Advocacy for Monitoring and Evaluation in Community Development Projects in Africa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.18.708Keywords:
monitoring, evaluation, community, development, project, AfricaAbstract
Much of retrospection and reassessment of past undertakings and activities is necessary so to gain confidence in future tasks and ensure success. Review is mandatory and important in development projects. Many projects and programs suffer losses because of lack of or inefficient and ineffective monitoring and evaluation. Monitoring and evaluation helps in identifying the problem before hand or in time, hence, taking precautionary and even corrective measures in time. To win the favour of the donors and creditors, the evidence that the projects and programmes initiated are succeeding is inevitable. The type of evaluation depends on the object being evaluated and the purpose of the evaluation. Monitoring and evaluation should be incorporated in the planning of a project or programme. The monitoring and evaluation process may be presented in several phases. Methodology adopted was review of literature and the conclusions were made based on arguments elicited in the paper.
Key Words: monitoring; evaluation; community; development; project; Africa
References
Wholey J.S., Hatry H.P., & Newcomer K.E (Eds.),Handbook of Practical Programme Evaluation 3rd Ed (pp 456). Retrieved from www.josseybass.com/wileyCDA
Nuguti E.O. (2009). Understanding Project Monitoring and Evaluation. Nairobi: EKON Publishers.
Ongula P.A. (2002) Monitoring and evaluation of educational projects and programme. Nairobi: New Kemit Publishers.
Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Rossi, P.H, Freeman, M.W. & Lipsey, H.E. (2004). Evaluation: A System Approach. Thousand
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors wishing to include figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.