EFFECT OF SERVICE QUALITY ON STUDENTS’ INTENTION TO PROVIDE FUNDING SUPPORT TO PRIVATE UNIVERSITIES IN GHANA: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF STUDENTS’ SATISFACTION

Authors

  • jerry jay kraa Christian Service University College, School of Business P. O. BOX KS 3110, Kumasi, Ghana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.55.4544

Keywords:

HEdPERF Scale, Service Quality, Intention to Provide Funding Support, Satisfaction

Abstract

Abstract

The study investigates the effect of service quality on students’ intention to provide funding support to private universities in Ghana, the mediating role of students’ satisfaction. 600 students were selected from 6 private universities of which 421 responses were useable representing 70.16% response rate. Purposive and convenience sampling techniques were adopted in selecting respondents. Questionnaire was used for data collection. Stata version 13 and IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 20 were the software used in data analysis. The study made use of Structural Equation Model for data analysis. Confirmatory Factor Analysis was also used for data purification in achieving fit indices. The research found that HEdPERF positively and significantly affects students’ satisfaction and their intention to provide funding support to Private University. Students satisfaction also positively and significantly impact on student’s intention to provide funding support to Private University. As regards the mediation effect, customer satisfaction partially mediates the relationship between HEdPERF and intention to provide funding support to Private Universities. Managers and policy makers must take action to improve students’ intention to provide funding support to Universities by promoting Reputation and Access issues in tertiary education.

Author Biography

jerry jay kraa, Christian Service University College, School of Business P. O. BOX KS 3110, Kumasi, Ghana

Lecturer,  School of Business

References

Keller KL, Parameswaran M, Jacob I. Strategic brand management: Building, measuring, and managing brand equity: Pearson Education India; 2011.

Tsiotsou R. The role of perceived product quality and overall satisfaction on purchase intentions. International journal of consumer studies. 2006;30(2):207-17.

Brown RM, Mazzarol TW. The importance of institutional image to student satisfaction and loyalty within higher education. Higher Education. 2009;58(1):81-95.

Zemsky R, Wegner GR, Massy WF. Remaking the American university: Market-smart and mission-centered: Rutgers University Press; 2005.

Paswan AK, Ganesh G. Higher education institutions: Satisfaction and loyalty among international students. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education. 2009;19(1):65-84.

Chi HK, Yeh HR, Huang MW. The Influences of advertising endorser, brand image, brand equity, price promotion on purchase intention: The mediating effect of advertising endorser. The Journal of Global Business Management. 2009;5(1):224-33.

Tsiotsou R. Perceived quality levels and their relation to involvement, satisfaction, and purchase intentions. Marketing Bulletin. 2005;16(4):1-10.

Jalilvand MR, Samiei N, Mahdavinia SH. The effect of brand equity components on purchase intention: An application of Aaker’s model in the automobile industry. International business and management. 2011;2(2):149-58.

Chua C, editor Perception of quality in higher education. Proceedings of the Australian universities quality forum; 2004: Australian University Quality Agency Melbourne.

Stodnick M, Rogers P. Using SERVQUAL to measure the quality of the classroom experience. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education. 2008;6(1):115-33.

Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology. 1986;51(6):1173.

Oldfield BM, Baron S. Student perceptions of service quality in a UK university business and management faculty. Quality Assurance in education. 2000;8(2):85-95.

Jain R, Sinha G, Sahney S. Conceptualizing service quality in higher education. Asian Journal on Quality. 2011;12(3):296-314.

Oliver RL. A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of marketing research. 1980:460-9.

Abdullah F. HEdPERF versus SERVPERF: The quest for ideal measuring instrument of service quality in higher education sector. Quality Assurance in education. 2005;13(4):305-28.

Li RY, Kaye M. A case study for comparing two service quality measurement approaches in the context of teaching in higher education. Quality in Higher Education. 1998;4(2):103-13.

Sultan P, Yin Wong H. Service quality in higher education–a review and research agenda. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences. 2010;2(2):259-72.

Croom S. Introduction to research methodology in operations management. Researching operations management: Routledge; 2010. p. 56-97.

Parasuraman A, Zeithaml V, Berry L. SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Retailing: critical concepts. 2002;64(1):140.

Cronin Jr JJ, Taylor SA. Measuring service quality: a reexamination and extension. The journal of marketing. 1992:55-68.

Silva DS, Moraes GHSMd, Makiya IK, Cesar FIG. Measurement of perceived service quality in higher education institutions: A review of HEdPERF scale use. Quality Assurance in Education. 2017;25(4):415-39.

Soutar G, McNeil M. Measuring service quality in a tertiary institution. Journal of Educational Administration. 1996;34(1):72-82.

Icli G, Anil N. The HEDQUAL scale: A new measurement scale of service quality for MBA programs in higher education. South African Journal of Business Management. 2014;45(3):31-43.

Anderson EA. Measuring service quality at a university health clinic. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance. 1995;8(2):32-7.

Athanassopoulos A, Gounaris S, Stathakopoulos V. Behavioural responses to customer satisfaction: an empirical study. European journal of marketing. 2001;35(5/6):687-707.

Raghavan S, Ganesh R. Addressing Service Quality to Increase Students’ Satisfaction and Retention in Malaysian Private Higher Education Institutions. American Journal of Economics. 2015;5(2):243-50.

Westbrook RA. A rating scale for measuring product/service satisfaction. The Journal of Marketing. 1980:68-72.

Sureshchandar G, Rajendran C, Anantharaman R. The relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction–a factor specific approach. Journal of services marketing. 2002;16(4):363-79.

De Ruyter K, Bloemer J, Peeters P. Merging service quality and service satisfaction. An empirical test of an integrative model. Journal of economic psychology. 1997;18(4):387-406.

Brady MK, Robertson CJ. Searching for a consensus on the antecedent role of service quality and satisfaction: an exploratory cross-national study. Journal of Business research. 2001;51(1):53-60.

Bharwana TK, Bashir M, Mohsin M. Impact of service quality on customers’ satisfaction: A study from service sector especially private colleges of Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications. 2013;3(5):1-7.

Rego LL, Morgan NA, Fornell C. Reexamining the market share–customer satisfaction relationship. Journal of Marketing. 2013;77(5):1-20.

Stutely R. Numbers guide: Bloomberg Press; 2003.

Athiyaman A. Linking student satisfaction and service quality perceptions: the case of university education. European journal of marketing. 1997;31(7):528-40.

Bagozzi RP, Yi Y. Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science. 2012;40(1):8-34.

Fornell C, Larcker DF. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of marketing research. 1981:382-8.

Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL. Multivariate data analysis: Prentice hall Upper Saddle River, NJ; 1998.

MacKinnon DP, Goldberg L, Clarke GN, Elliot DL, Cheong J, Lapin A, et al. Mediating mechanisms in a program to reduce intentions to use anabolic steroids and improve exercise self-efficacy and dietary behavior. Prevention Science. 2001;2(1):15-28.

Bolger N. Data analysis in social psychology. Handbook of social psychology. 1998;1:233-65.

Kenny D, Kashy D, Bolger N. Data analysis in social psychology (In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.). The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 233–265). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill; 1998.

Downloads

Published

2018-05-17

How to Cite

kraa, jerry jay. (2018). EFFECT OF SERVICE QUALITY ON STUDENTS’ INTENTION TO PROVIDE FUNDING SUPPORT TO PRIVATE UNIVERSITIES IN GHANA: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF STUDENTS’ SATISFACTION. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 5(5). https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.55.4544