A Mixed Method Analysis of Mental Toughness in Elite and Sub-elite Male and Female Tennis Players in Pakistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.16.555Keywords:
Mixed Method Approach, Mental toughness, seasoned players, Elite Players, Sub-elite playersAbstract
The study examines the potential relationship between mental toughness and performance among elite and sub-elite tennis players in Karachi. 118 participants (3 male seasoned performers, 42 Elite male, 32 sub-elite male, 16 elite female, and 25 sub-elite females) were selected through purposive sampling. The mean age of the seasoned performers was 34 years, elite players’ 22.98 years (SD 7.55) and of sub-elite players was 22.42 years (SD 2.50). Qualitative data was collected by adapting the scale “Athletes “how tough are you”, Enders, Pamela Lynn (2007) in three sessions: i) individual semi- structured interviews of the 3 seasoned performers and ii) a focus group comprised of 8 elite and7 sub-elite players, and iii) an unstructured interview with the senior vice-President of Sindh Tennis Association. Psychological Performance Inventory- Alternative (Golby et al., 2007) was employed as a quantitative measure of mental toughness of 115 participants. Findings for qualitative data revealed that 3 seasoned performers considered ability to deal with pressure, ability to deal with pressure, focus, visualization, Confidence, ability to deal with negative talk, motivation and consistency to be crucial factors for tennis. Elite players regarded focus, and “fear of losing” to be critical aspects in comparison to sub-elite players who attributed motivation and routine practice to be crucial factors for tennis. Interview with the vice-president considered focus and monetary rewards to be decisive factors pertaining to the success of tennis players. Quantitative analysis was comprised of Cornbach Alpha reliability that was measured =.852 for 14 items (PPI-A, 2007). Findings of Independent sample t tests demonstrated that there was a significant difference between elite and sub-elite players on the measures of MT t =7.864, p=<.000, df =113. Independent sample t test was indicated t =6.622p=<.000, df =113 for gender differences in relation to MT. Stepwise multiple regression analyses on the components of mental toughness also indicated a significant difference among elite and non-elite tennis players Self-Belief, and Determination (B-=.086, t= 4.701, p<.000) and (B=.066, t=3.162, p<.000) respectively. On the basis of these results it can be deduced that properties of MT can be linked to predicting success in tennis.References
ATP Rankings Defining Excellence since 1973. Retrived on July 24, 2014 from
http://www.atpworldtour.com/Rankings/Singles.aspx?d=23.06.2014&r=1&c=# 07072014
Bull S.J, Sham brook C.J, James W, Brooks J. (2005). Towards an understanding of mental toughness in elite cricketers. J Applied Sport Psychology.
Connaughton, D., Hanton, S., & Jones, G. (2010). The development and maintenance of mental toughness in the world’s best performers. The Sport Psychologist, 24, 168-193.
Crust, L. (2008). A review and conceptual re-examination of mental toughness: Implications for future researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 576-583.
Dale, G. A. (1996). Existential phenomenology: Emphasizing the experience of the athlete in sport psychology research. The Sport Psychologist, 10, 307-321.
Enders, Pamela Lynn, (2007). “Athletes “how tough are you”. Retrieved on July 7, 2014 from
http://www.winnerscirclecoaching.com/resources/signUp.aspx?i=%2fresources%2fquestionnaires.aspx
Friend at Court The USTA HANDBOOK of Tennis Rules and Regulations (2012).
Golby, J., Sheard, M., & Van Wersch, A. (2007). Evaluating the factor structure of the psychological performance inventory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 105, 309-325.
Golby, J., & Sheard, M. (2004). Mental toughness and hardiness at different levels of rugby league. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 933-942.
Gucciardi, D., & Gordon, S., (2011). Mental Toughness in Sports: Development in Theory and Research. Retrieved on July 26, 2014 from
History of Tennis- Origin of tennis game. Retrived on July 24, 2014 from http://www.tennistheme.com/tennishistory.html
Holloway, I. (1997). Basic concepts for qualitative research. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
Jeff Cooper. (2014). An Evolutionary History of Tennis Racquets. Retrived on September 24, 2014 from
http://tennis.about.com/od/racquetsballsstringing/a/evolmodracquet_3.htm
Jones, G., Hanton, S., & Connaughton, D. (2007). A framework of mental toughness in the world’s best performers. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, Vol. 21, 243-264.
Loehr, J. E. (1986). Mental toughness training for sports: achieving athletic excellence. Lexington, MA: Stephen Greene Press.
Mencinger T. (2014). Tennis Strategy Encyclopedia. Retrieved on September 28, 2014 from http://www.tennismindgame.com/support-files/tse.pdf
Middleton. S. C., Marsh, H. W., Martin, A. J., Richards, G. E., Savis, J., & Perry. C. (2004). Discovering mental toughness: A qualitative study of mental toughness in elite athletes. Retrieved on July 23, 2014 from
www.sectiononewrestling.com/discovering_toughness.pdf
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Sheard, M. (2010). Mental Toughness: The mindset behind sporting achievement. Hove, East Sussex. Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors wishing to include figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
