Flow Experiences across Multiple Performance Domains
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1207.18979Keywords:
flow, cognitive flow, performance, autotelic, intrinsic motivation, sportAbstract
As the construct of flow is currently under revision, the nine dimensions of the Jackson-Marsh Model of flow have been examined more closely. The current study aims to add to this examination by comparing these dimensions across four performance domains: academic, individual sport, spectator sport, and team sport. Participants completed two different flow assessments within one hour following their specified performance activity. One of the assessments measured state specific flow (FSS-2, Jackson & Marsh, 1996). A total of 118 performers participated: academic (n = 26), individual sport (n = 26), spectator sport (n = 32), and team sport (n = 34). Multivariate analysis of variance analyses conducted on the dimensions that represent antecedents of flow (challenge to skills match, clear goals, and unambiguous feedback) revealed less unambiguous feedback for the exam takers (academic) in comparison to the individual sport athletes, spectator sport athletes, and team sport athletes. A multivariate analysis of variance was then conducted comparing dimensions of the experience of flow between activity types. Individual sport athletes experienced higher levels of merging of action and awareness while spectator sport athletes experienced less loss of self-consciousness between the performance domains. Implications of these differences for the flow construct are discussed.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Kristin Mauldin, Bailey Thompson, Andrea Rubio, Yilena Betancourt, Gerardo Brana, Janeane Hernandez, Lindsey Gonzalez, Matthew Batherson, Rachael Lewin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors wishing to include figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
