Impact of the Critical Success Factors on International Development Projects in Mukalla, Yemen
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1205.18807Keywords:
Environmental factors, Project Planning and Execution, Success factors, YemenAbstract
The finance of International Development Projects in Yemen using Social Fund for Development (SFD), is bedeviled by a number of impediments. This study identified and measured the critical success factors in International Development Projects. The approach is quantitative; data was collected using 338 structured, closed-ended questionnaires. Relative Importance Index (RII) and PLS- SEM was used in the analysis. The findings revealed that: Project Planning and Execution, Construction Organizational Factors, Client and Stakeholder Engagement and Environmental Factors were identified as the most critical success factors. The Environmental Factors with (β = 0.410, t = 6.013, p < 0.05) accounted for the highest variation, while Project Planning and Execution with (β = 0.184, t = 3.664, p < 0.05) has the second highest prediction on the success of development projects in Yemen. The four exogenous variables predicted about 52% of the variation in the success in International Development Projects. It was recommended that environmental issues like political, economic, social, project location and size; and then project planning and execution issues like plan formulation, risk assessment and mitigation, monitoring, and commitment to meet quality, cost and time objectives deserve special attention.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Saleh Mohammed Mubarak Al-Bakri Al-Nasi, Sushilawati Binti Ismail, Riduan Bin Yunus

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors wishing to include figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
