Criminal Justice’s Ailing Role
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.42.2668Keywords:
Community, Court, Criminal, Interest, Institution, Justice, Legitimate, Public, Victim.Abstract
The general philosophy of social contrcat is premised on the notion that the state assumes the role of maintaining social relation through diverse political ideas and strategies. Within the context of this historical arrangement, the institution of criminal justice has been foremost in shaping the relationship between members of the community by defining rights and sanctions. These socio-legal trajectories that developed through theories and policies have continued to define the various strategies of crime control as well as the jurisprudence of punishment. It has also been the key measure for the legitimacy of crime control and other dispute resolution technics (Davies et al. 2009). Being a significant component in the formation of political systems, the institution of criminal justice has also developed to encapsulate the values of democracy, constitionalism and human rights. It is from these ideas that criminal justice institutions mainly the police, the prosecutors, the courts and prisons derived their legitimacy, that are today seen by many as the ideal mechanism for maintaining social order. These agencies have, over time, gained prominence within the framework of a larger political order, engaging themselves as some “product of incremental enlightenment, benevolence, and a consensual society” (Burke 2012: 194). Despite these lofty assumptions about the role of criminal justice in the society, this paper argues that the policies and practices in criminal justice are far from benign. By bringing to discourse the contemporary realities of penal justice, this paper argues that many of the traditional values of criminal justice have been tremendously altered; conventional narratives are replaced by a new kind of penology. This includes the way in which the role and rights of various parties and participants in the system have been reconfigured as well as the economic way of thinking that is steadily disrupting the balance and objectives of the entire institution of criminal justice.
References
Armstrong, S. (2014). Capacity as Philosophy: A Review of Richard Lippke’s, The Ethics of Plea Bargaining. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 8(1), 265-281.
Ashworth, A. (1998). The Impact on Criminal Justice, in B. Markensis (Ed.) The Impact of the Human Rights Bill on English Law.
Ashworth, A. (2010). Sentencing and Criminal Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baldwin, J., and McConville, M. (1979). Plea Bargaining and Plea Negotiation in England. Law and Society Review, 13 (2), 287–307.
Baldwin, J., and McConville, M. (1979). Plea Bargaining and the Court of Appeal. British Journal of Law and Society, 6 (2), 200-218.
Bayley, D. (2001). ‘Security and Justice for All’, in H. Strang and J. Braithwaite (Eds.), Restorative Justice and Civil Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bazemore, G., and Schiff, M. (2015). Restorative community justice: Repairing harm and transforming communities. Routledge.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
Benson, B., and Kim, I. (2014). Causes and Consequences of Over-Criminalization. Dept. of Economics Working Paper, SungKyunKwan University.
Bottigliero, I. (2013). Redress for victims of crimes under international law. Springer.
Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, Shame, and Reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brooten, L., Ashraf, S. I., and Akinro, N. A. (2015). Traumatized victims and mutilated bodies: Human rights and the ‘politics of immediation’in the Rohingya crisis of Burma/Myanmar. International Communication Gazette, 77(8), 717-734.
Burke, R. H. (2012). An introduction to criminological theory. Routledge.
Burkhardt, B. C., and Jones, A. (2016). Judicial Intervention into Prisons: Comparing Private and Public Prisons from 1990 to 2005. Justice System Journal, 37(1), 39-52.
Clapham, A. (2015). Human rights: a very short introduction. OUP Oxford.
Cloyd, J. W. (1979). Prosecution’s Power, Procedural Rights, and Pleading Guilty: The Problem of Coercion in Plea Bargaining Drug Cases. Social Problems, 26 (4), 452–466.
Conklin, R. R. (1979). Constitutional Constraints on Prosecutorial Discretion in Plea Bargaining. Houston Law Review, 17, 753-774.
Crawford, A. (1997). The Local Governance of Crime. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Damaska, M. R. (1986). The faces of justice and state authority: a comparative approach to the legal process. Yale University Press.
Davis, A., Maxwell, S. and, Director, M., and Kingdom, U. (1971). Sentences for Sale-A New Look at Plea Bargaining in England and America, Part 1. Criminal Law Review, 1971(1), 150–161.
de Souza, S. P. (2016). Evaluating ‘Access to Justice in Informal Justice Systems: A Suggestive Framework. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Online, 19(1), 469-504.
Dripps, D. A. (2015). Guilt, Innocence, and Due Process of Plea Bargaining. William & Mary Law Review, Forthcoming.
Duff, P. (2000). The defendant's right to trial by jury: A neighbour's view. Criminal Law Review, 85-94.
Easton, S., and Piper, C. (2012). Sentencing and Punishment: The Quest for Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellickson, R. C. (1989). Bringing culture and human frailty to rational actors: A critique of classical law and economics. Chi.-Kent L. Rev., 65, 23.
Ericson, R. V., and Haggerty K. D. (1997). Policing the Risk Society. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Fattah, E. A. (Ed.). (2016). From crime policy to victim policy: Reorienting the justice system. Springer.
Feeley, M., and Simmons, J. (1994). Actuarial Justice: The emerging New Criminal Law, in Nelken, D., (Ed.) Futures of Criminology. London: Sage.
Garland, D. (1996). The Limits of the Sovereign State Strategies of Crime Control in Contemporary Society. British Journal of Criminology, 36 (4), 445–471.
Garland, D. (1999), Editorial: Punishment and Society Today. Punishment and Society, 5-10.
Garland, D. (2001). The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gazal, O., and Bar-Gill, O. (2004). Plea Bargains Only for the Guilty. University of Michigan Program in Law and Economics Archive: 2003-2009.
Goldstein, A. S. (1982), Defining the Role of the Victim in Criminal Prosecution. Mississippi Law Journal, 52, 515-561.
Hough, M., Radford, B., Jackson, J., and Roberts, J. R. (2013). Attitudes to sentencing and trust in justice: exploring trends from the crime survey for England and Wales. Ministry of Justice analytical series, Ministry of Justice, London, UK.
Jennings, W., Farrall, S., Gray, E., and Hay, C. (2016). Penal Populism and the Public Thermostat: Crime, Public Punitiveness, and Public Policy. Governance.
Jones, T., and Newburn, T. (2005). Comparative Criminal Justice Policy-Making in the United States and the United Kingdom The Case of Private Prisons. British Journal of Criminology, 45(1), 58-80.
Kaye, T. A (2014). Innovation in the war on tax evasion. BYU L. Rev., 363.
Kemshall, H., and Maguire, M. (2013). Sex offenders, risk penality and the problem of disclosure to the community. Sex Offenders in the Community, 102.
Lacey, N. (1988). State Punishment. London: Routledge.
Laxminarayan, M., Bosmans, M., Porter, R., and Sosa, L. (2013). Victim satisfaction with criminal justice: A systematic review. Victims & Offenders, 8(2), 119-147.
Ma, Y. (2002). Prosecutorial Discretion and Plea Bargaining in the United States, France, Germany, and Italy: A Comparative Perspective. International Criminal Justice Review, 12(1), pp. 22–52.
Maffei, S. (2004). Negotiations “on Evidence” and Negotiations “on Sentence” Adversarial Experiments in Italian Criminal Procedure. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 2(4), 1050–1069.
Marcus, P., Brook, C. A., Fiannaca, B., Harvey, D. J., McEwan, J., and Pomerance, R. (2016). A Comparative Look at Plea Bargaining in Australia, Canada, England, New Zealand, and the United States. William & Mary Law Review, 57.
McConville, M., and Wilson, G. (2002). The Handbook of the Criminal Justice Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McCormick, N., and Garland, D. (1998). Sovereign States and Vengeful Victims. Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory: Essays in Honour of Andrew von Hirsch.
McLachlin, B. (2000). Judicial Power and democracy. Sac Law Journal, 12, 311-330.
Morris, A. and Maxwell, G. (2000). ‘The Practice of Family Group Conferences in New Zealand: Assessing the Place, Potential and Pittfalls of Restorative Justice’, in Crawford, A. and Goodey, J., (eds.), Integrating a Victim Perspective Within Criminal Justice. Aldershot: Ashgate
Norris, C., Armstrong, G. (1999). The Maximum Surveillance Society: The Rise of CCTV. Oxford: Berg.
Punch, M. (2009). Police Corruption: Exploring Police Deviance and Crime. Willan Publishing.
Rauxloh, R. (2012). Plea bargaining in national and international law. Routledge.
Romano, R. (2015). 'The Great Force of History’: Collective Memory, White Innocence, and Making Black Lives Matter.
Sanders, A., and Young, R. P. (1994). Criminal Justice. Butterworths.
Sanders, A., H., Morgan, R. C., and Cape, E. (2001). Victim Impact Statements: Can’t Work, Won’t Work. Criminal Law Review, pp. 447–458.
Shapiro, M. (1986). Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. University of Chicago Press.
Siegel, L. J. (2009). Introduction to Criminal Justice. Cengage Learning.
Squires, P., and Lea, J. (2012). Criminalisation and Advanced Marginality: Critically Exploring the Work of Loïc Wacquant. The Policy Press.
Stitt, B. G., and Chaires, R. H. (1992). Plea Bargaining: Ethical Issues and Emerging Perspectives. The Justice Professional, 7(2), 69–91.
Thaman, S. (2010). World Plea Bargaining: Consensual Procedures and the Avoidance of the Full Criminal Trial. Durham, N.C.: Carolina Academic Press.
Van Dijk, P., Hoof, G. J., & Van Hoof, G. J. (1998). Theory and practice of the European Convention on Human Rights. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Von Hirsch, A. (1993). Censure and Sanctions. Oxford: Oxford University Press..
Wacquant, L. (2000). The New `Peculiar Institution’: On the Prison as Surrogate Ghetto. Theoretical Criminology, 4(3), 377–389.
Wacquant, L. (2010). Crafting the Neoliberal State: Workfare, Prisonfare, and Social Insecurity. In Sociological Forum 25 (2), 197-220. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Walklate, S. (2013). Victimology (Routledge Revivals): The Victim and the Criminal Justice Process. Routledge.
Wright, M. (1996). Justice for Victims and Offenders: A Restorative Response to Crime. Winchester: Waterside Press.
Wright, R., and Miller, M. (2002). The Screening/Bargaining Tradeoff. Stanford Law Review, 55(1), 29–118.
Wright, R., and Miller, M. (2003). Honesty and Opacity in Charge Bargains. Stanford Law Review, 55(4), pp. 1409–1417.
Yaroshefsky, E. (1989). Balancing Victim’s Rights and Vigorous Advocacy for the Defendant. Annual Survey of American Law, 135-155.
Zedner, L. (2004). Criminal Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zedner, L. (2006). Policing Before and After the Police the Historical Antecedents of Contemporary Crime Control. British Journal of criminology, 46(1), 78-96.
Zehr, H. (2015). The little book of restorative justice: revised and updated. Skyhorse Publishing, Inc.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors wishing to include figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
