PERCEPTION OF ACCOUNTING ORGANISATIONS NEEDS AND THE ROLE OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS
As Community Based Research (CBR) gains currency as a ‘research strategy of choice’ for the community sector (and increasingly establishes itself as a credible research approach also in the academic sector) we believe there is a need to revisit what have become the conventions of CBR and consider how these are enacted in practice. We could verify that there are several Higher Education Institutions (HEI’s) with offices of support services to the community or with this type of goal in their research projects, a demand which is also demonstrated by the organisation that evaluates the HEI’s in Portugal. Mainly, the type of problems studied by the community support centres in universities, are related with health, disabilities, and social exclusion. The current investigation is innovative because it was performed in order to identify in what way the accounting organisations need the help of HEI’s to provide independent participatory research support in response to concerns experienced by these organisations.
Through a questionnaire composed of open and closed questions it was our intention to obtain information regarding the perspective of accounting professionals considering the needs and gaps that they feel in their professional practice and how the HEI’s can contribute to help bridge these gaps.
Balazs, C. L., Morello-Frosch, R., Hubbard, A. E., & Ray, I. (2012). Environmental justice implications of arsenic contamination in California’s San Joaquin Valley: a cross-sectional, cluster-design examining exposure and compliance in community drinking water systems. Environmental Health, 11(1), 84. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-11-84
Cook, W. K. (2008). Integrating research and action: a systematic review of community-based participatory research to address health disparities in environmental and occupational health in the USA. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 62(8), 668–676. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2007.067645
Fals Borda, O. (2006). Participatory (action) research in social theory: Origins and challenges. London: Sage Publications.
Freire, P. (1970). Cutural Action and Consciencializtion. Harvard Eductional Review, 40(3), 452–477.
Green, J., & Kleiner, A. (2010). Action Research and Evaluation in Community Development, Pp. 119–39 in Introduction to Community Development: Theory, Practice and Service-learning. Sage Publications, 119–139.
Green, L. W. (1995). Study of Participatory Research in Health Promotion: Review and Recommendations for the Development of Participatory Research in Health Promotion in Canada. British Columbia: Royal Society of Canada.
Hall H., R. (2004). Organizações: estruturas, processos e resultados (8th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Hill, M. M., & Hill, A. (2009). Investigação por Questionário (2a). Edições Sílabo.
Israel, B., Eng, E., Schulz, A., & Parker, E. (1998). Methods in Community-Based Participatory Research for Health. Jossey-Bass.
Jordan, S. (2003). Who Stole My Methodology? Co-opting PAR. Globalisation, Societies, and Education, 1(2), 185–200.
Jull, J., Giles, A., & Graham, I. D. (2017). Community-based participatory research and integrated knowledge translation: advancing the co-creation of knowledge. Implementation Science, 12(1), 150. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0696-3
Kleiner, A., Kerstetter, K., & Green, J. (2012). Community-Based Research: Analysis of Outcomes for Learning and Social Change. Journal of Rural Social Sciences, 27(2), 1.
Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts. New York: Harper and Brothers.
Macaulay, A. C., & Nutting, P. A. (2006). Moving the Frontiers Forward: Incorporating Community-Based Participatory Research Into Practice-Based Research Networks. Annals of Family Medicine, 4(1), 3.
Minkler, M., & Weinster, N. (2008). Introduction to Community-based Participatory Research: New Issues and Emphases. Jossey-Bass, 5–23.
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2006). Handbook of Action Research. London: Sage Publications.
Reis, B. (2017). Os conteúdos em análise-teorias e práticas da análise de conteúdo A transformação da análise de conteúdo no decurso dos tempos, 205–235.
Roche, B., Flicker, S., & Guta, A. (2008). Exploring the Use of Peer Research in CBR. Paper presented at the CUExpo, Victoria, BC.
Salmon, A. (2007). Walking the Talk: How Participatory Interview Methods Can Democratize Research. Qualitative Health Research, 17(7), 982–993. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307305250
Souza, F. N., Costa, A. P., & Moreira, A. (2016). webQDA - Qualitative Data Analysis (versão 3.0). Micro IO e Universidade de Aveiro.
Stoecker, R. R. (2005). Research Methods for Community Change: A Project-Based Approach. SAGE Publications.
Strand, K., Marullo, S., Cutforth, N., Stoecker, R., & Donohue, P. (2003). Principles of Best Practice for Community-Based Research. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 9(3), 5–15.
Thayer-Hart, N., Dykema, J., Elver, K., & Schaeffer, N. (2010). Survey fundamentals: A guide to designing and implementing surveys. University of Wisconsin.
Wood, L. (2017). The Ethical Implications of Community-Based Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 160940691774827. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917748276
Copyright (c) 2019 Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors wishing to include figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.