Practical reflectivity as a context for teachers´ professional development: a mixed-methods study
This study aims at analysing the influence of practical reflectivity, as a context for professional learning, and its impact on teaching practices. Therefore, a mixed research method has been selected, based on qualitative and quantitative procedures, combining an enquiry to high school teachers and interviews to supervisors, given their privileged knowledge on the educational reality of schools and especially on the performance of teachers in classroom. These two areas of analysis, in spite of being different in terms of methodological nature, enable a comparative analysis.
The study shows that all the participants, teachers and supervisors, recognize the importance of a contextualized reflection-in-action as the means to achieve greater quality of practices and an effectiveness of professional teaching development. It is also consensual the importance of a reflective teacher, who is able to question and improve his practice using investigation-in-action as basis. However, reflection is not always applied during the educational process, demanding more collaborative work between peers, pedagogical didactic update and investigation placing the student as centre. Although there is still a long way to go in terms of professional training, participants of this study perceive reflectivity as the right way to be a teacher in an educational community.
• Robson, J., Teacher Professionalism in Further and Higher Education: Challenges to Culture and Practice, 2006, London: Routledge.
• Hargreaves, A., and Shirley, D. , The fourth way. The inspiring future for educational change, 2009, California: Corwin.
• Schön ,D., The reflective practitioner, 1983, New York: Basic Books.
• D Schön ,D., Educating the reflective practitioner: toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions, 1987, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Schön ,D., The refletive turn. Case studies in and on educational practice, 1991, New York: Teachers Press, Columbia University.
• Argyris, C., and Schön, D. , Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective, 1978, Reading, Mass: Addison Wesley.
• Argyris, C., and Schön, D. , Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice, 1996, Reading, Mass: Addison Wesley.
• Alarcão, I. , Formação e Supervisão de Professores. Uma nova abrangência, Sísifo, Revista de Ciências da Educação, 2009. 8: p.119-128.From http://sisifo.fpce.ul.pt
• Moon, J., Reflection in Learning and Professional Development: theory and practice, 2004, Routledge: Oxon.
• Zeichner, K.M., and Liston, D. ,Teaching student teachers to reflect, Harvard Educational Review, 1986. 57, (1): p. 1-22.
• Zeichner, K.M., Action research: Personal renewal and social reconstruction, Educational Action Research, 1993. 1 (2): p.199-220.
• Dewey, J., How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process, 1933, Boston: D. C. Heath.
• Dewey, J., Experience and Education, 1938, New York: Macmillan.
• Rodgers, C., Defining reflection: another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking, Teachers College Record, 2002. 4 ( 4): p. 842-866.
• Perrrenoud, Ph., Savoir réfléchir sur sa pratique, objectif central de la formation des enseignants? 1998, Université de Genève: Faculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de l’Éducation.
• Perrrenoud, Ph., Dix nouvelles compétences pour enseigner: invitation au voyage, 1999, Paris: ESF.
• Pultorak , E., The Purposes, Practices, and Professionalism of Teacher Reflectivity: Insights for Twenty-first-century Teachers and Students, 2010, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
• Senge, P., et al. , Schools that learn. A fifth discipline field book for educators, parents, and everyone who cares about education, 2000, New York: Doubleday.
• Nolan J., and Hoover, L. ,Teacher Supervision and Evaluation. Theory into Practice, 2004, Hoboken : Wiley Jossey-Bass Education.
• Glickman, C., Gordon, S., and Ross-Gordon, J., Supervision and Instructional Leadership. A Developmental Approach , 6.th ed., 2001, Boston: Pearson, Allyn and Bacon.
• Pawlas, G., and Oliva, P., Supervision for Today´s Schools, 8.th ed., 2007, Indianapolis: Wiley & Jossey-Bass Éducation.
• York-Barr, J., et al., Reflective practice to improve schools: An action guide for educators , 2nd. ed.,2006, Thousand Oaks: CA, Corwin Press.
• Peel, D., Dual professionalism: facing the challenges of continuing professional professional development in the workplace? , Reflective Practice, 2005. 6 (1): p. 123 -140.
• Bronfenbrenner, U., The ecology of human development by nature and design, 1979, Cambridge, Harvard: University Press.
• Bronfenbrenner, U., Ecological models of human development, International Encyclopedia of Education , 3, 2nd. ed., 1994, Oxford: Elsevier.
• Bronfenbrenner, U., Making Human Being Human: Bio-ecological Perspectives on Human Development, 2005, London: Sage Publications.
• Ercikan, E. , and Roth, W.- M., What Good Is Polarizing Research Into Qualitative and Quantitative? Educational Research Journal, 2006. 35 (5): p.14-23.
• Punch, K., Research Methods in Education (reprinted),2011, London: Sage.
• Stake,R. , The Art of Sudy Case Research,1995, London: Sage.
• Yin, R. , Qualitative research from start to finish, 2011, New York: Guilford Press.
• Coimbra, M. N., and Martins, A.M., Case Studying Educational Research: A Way of Looking at Reality American Journal of Educational Research, 2013. 1( 9): p. 391-395.
• Harris, L., and Brown, G. ,Mixing interview & questionnaire methods, Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2010. 15 (1): p. 1-19.
• Reams, P., and Twale, D., The promise of mixed methods: Discovering conflicting realities in the data, International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 2008. 31(2): p. 133-142.
Authors wishing to include figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.