Peace and Conflict: A Look at my Own Backyard
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1211.19656Keywords:
peace and conflict, autoethnography, victimology, transcultural psychology, institutional racism, systemic exclusion, non-Western worldviews, Ubuntu, global transitionAbstract
This article examines peace and conflict through the lens of an autobiographical “backyard,” arguing that global transitions—ecological, geopolitical, socio-economic, and cultural—must be understood not only at macro and meso levels but also through the intimate micro-dynamics of individual experience. Situated within contemporary scholarship that frames the present era as one of profound systemic transformation, the study extends the author’s earlier work on peace and resistance by employing a methodology of critical self-assessment, or autoethnography. Through six guiding questions, the article interrogates encounters with aggression, violence, sexual harassment, deprivation, institutional racism, DARVO, and conflict across the author’s life course, spanning childhood in Indonesia, migration to the Netherlands, academic and professional trajectories, political activism, and the impact of personal tragedy. These narratives are analyzed through frameworks drawn from victimology, transcultural psychology, and power relations, illuminating how institutional structures reproduce exclusion, hierarchy, and racialization while also revealing the author’s evolving strategies of resistance—from physical self-defense and ethical refusal to organizational leadership, whistleblowing, and advocacy for vulnerable groups, migrants, and refugees. The discussion contrasts Western individualistic models of power and masculinity with communitarian non-Western philosophies such as Ubuntu, arguing that durable peace requires integrating these divergent epistemologies. A heuristic conflict model, F(C | PF–LA–PE) = VVPB & NE, is proposed to conceptualize conflict as relational, contextual, and structurally embedded. Ultimately, the article demonstrates that personal histories of conflict mirror broader global patterns shaped by colonial legacies, systemic discrimination, and structural violence. It concludes that any credible pursuit of world peace must incorporate micro-level experience as both analytical foundation and normative guide, recognizing the inseparability of individual, societal, and global dimensions of conflict and transformation.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Carl Hermann Dino Steinmetz

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors wishing to include figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
