The Effects of TGfU, SEM and HTGfU-SEM Towards Volleyball and Badminton Cognitive Game Play on Performance Among Form One Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.63.6299Keywords:
Teaching Games for Understanding, Sport Education Model, Hybrid TGfU – SEM (HTGfU-SEM), cognitive domain, decision makingAbstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of Teaching games for Understanding (TGfU) as a control group compared to Sport Education Mode (SEM)l and Hybrid TGfU and Sport Education Model (HTGfU – SEM) as treatment groups in volleyball 3 vs 3 and badminton doubles game play. The effectiveness of these models were assessed based on cognitive tactical decision making of opening and closing space, selection of skill off digging, setting, blocking and spiking 3 vs 3 volleyball game play. As well as in opening and closing space and selection skills of forehand, lob shot and smash in badminton doubles game play. The research employed Quasi Experimental pre-post test design. A total of 96 students aged 13 years old were chosen intactly and distributed equally into three groups with 16 girls and 16 boys. The study utilized adopted Game Performance Assessment Instrument (GPAI) to access cognitive aspects of decision making. The data were analyzed using Mean, SD, ANOVA, ANCOVA, MANOVA and post-hoc test. As for the overall tactical decision making via multivariate test in volleyball and badminton double game play indicated significant through SEM. Especially for closing space in volleyball 3 vs 3 game play through SEM, F (2, 93) = 10.054, p < 0.05, η2 = .178. As well as significant improvement with SEM in opening space badminton double game play, with F (2, 93) = 3.148, p < 0.05, η2 = 0.63. Furthermore pairwise comparison indicated improvement through SEM for closing space with SEM, p = 2.031, p < 0.05. Therefore SEM is recommended as game play model for future learning cognitive aspects of tactical decision making in volleyball and badminton.References
. Nathan, S. (2016). Badminton instructional in Malaysian schools: a comparative analysis of TGfU and SDT pedagogical models. SpringerPlus, 5(1). http://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2872-3.
. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015). Pendidikan Jasmani dan Pendidikan Kesihatan (Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran) Tingkatan 1. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
. Nathan, S. (2014). Instruksi Model Taktikal Permainan. PTS Akademia, Malaysia.
. Mandigo, J. L., & Holt, N. L. (2004). Reading the game: Introducing the notion of gammes literacy. Physical and Health Educational Journal, 70(3), 4–10.
. Bunker, D., & Thorpe, R. (1982). A model for the teaching of games in secondary schools. Bulletin of Physical Education, 18.
. Griffin, L. L., Brooker, R., & Patton, K. (2005). Working towards legitimacy: two decades of teaching games for understanding. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 10(3), 213–223. http://doi.org/10.1080/17408980500340703.
. Siedentop, D. (1994). Sport Education: Quality PE Through Positive Sports Experiences. Human Kinetics Publishers.
. Metzler, M. (2011). Instructional Model for Physical Education (3rd ed.). Scottsdale,AZ: Holcomb Hathaway.
. Harvey, S., & Jarrett, K. (2014). A review of the game-centred approaches to teaching and coaching literature since 2006. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 19(3), 278–300. http://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2012.754005.
. Werner, P., Thorpe, R., & Bunker, D. (1996). Teaching Games for Understanding: Evolution of a Model. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 67(1), 28–33. http://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.1996.10607176.
. López, I., Práxedes, A., & Villar, F. del. (2016). Effect of an intervention teaching program, based on TGfU model, on the cognitive and execution variables, in the Physical Education context. European Journal of Human Movement, 37(0), 88–108.
. Hastie, P. (1998). Applied Benefits of the Sport Education Model. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 69(4), 24–26. http://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.1998.10605530.
. Wallhead, T. L., Garn, A. C., & Vidoni, C. (2014). Effect of a sport education program on motivation for physical education and leisure-time physical activity. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. Taylor & Francis. http://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2014.961051.
. Mesquita, I., Farias, C., & Hastie, P. (2012). The impact of a hybrid Sport Education-Invasion Games Competence Model soccer unit on students’ decision making, skill execution and overall game performance. European Physical Education Review, 18(2), 205–219. http://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X12440027.
. Hastie, P. A., & Curtner-Smith, M. D. (2006). Influence of a hybrid Sport Education—Teaching Games for Understanding unit on one teacher and his students. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 11(1), 1–27. http://doi.org/10.1080/17408980500466813
. Kirk, D. (2013). Educational Value and Models-Based Practice in Physical Education Educational Value and Models-Based Practice in Physical Education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 45(9), 873–986. http://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2013.785352.
. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015). Pendidikan Jasmani dan Pendidikan Kesihatan (Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran) Tingkatan 1. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
. Malathi, B., Shabeshan, R., & Mohd Salleh, A. (2011). Effect of Teaching Games for Understanding Approach on Students’ Cognitve Learning Outcome. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 163–166.
. Harvey, S., Cushion, C. J., Wegis, H. M., & Massa-Gonzalez, A. N. (2010). Teaching Games for Understanding In American High-School Soccer: A Quantitative Data Analysis Using The Game Performance Assessment Instrument. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 15(1), 29–54. http://doi.org/10.1080/17408980902729354.
. Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective (6th ed.). Pearson.
. Mahedero, P., Calderón, A., Arias-Estero, J. L., Hastie, P. A., & Guarino, A. J. (2015). Effects of Student Skill Level on Knowledge, Decision Making, Skill Execution and Game Performance in a Mini-Volleyball Sport Education Season. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 34(4), 626–641. http://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2014-0061.
. Hastie, P. A., Sinelnikov, O. A., & Guarino, A. J. (2009). The development of skill and tactical competencies during a season of badminton. European Journal of Sport Science, 9(3), 133–140. http://doi.org/10.1080/17461390802542564.
. del Villar Álvarez, F., & Práxedes Pizarro, A. (2017). The effects of a comprehensive teaching program on dribbling and passing decision-making and execution skills of young footballers. Kinesiology, 49(1), 74–83. http://doi.org/10.26582/k.49.1.6.
. López, I., Práxedes, A., & Villar, F. del. (2016). Effect of an intervention teaching program, based on TGfU model, on the cognitive and execution variables, in the Physical Education context. European Journal of Human Movement, 37(0), 88–108.
. Clemente, F., Filipe Rocha, R., & Korgaokar, A. (2012). Teaching physical education: the usefulness of the teaching games for understanding and the constraints-led approach. Journal of Physical Education and Sport ® (JPES), 12(4), 417–426. http://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2012.04062.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors wishing to include figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
