Delisting of firms in Malaysia; what the financial conditions and auditor reports reveal?

  • Ali Raza Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia.
  • Wan Nordin Wan Hussin Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia.
  • Jamaliah Abdul Majid School of Accountancy, College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia.
Keywords: Delisting, Going Concern opinion, Capital Market, Bursa Malaysia

Abstract

The study examines the financial conditions and auditor’s reports in relevance with the delisting of firms from the Malaysian stock market. The dataset comprised of the period of 5 years from 2012 to 2016 and finds out that total 69 companies were delisted from the exchange. By using the descriptive and univariate analysis techniques we find out that poor financial condition is a major reason of delisting of firms in Malaysia. The mean difference between unclean and clean audit opinion groups demonstrate that auditor’s role to evaluate the going concern assumption is also very important as more then 1/3 of the firms received unclean audit opinion due to going concern uncertainty. The unclean group delisted firms on average showed high losses, high negative ROA, high leverage and low total assets as compared to clean group. The study is useful for investors and other stakeholders to make their investing decisions efficiently.

References

Bharath, S.T. and Dittmar, A.K. (2010) Why do firms use private equity to opt out of public

markets? Review of Financial Studies 23: 1771–1818.

Doidge, C., Karolyi, A. and Stulz, R.M. (2015) The US listing gap. Working Paper,

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2605000. (accessed on June 13, 2016).

EU Council (2004) Directive 2004/39/EC on markets in financial instruments amending.

Official Journal of the European Union: L 145/1.

Gao, X., Ritter, J.R and Zhongyan, Z. (2013) Where have all the IPOs gone? Journal of

Financial and Quantitative Analysis 48(6): 1663—1692.

Grullon, G., Larkin, Y. and Michaely, R. (2015) The disappearance of public firms and the

changing nature of U.S. Industries. Working Paper, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2612047. (accessed on June 13, 2016).

Kashefi Pour, E. and Lasfer, M. (2013) Why do companies delist voluntarily from the stock

market? Journal of Banking and Finance 37: 4850–4860.

Kennon, J. (2018) What happens when a stock you own is delisted? Retrieved from https://

www.thebalance.com/what-does-it-mean-when-a-stock-is-delisted-357804

Kenton, W. (2018) What is delisting. Retrieved from https://www. investopedia.com /terms/d/

delisting.asp

Kim, W. and Weisbach, M.S. (2008) Motivations for public equity offers: an international

perspective. Journal of Financial Economics 87: 281–307.

Leuz, C., Triantis, A. and Wang, T.Y. (2008) Why do firms go dark? Causes and economic

consequences of voluntary SEC deregistrations. Journal of Accounting & Economics 45: 181–208.

Macey, J., O’Hara, M., & Pompilio, D. (2008). Down and out in the stock market: the law and

economics of the delisting process. The Journal of Law and Economics, 51(4), 683-713.

Martinez, I. and Serve, S. (2011) The delisting decision: the case of buyout offer with squeeze-

out (BOSO). International Review of Law and Economics 31(4): 229–239.

Martinez, I., & Serve, S. (2017). Reasons for delisting and consequences: A literature review and

research agenda. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(3), 733-770.

MIA (2015) International standards on auditing 705 (revised). Copyright © January 2015 by the

International Federation of Accountants (IFAC).

Thomsen, S. and Vinten, F. (2014) Delistings and the costs of governance: a study of European

stock exchanges 1996–2004. Journal of Management and Governance 18: 793–833.

Weir, C., Wright,M. and Scholes, L. (2008) Public-to-private buy-outs, distress costs and private

equity. Applied Financial Economics 18: 801–819.

Published
2019-05-19