Fiscal Thoughts and Their Evolution before the 19th Century Analysis and Comparison between Britain and Germany

Main Article Content

qing han


The tradition of English classical public finance thinks the government are out of the society and can intervene it. Base on former thought and the market failure theory, the mainstream public finance has a clear tendency to oppose the market and the government. This approach not only ignored the political functions of government but also cannot explain the PPP and NPM. The cameralism’s view of the government provided new ideas for explaining this issue. Through the analysis and comparison of the financial thoughts of Britain and Germany before the 19th century, this paper clarifies the evolutionary logic of British fiscal thought, compares the similarities and differences between the British and German financial thoughts. Besides this paper also discusses the roots of these two traditions view of the government. The fiscal theory of cameralism not only reflects the subjective initiative of the government but also conforms to the reality of our country. These traditions interdisciplinary research tendency should also be re-emphasized.

Article Details

How to Cite
han, qing. (2020). Fiscal Thoughts and Their Evolution before the 19th Century. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 7(1), 315-319.


[1]Jürgen G. Backhaus, Wagner R E , Jürgen G. Backhaus, et al. Continental Public Finance: Mapping and Recovering a Tradition[J]. Atencion Primaria, 2005, 21(1):58-60.
[2]Jürgen G. Backhaus, Wagner R E , Jürgen G. Backhaus, et al. From Continental Public Finance to Public Choice: Mapping Continuity[J]. History of Political Economy, 2005, 37(Suppl_1).
[3]Jürgen G. Backhaus, Wagner R E . Society, State, and Public Finance: Setting the Analytical Stage[M]// Handbook of Public Finance. Springer US, 2005.
[4] Musgrave R A. Chapter 1 A brief history of fiscal doctrine[J]. Handbook of Public Economics, 1985, 1:1-59.
[5]Ma Jun.Public Finance: The Separation and Mix Of Two Traditions [J]. Economic Theory and Business Management,2012(10):63-73.
[6]Li Junsheng. The bankruptcy of Anglo-Saxon fiscal theory and the reconstruction of scientific financial theory——Rethinking Contemporary "Mainstream" Fiscal Theory[J]. Economic Perspectives,2014(04):117-130.
[7]Zhang Jinwu. The Political View of Public Finance: Historical Retrospect and Realistic Reflection [J]. Public Finance Research,2015(09):75-85.
[8]Shi Cheng.The Principle of King 'Should Live on His Own' in Medieval England [J].World History,2003(01):66-73+128.
[9] Sakairi Chotaro.European and American financial thought history [M]. Chinese financial&Economic Publishing House,1987
[10]Backhaus J , Wagner R E . The cameralists: A public choice perspective[J]. Public Choice, 1987.
[11] Knemeyer F, Trib K. Polizei[J]. Economy & Society, 1980, 9(2):172-196.
[12] Tribe K . Cameralism and the Science of Government[J]. The Journal of Modern History, 1984, 56(2):263-284.