College Students’ Perceptions of their Core Competencies: An Institutional Analysis of Discipline and Gender


  • Sumeyra Sahbaz Virginia Tech
  • Steven M Culver Virginia Tech
  • Penny L Burge Virginia Tech



higher education, student learning outcomes, academic discipline, gender, student surveys


In this study we examined the perceptions of 1,852 senior college students’ knowledge, skills, and abilities as freshmen and as seniors at a large research-intensive university in the southeastern United States. From a list of twelve core skills (e.g., critical thinking, writing, oral communication, leadership), we examined the underlying factors at both freshman and senior levels and explored differences by gender and by academic discipline. Using principal components factor analysis two distinct dimensions were extracted: (1) collaborative learning skills and (2) personal development.  Using multiple multivariate analyses of variance (MANOVA), we found significant differences between male and female students in their perception of their skills and abilities both as entering and graduating college students in their oral communication skills, interpersonal skills and their ability to communicate with people different from themselves. Students from different academic disciplines (Engineering, Business, and Liberal Arts and Human Sciences) tended to perceive their proficiency level differently in terms of their interpersonal skills, leadership skills and ability to communicate with people different from themselves. Knowing areas where students differ in their skills and abilities can help faculty, administrators, and staff to re-examine curricula and to offer opportunities for all students to realize the personal, social, economic, and occupational benefits of a college education.


Author Biographies

Sumeyra Sahbaz, Virginia Tech

Doctoral Candidate

Educational Research and Evaluation

Steven M Culver, Virginia Tech

Assistant Provost for Assessment and Evaluation

Penny L Burge, Virginia Tech


Educational Research and Evaluation


Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2007). College learning for the new global century. Washington, DC: AAC&U.

Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass.

Bowman, N. A. (2010).The development of psychological well-being among first-year college students. Journal of College Student Development, 51, 2, 180-200.

Chatman, S. (2007). Institutional versus academic discipline measures of student experience: A matter of relative validity. Center for Studies in Higher Education Research & Occasional Paper Series, CSHE.8.07. Berkeley: University of California.

Douglass, J. A., Thomson, G., & Zhao, C-M. (2012). The learning outcomes race: The value of self-reported gains in large research universities. Higher Education, 64, 317-335.

Dugan, J. P., & Komives, S. (2010). Influences on college students’ capacities for socially responsible leadership. Journal of College Student Development, 51, 5, 525-549.

Ewell, P. T. (2009). Assessment, accountability, and improvement.(Occasional Paper No. 1). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois and Indiana University, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment.

Ewell, P. (2013). The Lumina Degree Qualifications Profile (DQP): Implications for Assessment.(Occasional Paper No.16). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois and Indiana University, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment.

Feldman, K. A., Smart, J. C, & Ethington, C. A. (1999). Major field and person-environment fit: using Holland's theory to study change and stability of college students. Journal of Higher Education, 70(6), 642-669.

Gasiewski, J. A., Eagan, M. K., Garcia, G. A., Hurtado, S., & Chang, M. J. (2012). From gatekeeping to engagement: A multicontextual, mixed method study of student academic engagement in introductory STEM courses. Research in Higher Education, 53, 229-261.

Jones, A. (2009). Redisciplining generic attributes: the disciplinary context in focus.Studies in Higher Education, 34, 85-100.

Jones, G. A. (2008). Can provincial universities be global institutions? Rethinking the institution as the unit of analysis in the study of globalization and higher education. Higher Education Policy, 21, 457-468.

Jones, W. A. (2011). Variation among academic disciplines: An update on analytical frameworks and research. The Journal of the Professoriate, 6, 1, 9-27.

Kim, Y. K., & Sax, L. (2007). Different patterns of student-faculty interaction in research universities: An analysis by student gender, race, SES, and first-generation status. Berkeley, CA: Center for Studies in Higher Education, pp. 1-20.

Kim, Y. K., & Sax, L. (2009). Student–faculty interaction in research universities: Differences by student gender, race, social class, and first-generation status. Research in Higher Education, 50, 437-459.

Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J., Bridges, B., & Hayek, J. C. (2007).Piecing together the student success puzzle: Research, propositions, and recommendations.ASHE Higher Education Report, 32 (5). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Kuh, G.D., &Ewell, P. T. (2010). The state of learning outcomes assessment in the United States. Higher Education Management and Policy, 22, 1, 9-28.

Li, G., Long, S., & Simpson, M. E. (1999). Self-perceived gains in critical thinking and communication skills: Are there disciplinary differences. Research in Higher Education, 40(1), 43-60.

Lord, S. M., Prince, M. J., Stefanou, C. R., Stolk, J. D., & Chen, J. C. (2012). The effect of different active learning environments on student outcomes related to lifelong learning.Paper 15.

Maki, P. L. (2004). Assessing for learning: Building a sustainable commitment across the

Institution. Sterling, VA: Stylus.

Moss-Racusin, C., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll,V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 41, 16474-16479.

Neem, J. N. (2013). Experience matters: Why competency-based education will not replace seat time. Liberal Education, 99, 4, 26-29.

Nora, A., Cabrera, A., Hagedom, L. S., & Pascarella, E. (1996).Differential impacts of academic and social experiences on college-related behavioral outcomes across different ethnic and gender groups at four-year institutions. Research in Higher Education, 37(4), 427-45.

Pascarella, E.T. (1976). Perceptions of the college environment by students in different academic majors in two colleges of arts and sciences. Research in Higher Education, 4(2), 165-176.

Pascarella, E. T. (2006). How college affects students: Ten directions for future research. Journal of College Student Development, 47, 5, 508-520.

Pascarella, E. T., &Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Pike, G. R. (1992). Using mixed-effect structural equation models to study student growth and development. Review of Higher Education 15(2), 151-177.

Pike, G. R., & Killian, T. (2001). Reported gains in student learning: Do academic disciplines make a difference? Research in Higher Education, 42, 117-139.

Ramaley, J., & Leskes, A. (2002). Greater Expectations: A new vision for learning as a nation goes to college. National Panel Report, Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.

Rocca, K. A. (2010). Student participation in the college classroom: An extended multidisciplinary literature review. Communication Education, 59, 2, 185-213.

Sax, L. J., Jacobs, J. A., & Riggers, T. A. (2010). Women’s representation in science and technology (STEM) fields of study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Indianapolis, IN.

Steedle, J., & Bradley, M. (2012). Majors matter: Differential performance on a test of general college outcomes. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, Canada.

Tatum, H. E., Schwartz, B. M., Schimmoeller, P. A., & Perry, N. (2013). Classroom participation and student-faculty interactions: Does gender matter? The Journal of Higher Education, 84, 6, 745-768.

Vuong, M., Brown-Welty, S., & Trac, S. (2010). The effects of self-efficacy on academic success of first-generation college sophomore students. Journal of College Student Development, 51, 1, 50-64.

Wawrzynski, M. R., &Sedlacek, W. E. (2003). Race and gender differences in the transfer

student experience. Journal of College Student Development, 44(4), 489-501.

Zafar, B. (2013). College major choice and the gender gap. Journal of Human Resources, 48, 3, 545-595.




How to Cite

Sahbaz, S., Culver, S. M., & Burge, P. L. (2014). College Students’ Perceptions of their Core Competencies: An Institutional Analysis of Discipline and Gender. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 1(5), 123–135.