When Less Is More: A Group Of First Year Undergraduate Malaysian Students’ Experiences Of The Essay Revision Process.

Authors

  • Suyansah Swanto Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia
  • Wardatul Akmam din Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia
  • Siti Jamilah Bidin Universiti Utara Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.11.31

Abstract

The teaching of English as a second language (ESL) in Malaysia has undergone many changes. Different ways of looking at and employing pedagogical approaches in Malaysian ESL classrooms have been considered and attempted; some of these have not only altered but also challenged traditional approaches in the classroom. However, writing, seen by many Malaysian students as the most difficult of the four, has often been neglected. ESL teachers cannot be entirely blamed for this minimal emphasis on composition writing. Factors, which work against both the teachers and students, include the time factor, which inevitably compels teachers to focus on a product-based rather than process-based writing. Although there is an extensive body of research on process-oriented first language writing, little attention has been given to second language classroom practice. Therefore, researchers who examine ESL writers in Malaysian universities are required to determine whether the process-oriented approach to teaching writing can be used effectively with ESL students so that the gap between the actual level of English language proficiency amongst Malaysian university students, especially writing skills, and the level of competence required for learning at tertiary levels can be bridged relatively quickly. This paper reports the finding of one of the research activities looking at the contribution of a teaching intervention based on the process centered approach; i.e. the types of revision changes employed by this group of students in developing the drafts. Revising is the process of making sure that the writing says what the writer wants it to say.

Author Biographies

Suyansah Swanto, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia

DEPUTY DEAN OF ACADEMIC, SCHOOL OF EDUCATION.

Wardatul Akmam din, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia

Senior Lecturer

Siti Jamilah Bidin, Universiti Utara Malaysia

Senior Lecturer in Applied Linguistics

References

Al-Hazmi, S. and Scholfield, P. (1999). ‘The effect of peer feedback versus self-assessment on the quality and revision of compositions word-processed by advanced ESL learners.’ In Marthan Pennington (ed.) (1999), 95-130.

Ali, Z. and Md. Yunus, M. 2004. An ESL Writing Course: Unraveling Students’ Needs And Concerns. The English Teacher Vol XXXIII. MELTA: Kuala Lumpur.

Beyer, B. 1979. ‘Writing to learn in Social Studies: pre-writing and rewriting to learn’. Social Education, 187-189.

Bisaillon, J. (1999). ‘Effects of the teaching of revision strategies in a computer-based environment.’ In Martha Pennington (ed.) (1999), 131-157.

Bruffee, K. A. 1983. "Writing and Reading as Collaborative Or Social Acts." In the Writer's Mind: Writing as a Mode of Thinking. College English 46(7): 159-169.

Calkins, L. 1982. A Study of Children's Rewriting. Final Report for NCTE Research Foundation Project No. 80: 11, p. 405.

Calkins, L. 1983. Lessons from a Child: On the Teaching and Learning of Writing. Portsmouth, New Hampshire: Heinemann.

Carter, R. 1997. Investigating English Discourse: Language, Literacy and Literature. London: Routledge.

Doushaq, H. and Al Makhzoomy, K. (1989). ‘A study of teachers’ evaluation of English composition in secondary schools in Jordan’. Arab Journal for the Humanities, 9: 388-404.

Elbow, P. 1973. Writing Without Teachers. London: Oxford University Press.

Faigley, L. 1986. Competing Theories of Process: A Critique and a Proposal. College English, 48: 527-542.

Fathman, A. and Whalley, E. (1990). ‘Teacher response to student writing: focus on form versus content’. In Kroll, B. (1990) (ed.) Second Language Writing: Research Insights for the Classroom, 178-190. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fitzgerald, J. (1987). Research on revision in writing. Review of Educational Research, 57, 481–506.

Graves, D. 1983. Teachers and Children at Work. London and Portsmouth, New Hampshire: Heinemann.

Graves, D. A. 1984. Researchers Learns to Write: Selected Articles and Monographs. Exeter, New Hampshire: Heinemann.

Halimah, A. (1991). EST Writing: Rhetorically Processed and Produced. A Case Study of Kuwaiti Learners. Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of Essex.

Hampton, S. (1995). Strategies for increasing achievement in writing. In R.W. Cole (Ed.) Educating Everybody’s Children: what research and practice say about improving achievement (pp. 293-321). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum development.

Hedge, T. 2000. Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hillocks, G. 1986. Research on Written Composition: New Directions for Teaching. New York: National Conference on Research in English.

Kantor, K. J. 1984. Classroom Contexts and the Development of Writing Intuitions: An Ethnographic Case Study. In New Directions in Composition Research. New York: Guilford, pp. 72-94.

Leki, I. 1990. Coaching from the Margins: Issues in Written Response. In B. Kroll (ed.) Second Language Writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 57-68.

Leki, I. 1991. The Preferences of ESL Students for Error Correction in College Level Writing Classes. Foreign Language Annals. 24(3): 203–218.

Macrorie, K. 1984. Writing to Be Read. Upper Monclair, New Jersey: Boynton/Cook.

McCormick, K. (Ed.). (1989). Expanding the repertoire: An anthology of practical approaches for the teaching of writing. (Tech. Rep. No. 2-038-882). Berkeley, CA: Center for the Study if Writing.

Moffett, J. 1983. Teaching the Universe of Discourse. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Morais, E. 2000. Reading, Thinking and Writing in an ESL Context. Kuala Lumpur: The Beacon Press Sdn. Bhd.

Murray, D. 1982. Learning by Teaching: Selected Articles on Writing and Teaching. Upper Montclair, New Jersey: Boynton/Cook.

Nilson, L. B. 2002. Helping Students Help Each Other: Making Peer Feedback More Valuable. Essays in Teaching Excellence 14(8): 1-2.

Polio, C., Fleck, C. and Leder, N. (1998). ‘ “If only I had more time:” ESL learners’ changes in linguistic accuracy on essay revisions’. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7: 43-68.

Pond, K., R. Ulhaq and W. Wade. 1995. Peer-Review: A Precursor to Peer Assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International. 32: 314-323.

Raimes, A. 1979. 'A Grammar for Composition: the Grammar of Cohesion'. Paper presented at Thirteenth Annual TESOL Convention, Boston, Massachusetts.

Rijlaarsdam, G., Berg, H.V.D., & Couzijn, M. (eds.) (2005). Effective learning and teaching of writing: A handbook of writing in education (2nd ed.) Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Smit, D.W. (1991). Improving student writing. Idea Paper No 25. Kansas: Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development.

Sommers, N. 1980. Revision Strategies of Student Writers and Experienced Adult Writers. College Composition and Communication; 31:378-388.

Spack, R. (1984). ‘Invention strategies and the ESL College composition student’. TESOL Quarterly, 18: 649-668.

Stallard, C. (1974). ‘An analysis of the writing behavior of good student writers’. Research in the Teaching of English, 8: 206-218.

Strachan, I. B. and S. Wilcox. 1996. Peer and Self Assessment of Group Work: Developing an Effective Response to Increased Enrolment in a Third-Year Course in Microclimatology. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. 20: 343-353.

Svinicki, M. D. 2001. Encouraging Your Students to Give Feedback. In K. G. Lewis (ed.) Techniques and Strategies for Interpreting Student Evaluations. New Directions in Teaching and Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Vol 87: 17-24.

Taylor, B.C. 1976. Recent Research on Writing Pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 21:687-715.

Topping, K. 1998. Peer-Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities. Review of Educational Research. 68: 249-276.

Zamel, V. 1982. Writing: The Process of Discovering Meaning. TESOL Quarterly. 16: 159-209.

Zamel, V. 1983. The Composing Processes of Advanced ESL Students: Six Case Studies. TESOL Quarterly. 17: 165-187.

Downloads

Published

2014-02-03

How to Cite

Swanto, S., din, W. A., & Bidin, S. J. (2014). When Less Is More: A Group Of First Year Undergraduate Malaysian Students’ Experiences Of The Essay Revision Process. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 1(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.11.31