Practicum Experiences of Prospective Teachers in Differentiating Instruction

Main Article Content

Stephen Joseph
Yvonne John

Abstract

This study examined the experiences of prospective teachers in differentiating instruction during a two-week practicum assignment in an inclusive environment. Several school types were used ranging from denominational and government-led primary schools with students of low socio-economic status, to special schools for the physically handicapped and deaf students. The study employed a mixed-method research design aimed at triangulating quantitative and qualitative data obtained from questionnaires, focus group discussions, field notes from classroom observations, and student reflections. The total population comprised twenty-two year three students pursuing a Bachelor of Education degree in Special Needs Education; two practicum advisors; and nine cooperating teachers. Findings of the study revealed that prospective teachers achieved a measure of success in implementing differentiated instruction in their practicum classrooms. However, some attention should be given to cooperating teachers who may not provide the support expected of a mentor or coach due to a general lack of understanding of the philosophy of differentiated instruction.  

 Keywords: practicum experiences, prospective teachers, differentiated instruction

Article Details

How to Cite
Joseph, S., & John, Y. (2014). Practicum Experiences of Prospective Teachers in Differentiating Instruction. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 1(3), 34. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.13.136
Section
Articles

References

Achinstein, B., & Barrett, A. (2004). (Re)framing classroom contexts: How new teachers and mentors view diverse learners and challenges of practice. Teachers College Record, 106, 716-747.
Bates, A. J., Ramirez, L., & Dritis, D. (2009). Connecting university supervision and critical reflection: Mentoring and modeling. The Teacher Educator, 44(2), 90-112.
Beck, C., & Kosnick, C. (2002). Components of a good practicum placement: student teacher perceptions. Teacher Education Quarterly, 29(2), 81-98.
Brighton, C. M., & Hertberg, H. L. (2004). Restructuring the vision: Teachers’ responses to the invitation to change. Research in Middle Level Education Quarterly, 27(2).
Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.) (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103, 1013-1055.
Gregory, S., Campbell, M., Knox, V., Dalgarno, B., Reiners, T., & Masters, Y. (2011). Changing directions through VirtualPREX: engaging pre-service teachers in virtual professional experience. Changing demands, changing directions: Proceedings of the Ascillete 2011 Conference, Hobart, pp. 491-501.
Grudnoff, Lexie (2011). Rethinking the practicum: Limitations and possibilities. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(3), 223-234.
Hertberg-Davis, H. L., & Brighton, C. M. (2006). Support and sabotage: Principal’s influence on middle school teachers’ responses to differentiation. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17, 90-102.
Joseph, S., Thomas, M., Simonette, G., and Ramsook, L. (2013). The impact of differentiated instruction in a teacher education setting: Successes and challenges. International Journal of Higher Education, 2 (3), 28-40.
Knopper, D. & Fertig, C. (2005). Differentiation for gifted children: It’s all about trust. The Illinois Association for Gifted Children Journal, 6(1), 6-8.
Marshall, C. & Rossman, G.B. (2010). Designing qualitative research (5th ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Parkinson, P.T. (2008). Field placement treatments: A comparative study. The Teacher Educator, 43(1), 29-45.
Smith, K., & Lev-Ari, L. (2005). The place of the practicum in pre-service teacher education: The voice of the students. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 33, 289-302.
Seperson, M. A., & Joyce, B. R. (1973). Teaching styles of student teachers as related to those of their cooperating teachers. Educational Leadership Research Supplement, 31(2), 146- 151.
Stokking, K., Leenders, F., de Jong, J., & van Tartwijk, J. (2003). From student to teacher: Reducing practice shock and early dropout in the teaching profession. European Journal of Teacher Education, 26, 329-351.
Tieso, C. (2004) Through the looking glass: One school’s reflections on differentiation. Gifted Child Today, 27(4), 58-65.
Tomlinson, C. A., & Imbeau, M. B. (2010). Leading and managing a differentiated classroom. Alexandria, Virginia: ASCD.
Van Tassel-Baska, J. (2006). A content analysis of evaluation findings across 20 gifted programs: A clarion call enhanced gifted program development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50,199-210.
Westberg, K. L. Archamjbault, F. X., Dobyns, S. M., & Salvin, T. J. (1993). The classroom practices observation study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 120-146.