PHOBIA AND ITS EFFECT ON THE ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT OF PHYSICS STUDENTS IN IMO STATE, NIGERIA

Authors

  • Chinyere Ihekwaba Department of Education Psychology, Alvan Ikoku Federal College of Education

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.72.7791

Abstract

This research studied phobia and its effect on the academic achievement of Senior Secondary School Students of Physics in Owerri Municipal Council Area of Imo State, Nigeria. A sample of 488 students (259 females and 229 males) were taken from four (4) different schools in Owerri Municipal (two co-educational and two non-educational). Data was collected using a Physics Phobia Scale (PPS) developed by the researchers and validated by experts in Measurement and Evaluation from which the phobia levels of the students were ascertained. The students’ third term results were also used as secondary data. Using the PPS score and the achievement score, the correlation coefficient, mean, and standard deviation were obtained and T-tests were run for analysis. It was found that a significant negative relationship exist between the students’ phobia score and their achievement score. Results also showed that the male students with high phobia performed better than the female students with high phobia and also that the female students had higher phobia than the males; though, the mean difference is however not significant. It is recommended that varying teaching methods and grouping students when teaching will help reduce the phobia level. 

References

1. American Psychiatric Association; (2013), Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th edition) Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing, pp. 190, 197-202.

2. Ancell. C; Guttersrud, E; Henriksen & Isnes, A; (2004). Physics: Frightful, But Fun: Pupils’ and Teachers’ View of Physics and Physics Teaching, Science Education, 88(5),683-706.

3. Anxiety; (2012). In Merriam – Webster Online Dictionary. Retrieved on 7th April, 2018 from http://www.meriam-webster.com/dictionary/anxiety.

4. Barmby, P & Defty, N; (2006). Secondary School Pupils’ Perception of Physics. Science Technological Education, 24, pp. 199-215.

5. Erinosho, S.Y; (2013). How Do Students Perceive the Difficulty of Physics in Secondary School? An Exploratory Study in Nigeria. International journal for Cross- Disciplinary Subjects in Education (IJCDSE), Special Volume 3 Issue 3, 2013.

6. Funda, O; William, R; Robinson, O & Mark, P; (2008). What Makes Physics Difficult? International Journal of Environment & Science Education, Vol.3, Issue 1.

7. Hamm, A.O; (2009). Specific Phobias. The Psychiatric Clinics of North America.
a. International Journal of Environment & Science Education, Vol. 3. Issue 30.

8. Nasir (2010). Report of significant difference in anxiety levels of males and female physics students which negatively influenced their performance as is also the case for this study with regards to phobia and achievement.

9. Ogunleye, B.O & Babajide V.T.F; (2011). Generative Instructional Strategy Enhances Senior Secondary School Students’ Achievements in Physics. European Journal of Educational Studies: Vol.3, Issue 3.

10. Oludipe (2009). In his work revealed that female students exhibited higher test anxiety than their male counterparts.

11. Ornek, F; Robinson, W.R & Hangan, M.P; (2008). What Makes Physics Difficult?

12. Osuala, R.C & Ihekwaba, C.N; (2014). An Introduction to Research Methods & Guide to Research Project Reports (2nd Edition). Peacewise Systems Owerri, Imo State.

13. Smith, K.H; (2000). The Self – Concept and Verbal Academic Achievement of Primary and Secondary Teachers. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Melbourne, Australia.

14. William, C; Stranisstreet, M; Spall, K; Boyes, E; & Davidson, D; (2003). Why Aren’t Secondary School Students Interested in Physics? Physics Education, 38(4), pp. 324- 329.

Downloads

Published

2020-02-23

How to Cite

Ihekwaba, C. (2020). PHOBIA AND ITS EFFECT ON THE ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT OF PHYSICS STUDENTS IN IMO STATE, NIGERIA. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 7(2), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.72.7791