Multilevel Predictors Influencing Reading Achievement: Comparison of Teacher Effects in Elementary, Middle and High Schools

Main Article Content

Bidya Raj Subedi

Abstract

This paper determined significant predictors of reading achievement at student and teacher levels employing a two-level hierarchical linear model (HLM). Teacher effects were computed for elementary, middle, and high schools. The study found significant effects of race, learning disability, participation in free and reduced lunch, proficiency in English language, attendance and suspension at student level. The predictors such as experience in teaching, academic degree, and the teachers ratings based on student performance were significant at teacher level. The comparison of teacher effects showed the highest and lowest teacher effects in elementary and high schools, respectively.

Article Details

How to Cite
Subedi, B. R. (2017). Multilevel Predictors Influencing Reading Achievement: Comparison of Teacher Effects in Elementary, Middle and High Schools. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 4(23). https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.423.3944
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Bidya Raj Subedi, School District of Palm Beach County, Florida USA

Specialist, Evaluation and Test Development

Department of Research and Evaluation

References

Adderley, Z. T. (2013). Predicting academic outcomes for third grade students: Examining the reading achievement of diverse students using the diagnostic lens of the dynamic indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills. An unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5821&context=etd.
Arica, E. (2006). Achievement and enrolment status of suspended students: Outcomes in a large, multicultural school district. Education and Urban Society, 38(3), 359-369. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124506286947
Bankston, C., & Caldas, S. J. (1996). Majority African American schools and social injustice: The in?uence of de facto segregation on academic achievement. Social Forces, 75(2), 535 – 555.
Caldas, S. J., & Iii, C. L. (1997). The effect of school population socioeconomic status on individual student academic achievement. The Journal of Educational Research 90(5), 269-277.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271945650_The_Effect_of_School_Population_Socioeconomic_Status_on_Individual_Student_Academic_Achievement
Croninger, R. G., Rice, J. K., Rathbun, A., & Nishio, M. (2007). Teacher qualifications and early learning: Effects of certification, degree, and experience on first-grade student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 26(3), 312-324.
Eamon, M. K. (2002). Effects of poverty on mathematics and reading achievement of young
adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 22(1), 49 – 74.
FDOE (2015). Florida standards assessments 2014-15: Evidence of reliability and validity (Volume 4). Tallahassee, Florida: Florida Department of Education. http://www.fldoe.org/core/fileparse.php/5663/urlt/1415TechV4FSA.pdf
Goldhaber, D., & Brewer, D. (1998). Why should we reward degrees for teachers? Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 134-138. https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1-21239727/when-should-we-reward-degrees-for-teachers
Gottfried, M. A. (2009). Excused versus unexcused: How student absences in elementary school affect academic achievement. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 392-415.
Hampton, N. Z., Mason, E. (2003). Learning disabilities, gender, sources of efficacy, self-efficacy beliefs, and academic achievement in high school students. Journal of School Psychology, 41(2), 101-112.
Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J. F., & Rivkin, S. G. (2004). Why public schools lose teachers. Journal of Human Resources, 39(2), 326–354.
Harris, D. N. & Sass, T. R. (2008). Teacher training, teacher quality and student achievement. National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Educational Research, Urban Institute. https://caldercenter.org/sites/default/files/1001059_Teacher_Training.pdf
Haycock, K. (1998). Good teaching matters: How well-qualified teachers can close the gap. Thinking K-16, 3, 1-14. Washington DC: The Education Trust.
Kieffer, M. J. (2008). Catching up or falling behind? Initial English proficiency, concentrated poverty, and the reading growth of language minority learners in the United States. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 851-868. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.4.851
Levine, D. U., & Eubanks, E. E. (1990). Achievement disparities between minority and
non-minority students in suburban schools. Journal of Negro Education, 59(2), 186–194.
Ortiz, V. (1986). Reading activities and reading pro?ciency among Hispanic, Black, and White
students. American Journal of Education, 95(1), 58–76.
Peslak, A. R. (2004). An empirical study of the effect of information technology expenditures
on student achievement. Information Research, 9(4). Retrieved July 26, 2004, from
http://informationr.net/ir/9- 4/paper185.html
Raudenbush, S. W. & Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models in social and behavioral research: Applications and data analysis methods (second edition). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Rice J. K. (2010). The impact of teacher experience: Examining the evidence and policy implications. Washington, DC: National Center for the Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research, Urban Institute.
http://www.uvvrban.org/uploadedpdf/1001455-impact-teacher-experience.pdf.
Rowan, B., Correnti, R., & Miller, R. (2002). What large-scale, survey research tells us about teacher effects on student achievement; Insights from the “Prospects’ study of elementary schools. Teachers College Record, 104(8), 1525-1567.
Singer, J. D. (1998). Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 23(4), 323-355.