Does coercive pressure improve construction quality? The mediating role of organizational learning

  • Zhi-hong Song Shanxi University
  • Yangyuan Chen Shanxi University
  • Dong-mei Lee Shanxi University
Keywords: Coercive pressure, Organizational learning, Construction quality, Structural equation modeling

Abstract

Combining institutional theory and organizational learning theory, the article develops a conceptual model which describes the relationships among coercive pressure, organizational learning, and construction quality. Data were then collected via 268 valid questionnaires from construction firms located in Taiyuan in central China. Hypotheses in the conceptual model were tested with structural equation modeling. The empirical results reveal that: (1) coercive pressure has a significant positive impact on organizational learning; (2) organizational learning has a significant positive impact on construction quality; (3) organizational learning mediates the relationship between coercive pressure and construction quality. The empirical results may provide implications for Chinese construction firms aiming at improve construction quality.

Author Biographies

Zhi-hong Song, Shanxi University
Institute of Management and Decision
Yangyuan Chen, Shanxi University
School of Economics and Management
Dong-mei Lee, Shanxi University
School of Mathematical Sciences

References

Arditi, D., & Gunaydin, H. M. (1997). Total quality management in the construction process. International Journal of Project Management,15(4), 235-243.

Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2), 177-194. Richard P. Bagozzi, & Youjae Yi. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.

Baker, W. E., & Sinkula, J. M. (1999). The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(4), 411-427.

Berrone, P., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2009). Environmental performance and executive compensation: an integrated agency-institutional perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 103-126.

Delmas, M., & Toffel, M. W. (2004). Stakeholders and environmental management practices: an institutional framework. Business Strategy & the Environment, 13(4), 209-222.

Dimaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.

Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., & Ali, S. S. (2015). Exploring the relationship between leadership, operational practices, institutional pressures and environmental performance: a framework for green supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 160, 120-132.

Fiol,C.M., Lyles,M.A. (1985).Organizational Learning. Academy of Management Review, 10 (4),803-813.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50..

Huber, G. (1991).Organizational learning: The Contribution Processes and the Literatures. Organization Science, 2(1),88-115.

Ingram, P., & Silverman, B. S. (2002). The new institutionalism in strategic management /. The new institutionalism in strategic management. JAI.

Jennings, P. D., & Zandbergen, P. A. (1995). Ecologically sustainable organizations: an institutional approach. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 1015-1052..

Kassinis, G., & Vafeas, N. (2006). Stakeholder pressures and environmental performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 145-159.

Khanna, M. (2002). Corporate environmental management: regulatory and market-based incentives. Land Economics, 78(4), 539-558.

Lee, J., Veloso, F. M., Hounshell, D. A., & Rubin, E. S. (2010). Forcing technological change: a case of automobile emissions control technology development in the us. Technovation, 30(4), 249-264.

Levitt,B., March, J.G. (1988).Organizational Learning.Annual Review of Sociology, 14(3),319-340.

Lin, L. H., & Ho, Y. L. (2016). Institutional pressures and environmental performance in the global automotive industry: the mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Long Range Planning, 49(6), 764-775.

March, J.G. (1991).Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning.Organization Science, 2(1):71-87.

Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145-179.

Roome, N., & Wijen, F. (2006). Stakeholder power and organizational learning in corporate environmental management. Ulb Institutional Repository, 27(2), 235-263.

Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (1995). Market orientation and the learning organization. Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 63-74.

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610.

Taylor, M. R., Rubin, E. S., & Hounshell, D. A. (2005). Control of so{sub 2 emissions from power plants: a case of induced technological innovation in the us. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 72(6), 697-718.

Taylor, M. R., Rubin, E. S., & Hounshell, D. A. (2003). Effect of government actions on technological innovation for so2 control. Environmental Science & Technology, 37(20), 4527-34.

Yiu, D., & Makino, S. (2002). The choice between joint venture and wholly owned subsidiary: an institutional perspective. Organization Science, 13(6), 667-683.

Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. H. (2012). Internationalization and environmentally-related organizational learning among chinese manufacturers. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 79(1), 142-154.

Qinghua Zhu, & Joseph Sarkis. (2007). The moderating effects of institutional pressures on emergent green supply chain practices and performance. International Journal of Production Research, 45(18-19), 4333-4355.

Published
2018-01-26
How to Cite
Song, Z.- hong, Chen, Y., & Lee, D.- mei. (2018). Does coercive pressure improve construction quality? The mediating role of organizational learning. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.51.4085