Business Incubation Performance in the Malaysian ICT Sector


  • Fararishah Binti Abdul Khalid Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
  • Juhaini Jabar Faculty of Technology Management and Technopreneurship. Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
  • Aminuddin Ahmad Kayani Faculty of Engineering Technology Multimedia University
  • David Gilbert RMIT University



Business incubator, incubation performance


This paper presents research on ICT incubation performance in Malaysia detailing contrasting outcomes predicated upon a number of factors modelled in this study including ‘Selection Performance’, ‘Monitoring and Business Assistance Intensity’, ‘Resource Allocation’, and ‘Professional Management Services’. It also aims at addressing the lack of knowledge concerning the underlying components impacting on ICT incubation performance in Malaysia. Building on the theoretical work of researchers in the field such as Hackett & Dilts (2004; 2008) who analysed the literature in chronological order identifying five primary research orientations in incubation (incubator development; incubator configurations; incubatee development; incubator-incubation impacts; and theorising about business incubation); four research propositions were developed for this study. A total of 180 participants were asked to respond to a questionnaire and 118 useable responses were received yielding a response rate of 65.6%. The research results highlight that a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach is inappropriate. Whilst the four propositions developed for this research were all confirmed, it is telling that highly performed incubator firms were very much in the minority. Interestingly, resources provided became less significant as incubatees became more profitable whilst targeted professional management services increased in significance suggesting that as profitability improves the need for capability development increases.


Abdullah, R. N. (2009). Self Esteem , Gender and Academic Achievement of Undergraduate Students. American Journal of Scientific Research, 3(3), 26–37.

Abdul Khalid, F., Gilbert, D., Huq, A. (2012). Third-generation busniess incubation practices in Malaysian ICT Incubators - A bridge too far? American Journal of Management 12 (2/3), 88-107

Aerts, K., Matthyssens, P., & Vandenbempt, K. (2007). Critical role and screening practices of European business incubators. Technovation, 27(5), 254–267.

Albert, P., & Bernasconi, M. (2002). Incubators : the Emergence of a New Industry a Comparison of the Players and Their Strategies : Finance.

Bergek, A., & Norrman, C. (2008). Incubator best practice: A framework. Technovation, 28(1-2), 20–28.

Bruneel, J., Ratinho, T., Clarysse, B., Groen, a, & Cock, R. D. E. (2010). Incubation Centers : Comparing Their Support. Agse 2010, 861–875. Retrieved from

Bruneel, J., Ratinho, T., Clarysse, B., & Groen, A. (2012). The evolution of Business incubators: Comparing demand and supply of business incubation services across different incubator generations. Technovation, 32(2), 110–121.

Bulsara, H. P., Porey, P. D., & Gandhi, S. (2010). Commercialization of technology innovations and patents - Issues and challenges. In K. Ramanathan, S. Nanjundappa, S. Satyabrata, G. Clar, & M. Henzler (Eds.), Asia-Pacific Tech Monitor (p. 66). Asian and Pacific Centre for Transfer of Technology. Retrieved from

Chan, K. F., & Lau, T. (2005). Assessing technology incubator programs in the science park: The good, the bad and the ugly. Technovation, 25(10), 1215–1228.

Che Senik, Z. (2010). Models, processes, and factors influencing internationalization: The case of Malaysian SMEs.

Costa-David, J., Malan, J., & Lalkaka, R. (2002). Improving Business Incubator Performance through Benchmarking and Evaluation -_- Lessons learned from Europe.pdf. Nbia, 27.

Grimaldi, R., & Grandi, A. (2005). Business incubators and new venture creation: An assessment of incubating models. Technovation, 25(2), 111–121.

Hackett, S. M. (2004). Real options and the option to incubate: An exploratory study of the process of business incubation.

Hackett, S. M., & Dilts, D. M. (2008). Inside the black box of business incubation: Study B - Scale assessment, model refinement, and incubation outcomes. Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(5), 439–471.

Hamdani, D. (2006). Conceptualizing and measuring Business Incubation. Statistics Canada, 1(S3), 1–25.<774::AID-CNCR2820671404>3.0.CO;2-I

Infodev. (2008). Promoting ICT-enabled Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Developing Countries through Business incubation.

Lumpkin, J. R., & Ireland, R. D. (1988). Screening Practices of New Business Incubators : The Evaluation of Critical Success Factors. American Journal of Small Business, Spring, 59–82.

McAdam, M., & McAdam, R. (2008). High tech start-ups in University Science Park incubators: The relationship between the start-up’s lifecycle progression and use of the incubator's resources. Technovation, 28(5), 277–290.

Mian, S. A. (1994). US university-sponsored technology incubators : an overview of management , policies and performance, 14(8), 515–528.

National Business Incubation Association, 2012 White Paper Series. Accessed January 18, 2016. (

Peters, L., Rice, M., & Sundararajan, M. (2004). The Role of Incubators in the Entrepreneurial Process. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29, 83–91.

Ramasamy, B., Chakrabarty, A. & Cheah, M. (2003). Malaysia’s leap into the future: an evaluation of the multimedia super corridor. Technovation, 24(11), 871–883.

Sun, H., & Leung, J. (2007). Critical Success Factors for Technological Incubation : Case Study of Hong Kong Science and Technology Parks, 24(2), 346–364.

Warren, L., Patton, D., & Bream, D. (2009). Knowledge acquisition processes during the incubation of new high technology firms. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 5(4), 481–495.

Knopp, L. 2012 ‘State of the business incubation industry’. NBIA Publications pp.1-66 ISBN: 978-1-887183-72-7




How to Cite

Abdul Khalid, F. B., Jabar, J., Ahmad Kayani, A., & Gilbert, D. (2017). Business Incubation Performance in the Malaysian ICT Sector. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 4(17).

Most read articles by the same author(s)