Farmers’ Perception on Acceptability of Improved Sugarcane Varieties in Kakamega County, Kenya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.67.6766Keywords:
Sugarcane, Attributes, Acceptance, Compatibility, Improved varietiesAbstract
Improved sugarcane varieties have been developed and promoted in Kenya, with an aim of enhancing sugarcane productivity. However, their acceptance by farmers is low. This paper examines farmers’ perception on these varieties as a basis for explaining their acceptability by farmers and attempts to underpin determinants that inhibit or facilitate their acceptance. This study was conducted using a cross-sectional survey research design. Target population was 137,355 small-scale sugarcane farmers from Kakamega County, from which a sample of 384 farmers was randomly selected. Questionnaires were used to collect data, which was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The research findings confirmed that majority of farmers produced old commercial sugarcane varieties. Respondent farmers prioritized high tonnage, early maturity, pest resistance, ratoonability, high tillering and disease resistance as the top preferred attributes of sugarcane varieties. Based on the farmers’ perception, an association between farmers preferred sugarcane attributes and acceptability of the improved sugarcane varieties was established. Improved sugarcane varieties that portrayed compatible attributes with farmers’ preferred traditional varieties were found to be highly acceptable for production by farmers. Compatibility of improved sugarcane technologies with the farmers’ perceived needs, preferences and values therefore need to be considered in the development of improved sugarcane technologies to enhance their appropriateness and acceptance by farmers. Findings from this study would avail critical information in sugarcane research and development which may serve as a guide to technology developers to ensure technologies produced meet preferences of the targeted user for enhanced technology acceptance.
References
diffusion. The Built & Human Environment Review.
abukhzam@pgr.salford.ac.uk and a.lee@salford.ac.uk
2. Abura, G.O., Gikunda, R.M., & Nato, N.G. (2013). Technical knowledge and
information gaps among smallholder farmers in the production of sugarcane in Kakamega County, Kenya. IJASRT in EESs, 3(4), 199-207.
3. Adesina A.A & Baidu-Forson J. (1995). Farmers' perceptions and adoption of new
agricultural technology: Evidence from analysis in Burkina Faso and Guinea,
West Africa. Agricultural Economics 13, 1-9. SSDI 0169-5150(95)01142
4. Agriculture, Fisheries and Food Authority (AFFA, 2016). Sugar Directorate.
5. Agrocharts, (2014). Kenya sugar annual. www.agrochart.com
6. Aldosari F., Kassem H.S., Khodran H., Al-Zahrani, Al-Zaidi A., Baig M.B., (2017). Factors
Influencing Attitudes of Female Students towards Farming: A Case Study. Agriculture and Forestry Journal: 1 pp. 68-72. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1133250
7. Barua, P. (2016). Factors Affecting Technology Adoption among Smallholder Maize
Farmers in Tanzania. Research Gate. Sustainable International Development.
https://www.researchgate.net
8. Conroy, C., & Sutherland A. (2014). Participatory technology development with
resource poor farmers: Maximising impact through the use of recommendations domains. Agricultural Research & Extension Network. Network paper No.133. UK
9. Food and Agriculture Organization (2019). FAO Land & Water. Sugarcane
www.fao.org/Land&water/sugarcane.html.
10. Food and Agriculture Organization, (2010). Crop production.
methodology for PLEC-Tanzania. PLEC Tanzania Progress Reports.
11. Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization, (2019). Kenya Agricultural
and Livestock Research Organization. Sugar Research Institute. E-Repository.
www.kalro.org/sugar
12. Kenya Sugar Board. (2014). Cane Census 2013/14- 14/15 Report.
13. Kenya Sugar Research Foundation, (2014, June). Newly released varieties, KESREF
digest 7 (4).
14. Kenya Sugar Research Foundation. (2012). Kenya Sugar Research Foundation. A
framework for the production, certification and distribution of seed cane in the
Kenya sugar industry. Kisumu, Kenya.
15. Kshirsagar K.G., Pandey S., and Bellon M.R., (2002). Farmer Perceptions, Varietal
Characteristics and Technology Adoption: A Rainfed Rice Village in Orissa. Economic and Political Weekly, 37(13), pp. 1239-1246. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4411927
16. Lihasi, L.K., Onyango C. & Ochola W., (2016). Analysis of Smallholder Sugarcane
Farmers’ Livelihood Assets in Relation to Food Security in Mumias Sub-County
Kenya. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development.Vol.7, No.20
www.iiste.org
17. Mnisi, M.S., & Dlamini C. S. (2012). The concept of sustainable sugarcane
production: Global, African and South African perceptions. African Journal of
Agricultural Research, 7 (31), 4337-4343. http://www.academicjournals.org
18. Murphy R. (2017). Sugarcane: Production Systems, Uses and Economic Importance.
Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
19. Mwanga D., Ong’ala J., Orwa G.(2017). Modeling Sugarcane Yields in the Kenya
Sugar Industry: A SARIMA Model Forecasting Approach. International
Journal of Statistics and Applications, 7(6): 280-288.
DOI: 10.5923/j.statistics.20170706.02
20. Sa’ari J.R., Jabar J., Tahir M.H., Mahpoth M.H., (2017).Farmer’s acceptance towards
sustainable farming technology. Science-Gate International Journal of Advanced
and Applied Sciences. 4(12) 2017. Pp: 220-225, Malaysia. http://www.science-gate.com/IJAAS.html
21. Smith, E. S., & Ulu C., 2012. Technology Adoption with Uncertain Future Costs and
Quality. Operation research, 60 (2), 262-274.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.1110.1035
22. Tena E., Mekbib F., Shimelis H., & Mwadzingeni L., (2016). Sugarcane production
under smallholder farming systems: Farmers preferred traits, constraints and genetic resources. Journal Cogent Food & Agriculture . 2(1) .https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2016.1191323
23. The Research Advisors, (2006). http://research-advisors.com/
24. Toledano B.I. (2017). Farmers’ preferences and the factors affecting their decision to
improve maize crops in Mexico. Institutional repository Upcommons. Institute
of sustainability. Universitat politècnica de Catalunya. Spain
http://upcommons.upc.edu/tesis
25. Wale E. and Yalew A. (2007). Farmers' Variety Attribute Preferences: Implications for
Breeding Priority Setting and Agricultural Extension Policy in Ethiopia. African
Development Review Volume19, Issue 2 Pages 379-396
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8268.2007.00167.x
26. Zhao, D. & Li Y. (2015). Climate change and sugarcane production: Potential impact
and mitigation strategies. International Journal of Agronomy,10.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/547386
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors wishing to include figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
