Can we use case method for all pre-service teachers?

The influence of pre-service teacher’s characteristics on case learning

Authors

  • Wei-Yu Liu National Dong Hwa University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.68.6900

Keywords:

case method, pre-service teacher, case learning, learning styles

Abstract

This study is to explore the influence of student characteristics on case learning. How do the influence of gender, experience, major and learning style on pre-service teachers’ case learning? There are thirty-seven preservice teachers in the Elementary Education Program of Center for Teacher Education at National Dong-Hwa University in Taiwan participated in this study. The results show that there is difference between pre case discussion decision making and post case discussion decision making and decision making perspectives. There is no difference in the influence of pre-service teachers’ gender, teaching experience, and learning styles on case learning. That is, case method is effective for all preservice teachers, no matter what characteristics are they. However, all learning styles except for assimilating learning style have more pre-service teachers changed than no changed. Does it indicate that assimilating learning style pre-service teachers might have difficulty to learn from case method because they in favor of abstract concepts instead of real case? More researches are needed for understanding the influence of pre-service teachers’ learning style on case learning. 

References

Andersson, K., Hussenius, A. & Gustafsson, C. (2009). Gender theory as a tool for analyzing science teaching. Teaching and teacher education, 25, 336-343.
Bullough,J. R. (1997). Becoming a teacher: self and the social location of teacher education. In B. J. Biddleetal (eds.). International handbook of teachers and teaching, pp. 79-134. Netherlands: Kluwer academic publishers.
Boling, E. C. (2007). Linking technology, learning, and stories: implications from research on hypermedia video-cases. Teaching and teacher education 23, 189-200.
Diaz, D. P., & Cartnal, R. B. (1999). Students' learning styles in two classes: Online distance learning and equivalent on-campus. College Teaching, 47(4), 130-135.
Gardner, H.(1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.
Grasha, A. F. (1996). Teaching with style- a practical guide to enhancing learning by understanding teaching and learning styles. CA: Alliance Publishers.
Harrington, H. L. (1995). Fostering reasoned decisions: case-based pedagogy and the professional development of teachers. Teaching & Teacher Education, 11(3), 203-214.
Hruska-Riechmann, S., & Grasha, A.F. (1982). The Grasha-Riechmann Student Learning Style Scales: Research findings and applications. In J. Keefe (Ed.), Student learning styles and brain behavior. VA: NASSP.
James and Gardner (1995).
Kleinfeld (1991). Changes in problem solving abilities of students taught through case methods. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Lazear, (1999).
Levin, B. B. (1993). Using the case method in teacher education: the role of discussion and experience in teachers’ thinking about cases. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Liu, W. Y., & Teele S. (2009). A study on the intelligence profiles of Taiwan indigenous pupils—the case of second grade pupils. Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 38, 83-93
Lundeberg, M. A. & Fawver, J. E. (1993). Cognitive growth in case analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta.
Merseth, K. K. (1996). Cases and case methods in teacher education. In T. J. Buttery, E. Guyton, & J.P, Sikula (eds.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education, 2nd Ed. (p,722-744). NY: MacMillan Publishers.
Merseth (1991). The early history of case-based instruction: insights for teacher education today.
Richardson, V. & Kile, S. (1992). The use of video cases in teacher education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
Sykes, G. & Bird, T. (1992). Teacher education and the case idea. In G. Grant (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 18, pp. 457-521). Washington, D. C.: American Educational Research Association.
Welty, W. M., Silverman, R., & Lyon S. (1991). Student outcomes from teaching with cases. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educationl Research Association, Chicago.

Downloads

Published

2019-08-19

How to Cite

Liu, W.-Y. (2019). Can we use case method for all pre-service teachers? : The influence of pre-service teacher’s characteristics on case learning. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 6(8), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.68.6900