Martínez de Santos, R. (2005). Desarrollo y optimización de una herramienta observacional en el tenis de individuales. Psicothema, 17 (1), 123-127.
Green, J., & Dixon, C. (1993). Introduction to “Talking knowledge into being: Discursive and social practices in classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 5 (3&4), 231-239.
Gutierrez, K. (1994). How talk, context, and script shape contexts for learning: a cross- case comparison of journal sharing. Linguistics and Education, 5, 335-365.
Hall, J.K. (1995b). ‘Aw, man, where we goin?’: Classroom interaction and the development of L2 interactional competence. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6 (2), 37- 62.
Lin, A. (1999a). Resistance and creativity in English reading lessons in Hong Kong.Language, Culture and Curriculum, 12 (3), 285-296.
Lin, A. (1999b). Doing-English-Lessons in the reproduction or transformation of social worlds? TESOL Quarterly, 33 (3), 393-412.
Lin, A. (2000). Lively children trapped in an island of disadvantage: Verbal play of Cantonese working-class schoolboys in Hong Kong. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 143, 63-83.
Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, Ma: Harvard University Press.
Nassaji, H. & Wells, G. (2000). What’s the use of ‘traidicdialogue’?: An investigation of teacher-student interaction. Applied Linguistics, 21 (3), 376-406.
Nystrand, M, Gamoran, A., Kachur, R., &Pendergast, C. (1997).Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. New York: Teachers’ College Press.
Pérez-Tejera, F., Valera, S. y Anguera, M.T. (2011).Unnuevo instrumento para laidentificación de patrones de ocupación espacial. Psicothema, 23 (4), 858-863.
Roustan, M., Izquierdo, C. & Anguera, M.T. (2013, in press). Sequentialanalysisofaninteractivepeersupportgroup. Psicothema.
Sackett, G.P. (Ed.)(1978). Observing Behavior (Vol. 2): Data collection and analysis methods. Baltimore: University of Park Press.
Sackett, G.P. (1979). The lag sequential analysis of contingency and cyclicity on behavioral interac- tion research. In J.D. Osofsky (Ed.),Handbook of infant development (pp. 623-649). New York: Wi- ley.
Sackett, G. P. (1987). Analysis of sequential social interactiondata: Some issues, recent developments, and causal inference model. En J.Osofsky (eds.), Handbook of infant development.Wiley: Nueva York, 855-878.
Sinclair, J. &Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
Smagorinsky, P. & Fly. P. (1993). The social environment of the classroom: A Vygotskyan perspective on small group process. Communication Education, 42 (2), 159-71.
Wells, G. (1987).Aprendices en el dominio de la lenguaescrita. En A. Alvarez (Eds.). Psicología y Educación.Realizaciones y tendenciasactuales en la investigación y en la práctica.Aprendizaje Visor/Madrid.