NEGOTIATED ORDER IN TAX AUDIT OF CORPORATE TAX

Authors

  • Endang Sriningsih Politeknik SAKTI Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.33.1870

Keywords:

negotiated order, taxation, joint responsibility, deterrent effect, self assessment.

Abstract

Abstract

 

This study investigated the negotiations in taxation from the theoretical perspective of Anselm Strauss’ Negotiated Order, especially in the tax audit between Tax Auditors and Authorized Agents of Taxpayers in Surabaya, Gresik and Sidoarjo. Taxation in Indonesia applies a self-assessment system, so that taxpayers should play an active role to meet their tax compliance. However, since the system was adopted in 1984, and due to the outbreak of the issues of tax resistance, the awareness of taxpayers to meet their tax compliance has still been very low. Regarding this, the government adopts law enforcement by means of three main pillars: tax examination, investigation and collection.

The study resulted in the following findings. First, implementation of joint responsibility and counter data of transaction counterparties in the tax reporting could prevent negotiations between the Taxpayer and Tax Auditor. Second, Tax Auditor applies deterrent effect in the tax audit, which resulted in degrading the taxpayer’ position, and benefitting the Tax Auditor personally. This means that there has been a "win-lose" negotiation. Third, inter-institution negotiations took place, aimed at easing the tax burden of entrepreneurs.

In general, the results of this study strengthen as well as expand the negotiated order theory of Anselm Strauss, in that the structural context using a crisscrossing surveillance as an obligation between the parties that have the potential to negotiate can prevent negotiation. The negotiated order modes used in this study, namely avoidance, arrogance, influence of power, and compromise, can be added to a series of properties of Strauss’ negotiation context.

 

Key words: negotiated order, taxation, joint responsibility, deterrent effect, self assessment.

References

Arina, M.Zeti, dkk. 2013. Konsultan Pajak = Pencuri Pajak ?. Surabaya: Artha Raya.

Benson, J., and Day, R. 1976. On the Limits of Negotiation: A Critique of Theory of Negotiated Order. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association. New York.

Budi S, Prianto. 2014. Kupas Tuntas Akuntansi & Pajak Bisnis Properti. Jakarta: PT. Pratama Indomitra Konsultan.

_____________2014 Tips dan Trik Menghadapi Pemeriksaan/ Sengketa Pajak. Surabaya : IKPI Cabang Surabaya.

Bogdan, Robert dan Steven J. Taylor. (1993). Dasar-dasarPenelitian Kualitatif. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.

Borgatta, Edgar F. dan Rhonda J.V. Montgomery. (2000). Encyclopedia of Sociology, (Vol 1-5, second edition). New York : Macmillan Reference USA an imprint of The Gale Group 1633 Broadway, New York 10019.

Brotodiharjo, Santoso. 1998. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Pajak. Bandung: PT.Refika Aditama.

Bucher, R. 1970. Social Process and Power in Medical School.In M. Zald (Ed.).Power and Organization. Nashville, Tenn: Vanderbilt University Press.

__________and Strauss. 1961. "Professions in process "American Journal of Sociology 66, pg. 325-334

__________.1962. "Pathology a study of social movements within a profession " Social Problems 10, hal. 40-51

__________and Stelling .1969. “Characteristics of Professional Organization”, Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 10, page 3-15.

Busch. (1980). "Structure and negotiation in the agricultural sciences ", Rural Sociology 45, page. 26-48

Clark E., Moustakas. (1994). Fenomenological Reseach Methods. United States of America : Sage Publications Inc.

Colleman, James S.2008. Dasar-dasar Teori Sosial. Bandung: Nusa Media.( Translated from James S. Colleman. Foundation of Social Theority.The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. 1994.)

Covey, Stephen R. (1992). The Seven habits of highly effective people. Second edition , Publish by: Simon & Schuster

Creswell, John W. 1998. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design; Choosing Among Five Traditions. The United States of America : Sage Publication, Inc.

Denzin, N. 1992. Symbolic Interactionism and Cultural Studies. New York :

Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell.

_________1970. Interaction, Social Orders and Problematics in the American Liquor Industry. In N. Denzin (Ed.). Studies in Symbolic Interaction, in Press.

Giddens, Anthony, dan Jonathan Turner. (2008). Social Theory Today (translated), Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar.

Gunadi dkk. (1997). Perpajakan,jilid 1. Jakarta,Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi UI.

Joas, Hans. 1993. Pragmatism and Social Action. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

_________1996. The Creativity of Action. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

_________1983. The Intersubjective Constitution of The Body Image, Human Studies, 6, hal.197-204.intersection in the computing world. Symbolic Interaction. 1: 24-43.

Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia Direktorat Jenderal Pajak. (2010).Reformasi Pajak: Silent Revolution. Jakarta: Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia Direktorat Jenderal Pajak.

Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia Direktorat Jenderal Pajak Direktorat Penyuluhan Pelayanan dan Humas. 2011. Buku Panduan Bagi KPPN dan Bendahara Pemerintah sebagai Pemotong/Pemungut Pajak- Pajak Negara.

Kuper, Adam & Jessica Kuper. 2008. Ensiklopedi Ilmu-ilmu Sosial, Jakarta,

Rajagrafindo.

Kuswarno, Engkus. 2009. Metodologi Penelitian Komunikasi Fenomenologi. Bandung: Widya Pajajaran.

Maines, David R. 1977. Social organization and social structure in symbolic

interactionist thought, Annual Review of Sociology, 3, hal. 235-259

_______________(ed.).1978. Structural parameters and negotiated orders comment on Benson, and Day and Day " Social Quartely 19, hal. 491-496

_______________1979. "Mesostructure and social process " Contemporary Sociology 8, hal. 524-527

_______________(ed.).1982. In Search of Mesostructure : Studies in the Negotiated Order , Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 11: 267, Published by:sage

_______________(ed.).1982a. Issues in Negotiated Order, Special Issues of Urban Life11 Oktober, hal. 267-279

_______________and Joseph Palenski. 1986. Reconstructive Legitimacy in Final Reports of Contract Reports. Sociologocal Review.34:573-589.

_______________,Noreen Sugrue, and Michael Katovich. (1983). ‘‘The Sociological Import of G. H. Mead’s Theory of the Past.’’ American Sociological Review 48:151–173.

Manning, Philips. 1977. "Rules in organizational context narcotics law enforcement in two settings " Social Quarterly 18 44-61

Mead, George Herbert. (1934). Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Norman K,-Yvonna S. Lincoln. (2009). Handbook of Qualitative Research (edisi Bahasa Indonesia). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

O'Toole dan O'Toole. (1981). "Negotiating interorganizational orders " Social Quarterly 22, hal.29-41

Powell, W. W. 1985. The Institutionalization of Rational Organizations. Contemporary Sociology. 14: 564-566.

Pujileksono, Sugeng. 2012. Total Negotiated Order di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan (Studi Fenomenologitentang Pengalaman Petugas dan Narapidana dalam Negotiated Order di Lembaga pemasyarakatan Klas I Lowokwaru Malang). Surabaya: Disertasi,Universitas Airlangga.

Rosdiana, H., & Tarigan. 2005. Perpajakan: Teori dan Aplikasi. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Schutz, A. 1962. The Problem of Social Reality. The Hague : Martinus Nijhoff.

________. 1964. Studies in Social Theory. The Hague : Martinus Nijhoff.

________. 1967. The Phenomenology of The Social World, translated by George Wals and Frederick Lehnert . Northwestern University Press.

________, and Luckmann,T. 1974. The Structure of The Life World. London : Heinemann.

Sheff J., Thomas. (1968). Negotiating Reality: Notes on Power in the assessment of Responsibility, Social Problems16 (Summer) : 3-17.

Stelling, J dan Bucher,R. (1972). “Autonomy and monitoring on hospital wards”,

Social Quarterly 13, 431-446

Strauss, Anselm. 1978. Negosiations: Varieties, Contexts, Processes, and Social Order, San Fransisco : Jossey-Bass.

______________.1970. Discovering New Theory from Previous Theory. In T. Shibutani (Ed.).

______________.1970.Human Nature and Collective Behavior. Englewood Cliffs. N.Y. : Prentice - Hall.

_______________and others. 1964. Psychiatric Ideologies and Institution. New York : Free Press.

_______________1959. Mirrors and Masks: The Search for Identity. Glencoe, Illinoiss, Free Press

Stryker, Sheldon. (1980). Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version. Menlo Park, California: Benjamin/ Cummings.

Thomas, Jim. 1983. Negotiated order in maximum security prisons social interaction as mediating activity and loose coupling . Departemen of Sociology, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60115.

____________1983. Justice as interaction: Loose Coupling and Mediations in the Advisory Process. Symbolic Interaction.7: 213-231.

Turner, S. Bryan. 2006. The Cambridge Dictionary of Sociology. New York : Cambridge University Press.

______________. 2012. Teori Sosial Klasik Sampai Post Modern. Jakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.

Pidato Presiden RI pada penyampaian pengantar/ keterangan Pemerintah atas Rencana Undang-undang tentang APBN tahun 2010 beserta nota keuangannya.

Harian Bisnis Indonesia, dalam berita pajak, pajak.go.id. Desember 2009

Harian Tempo, dalam berita pajak, pajak.go.id. Desember 2009.

Antara News, Senin, 22 Maret 2010

Tempo-interaktif, 29 Maret 2010, pukul 17.53.

Inilah.com, Jakarta. 28 Feb 2012, 12.10

Jakarta, Kompas.com 30 Juli2012 12.06 pm

Kompas.com. Jum’at 17 Agustus 2012, 09.32.

Surat Ketua REI Jatim No. 90/PEM/03/K-S/V../2014, tanggal 24 November 2014 yang ditujukan kepada seluruh anggotanya.

www.pajak.go.id. Tax Glossary, 2008

Legislation and Regulations

www.ortax.org. Surat Edaran Direktur Jenderal Pajak Nomor: SE-60/PJ/2010, tertanggal 05 Mei 2010 , Tentang Penggalian Potensi Berbasis Profile WP Dan Benchmark.

_______________Surat Edaran Direktur Jenderal Pajak Nomor: SE - 39/PJ/2011, Tentang Rasio Pembetulan SPT Tahunan Pajak Penghasilan Berbasis Profil Wajib Pajak Pada Tahun 2011.

_______________Peraturan Direktur Jenderal Pajak Nomor: PER-04/PJ/2012, Tanggal 3 Februari 2012,Tentang Pedoman Penggunaan Metode dan Teknik Pemeriksaan Untuk Menguji Kepatuhan Pemenuhan Kewajiban Perpajakan.

_______________Surat Edaran Direktur Jenderal Pajak Nomor : SE-28/PJ/2013, Tanggal 11 Juni 2013, Tentang Kebijakan Pemeriksaan.

_______________Surat Edaran Direktur Jenderal Pajak Nomor : SE-15/PJ/2014, Tanggal 21 Maret 2014.

Downloads

Published

2016-03-12

How to Cite

Sriningsih, E. (2016). NEGOTIATED ORDER IN TAX AUDIT OF CORPORATE TAX. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.33.1870