Motivational Aspects of Using Computers for Writing among the Malaysian ESL Students
Past research have shown that students view activities using computers in language learning to be highly motivating (Krendl, 1988). A more recent study conducted by Warschauer (1996), especially focusing on ESL and EFL students’ writing in universities in Hong Kong, Taiwan and the US, has found encouraging results with regards to students’ motivational attitude towards using computers in writing. In the Malaysian context however, very few researches have been conducted to study the use of computers in language learning at the tertiary level, particularly in identifying factors that affect students’ motivation in learning writing using computers. A 42 question survey investigating the attitude of Malaysian students was administered and it was found that students were highly motivated and felt empowered to study language and writing via the computer.
Armour-Thomas, E., White, M. A., & Boehm, A. (1987, April). The motivational effects of types of computer feedback on children’s learning and retention of relational concepts. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
Chapelle, C., & Jamieson, J. (1986). Computer-assisted language learning as a predictor of success in acquiring English as a Second Language. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 27–46.
Chun, D. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22, 17–31.
Crookes, G., & Schmidt, R. W. (1991). Motivation: Reopening the Research Agenda. Language Learning, 41, 4, pp 469-512.
Daiute, C. (2000). Writing and Communication Technologies. In R. Indrisano, & J.R. Squire (Eds.), Perspectives on Writing (pp. 251-276). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Finocchiaro, M. (1982). Motivation: Its Crucial Role in Language Learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 223 3085).
Fox, M. (1988). A report on studies of motivation teaching and small group interaction with special reference to computers and to the teaching and learning of arithmetic. Milton Keynes, U.K.: The Open University, Institute of Educational Technology.
Hicken, S., Sullivan, H., & Klein, J. (1992). Learner control modes and incentive variations in computer delivered instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(4), 15–26.
Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and Motivation in Second-Language Learning. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House Publishers.
Gardner, R. C., & Tremblay, P.F. (1994). On Motivation, Research Agendas, and Theoretical Frameworks. Modern Language Journal, 78, 359-368. [EJ 497 731]
Kern, R. (1993, November). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. Paper presented at the meeting of American Council of Teachers of a Foreign Language, San Antonio, Texas.
Kinzie, M., Sullivan, H., & Berdel, R. (1988). Learner control and achievement in science computer assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 299–303.
Krendl, K.A (1988) Computers and learning: a review of recent research. Journal of Educational Computing research. Vol 4(4) 1998
Ngeow, Karen Yeok-Hwa. (1998). Motivation and Transfer in Language Learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 427 318).
Oxford, R., & Shearin, J. (1994). Language Learning Motivation: Expanding the Theoretical Framework. Modern Language Journal, 78, 12-28.
Perez, E. C., & White, M. A. (1985). Student evaluation of motivational and learning attributes of microcomputer software. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 12(2), 39–43.
Peterson, N., & Sellers, D. (1992, October). Student motivation and learning styles in a multimedia learning environment. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting Northern Rocky Mountain Educational Research Association, Custer, South Dakota.
Pollock, J., & Sullivan, H. (1990). Practice mode and learner control in computer-based instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 15, 251–260.
Relan, A. (1992, February). Motivational strategies in computer-based instruction: Some lessons from theories and models of motivation. In proceedings of selected research and development presentations at the Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 348 017)
Sullivan, N. (1993). Teaching writing on a computer network. TESOL Journal, 3(1), 34–35.
Waldrop, P. (1984). Behavior reinforcement strategies for computer-assisted instruction: Programming for success. Educational Technology, 24(4), 38–41.
Wang, Y. M. (1993). E-mail dialogue journaling in an ESL reading and writing classroom. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oregon at Eugene.
Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and writing. In C. Davison & J. Cummins (Eds.), Handbook of English Language Teaching. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Warschauer, Mark (1996). Motivational aspects of using computers for writing and communication. In Mark Warschauer (Ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning: Proceedings of the Hawai‘i symposium. (Technical Report #12) (pp. 29–46). Honolulu, Hawai‘i: University of Hawai‘i, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center. Retrieved [access date] from the World Wide Web: http://www.lll.hawaii.edu/nflrc/NetWorks/NW1/
Williams, M. (1993, January). A comprehensive review of learner-control: The role of learner characteristics. Paper presented at the Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology Sponsored by the Research and Theory Division, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 362 211)
Wu, Y.-C. (1992, November). Computerized teachers’ praise: Incorporating teachers’ images and voices. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Knoxville, TN. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 354 873)
How to Cite
Authors wishing to include figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.