Training of Geography Teachers for Secondary Schools at University in Uganda: An Analysis of Gulu University Teacher Trainees’ Teaching Practice.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.76.8194Keywords:
teaching methods; geography; teacher trainees; instructional materials.Abstract
The changes in learner characteristics and the learning environment in the twenty first century calls for adjustments in teacher training to meet the needs of the contemporary learners. This study analyses training of geography teachers at Gulu University with the view of assessing the application of contemporary geography teaching methodologies for the twenty first century learners. Time- series data were collected from teacher trainees’ lesson plans used during school practice running for three consecutive years of 2016, 2017, and 2018. Teaching methods as well as types of instructional materials were extracted from eighty one lessons taught by teacher trainees in thirty six schools in both rural and urban Uganda. Using SPSS 16.0 software, data was analysed to generate frequencies, counts and cross-tabulations. Findings reveal that question and answer method was the most used while guided discovery was the least used, followed by demonstration. Fieldwork and project methods were not used at all. It was also found out that in 12% of all the lessons, there was no use of instructional materials in the teaching/learning process. The study recommends that the curriculum structure of future geography teacher trainees be improved to factor in contemporary teaching styles which use modern teaching equipment relevant to the current generation of technology and learners, and the training of lecturers who mentor geography teacher trainees at universities be institutionalized.
References
[2]. Kagoda, A, M. Teaching of Geography in Uganda Secondary Schools: Reflections of Geography Teacher Trainees at the School of Education, Makerere University, Uganda. Advances in Social Sciences Research, 2016. 3(5): p. 25-38.
[3]. Ilic, T. Current methods of geography education of teachers in Serbia. 2013. Paper presentation at Belgrade conference on Education, Serbia.
[4].Santos, D. Six teaching techniques you should know, 2018, https://www.goconqr.com/en/examtime/blog/teaching-techniques/. Accessed on 6th May 2019.
[5]. Shabiralyani, G., Hasan, K, S., Hamad, N., and Iqbal, N. Impact of visual aids in enhancing the learning process case research: District Dera Ghazi Khan. Journal of Education and Practice, 2015. 6(19): p. 37-49.
[6]. Aikotirini, K. Geography teacher quality and effectiveness: Lower secondary school students’ points of view, 2010. http://www.herodot.net/conferences/ayvalik/papers/educ-06.pdf. Accessed on 13th May 2019.
[7]. Omoro, B., and Wakhungu, N, L. Determining methods used in teaching geography in secondary schools in Rongo district, Kenya. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 2014. 3 (1): p. 220-232.
[8]. Nieto, G. The teaching of geography in the 21st century: Social, technological and pedagogical issues, 2014. Paper presented at the International Congress on Education conference, Madrid, Spain.
[9]. Guzey, S. S., & Roehrig, G. H. Teaching science with technology: Case studies of science teachers’ development of technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 2009. 9(1): p. 25-45.
[10]. Ngaroga, J. Primary Teacher Education, 2008, East African Educational publishers: Nairobi, Kenya.
[11]. Khalid, A. and Azeem, M. Constructivist Vs Traditional: Effective Instructional Approach in Teacher Education. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2012. 2 (5): p. 170-177.
[12]. Guzman, M, D., Lindsay, D, O., and Novera, E, G, D. Difficulties Faced in Teaching Geography Lessons at Public Secondary Schools Division of Zambales, Philippines. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2017. 22 (9): p. 64-70.
[13]. Ministry of Education and Sports. Handbook on teacher/instructor/tutor education and training policies: Acts, policy guidelines and regulations, 2010, Kampala.
[14]. Coetzer, I, A. A survey and appraisal of outcomes-based education in South Africa with reference to progressive education in America. Educare, 2001. 30: p. 73-93.
[15]. Doering, A., Hughes, J., & Huffman, D. Preservice teachers: Are we thinking about technology? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 2003. 35: p. 342-361.
[16]. Hughes, J., Kerr, S., & Ooms, A. Content-focused technology inquiry groups: Cases of teacher learning and technology integration. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2005. 32: 367-379.
[17]. Sandholtz, J. H., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D. C. Teaching with technology: Creating student-centered classrooms, 1997. Teachers College Press: New York, USA.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors wishing to include figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
