How Functional Team Roles Mitigate the Effect of Conflict on Team Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.76.8574Keywords:
Work Teams, Team Roles, Conflict, Performance, Team DevelopmentAbstract
Work team structures are used in organizations to achieve higher performance, enable greater creativity, and create more political buy in. The literature suggests that when teams are able to coherently carry out certain functional team roles, conflict is better managed and higher performance is achieved. This study investigates these claims in a sample of 449 individuals working in 94 project teams over two project types. Findings indicate that the performance of task and social team roles was negatively related to task and relationship conflict for both work types. In addition, Spanning roles were negatively associated with conflict only for the more complex project. Finally, functional team roles were associated with team performance for both project types. The implications for researching and managing roles in work teams are discussed.
References
2. Burke, C.S., E. Georganta, and S. Marlow, A Bottom-Up Perspective to Understanding the Dynamics of Team Roles in Mission Critical Teams. Frontiers in psychology, 2019. 10: p. 1322.
3. Driskell, T., et al., Team roles: A review and integration. Small Group Research, 2017. 48(4): p. 482-511.
4. Fisher, S., T. Hunter, and W. Macrosson, The structure of Belbin's team roles. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 1998. 71(3): p. 283-288.
5. Belbin, R.M., Management teams: Why they succeed or fail. Human Resource Management International Digest, 2011.
6. Deeter-Schmelz, D.R., Applying teams to logistics processes: Information acquistion and the impact of team role clarity and norms. Journal of Business Logistics, 1997. 18(1): p. 159.
7. Bray, S.R. and L.R. Brawley, Role efficacy, role clarity, and role performance effectiveness. Small group research, 2002. 33(2): p. 233-253.
8. Mumford, T.V., et al., The Team Role Test: Development and validation of a team role knowledge situational judgment test. Journal of applied psychology, 2008. 93(2): p. 250.
9. Mumford, T.V., M.A. Campion, and F.P. Morgeson, Situational judgment in work teams: A team role typology. Situational judgment tests: Theory, measurement, and application, 2006: p. 319-343.
10. Benne, K.D. and P. Sheats, Functional roles of group members. Journal of social issues, 1948.
11. Mumford, T.V., Just Teams: The Relationship Between Team Roles, Fairness and Performance. Journal of the Academy of Business Education, 2010. 11.
12. MUMFORD, T.V. and M. MATTSON. WILL TEAMS WORK?: HOW THE NATURE OF WORK DRIVES SYNERGY IN AUTONOMOUS TEAM DESIGNS. in Academy of Management Proceedings. 2009. Academy of Management Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510.
13. Davison, R.B., et al., Coordinated action in multiteam systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2012. 97(4): p. 808.
14. Mathieu, J.E., M.A. Marks, and S.J. Zaccaro, Multiteam systems. 2002.
15. Ancona, D.G. and D. Caldwell, Beyond boundary spanning: Managing external dependence in product development teams. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 1990. 1(2): p. 119-135.
16. Bradley, B.H., et al., When conflict helps: Integrating evidence for beneficial conflict in groups and teams under three perspectives. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2015. 19(4): p. 243.
17. Bradley, B.H., et al., Reaping the benefits of task conflict in teams: The critical role of team psychological safety climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2012. 97(1): p. 151.
18. O'Neill, T.A., N.J. Allen, and S.E. Hastings, Examining the “pros” and “cons” of team con flict: A team-level meta-analysis of task, relationship, and process conflict. Human Performance, 2013. 26(3): p. 236-260.
19. De Dreu, C.K. and L.R. Weingart, Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. Journal of applied Psychology, 2003. 88(4): p. 741.
20. Jehn, K.A., A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative science quarterly, 1997: p. 530-557.
21. Jehn, K.A., Enhancing effectiveness: An investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value‐based intragroup conflict. International journal of conflict management, 1994.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors wishing to include figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
