Main Article Content
Authentic education system highlighted in this paper provides a unique learning experience to individual learners, specifically by addressing their psychological and neurological needs; assessment of learners are done through generic attributes that have more validity and relates to intrinsic learner characteristics, lasting throughout the life span. The psychological types or conscious functions defined in analytical psychology provide additional insights into learner classification and identifying appropriate generic attributes. . In the authentic education system described, learners are encouraged to pursue higher-order learning sending them through a complete learning cycle; this engages learners deeply to the task and provides a lasting experience, enabling individuals to reach their full potential. Learners are encouraged to pursue an individuation process as described in analytical psychology towards a higher level of human development; that is the shadow or the inferior functions are directly addressed enabling the path towards the concept of the self. Through authentic education, we get to value human resources much more than related economic aspects, making a significant difference to our current approaches and focus; it has the promise to effect a significant positive social change towards a sustainable development. In this regard, the viewpoints from analytical psychology as a framework of human development provide additional justifications.
Authors wishing to include figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
2. Beale, R. and Jackson, T. 1990. Neural Computing – An Introduction. Institute of Physics Publishing.
3. Beebe, J. (2006). Psychological Types. In R. K. Papadopoulos (Ed.) The Handbook of Jungian Psychology – Theory, Practice and Applications. Sussex, UK: Routledge.
4. Biggs, J. and Tang, C. 2011. Teaching for Quality Learning at University (4th ed.). Berkshire: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
5. Casement, A. (2006). The Shadow. In R. K. Papadopoulos (Ed.) The Handbook of Jungian Psychology –
Theory, Practice and Applications. Sussex, UK: Routledge.
6. Colman, W. (2006). The Self. In R. K. Papadopoulos (Ed.) The Handbook of Jungian Psychology – Theory,
Practice and Applications. Sussex, UK: Routledge.
7. Dabrowski, K. (with Kawczak A. and Piechowski M. M.). 1970. Mental Growth through Positive Disintegration. London: Gryf Publications
8. Dabrowski, K. 1972. Psychoneuroses Is Not An Illness. London: Gryf Publications
9. Dabrowski, K. 1977. Theory of Levels of Emotional Development (vol 1) – Multilevelness and Positive Disintegration. New York: Dabor Science Publications.
10. Diamond, M. C. (1996) ‘The Brain . . . Use It or Lose It’, New Horizons for Learning: School of Education, Johns Hopkins University. Retrieved from http://education.jhu.edu/PD/newhorizons/Neurosciences/articles/
11. Diamond, M. C. (2001) ‘Response of the Brain to Enrichment’, New Horizons for Learning: School of Education, Johns Hopkins University. Retrieved from http://education.jhu.edu/PD/newhorizons/Neurosciences/articles/
12. Entwistle, N. J. 1998. Approaches to Learning and Forms of Understanding. In Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, ed. B. Dart and G. Boulton-Lewis, 72–101. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research
13. Hauke, C. (2006). The Unconscious – Personal and collective. In R. K. Papadopoulos (Ed.) The Handbook of Jungian Psychology – Theory, Practice and Applications. Sussex, UK: Routledge.
14. Kolb, D. 1983. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, Prentice Hall.
15. Maslow, A. 1968. Toward a Psychology of Being. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
16. Maslow, A. 1993. Farther Reaches of Human Nature. New York, N.Y., U.S.A.: Arkana.
17. Paul, R. and Elder, L. 2000. Critical Thinking - Tools for Taking Charge of Your Learning and Your Life. Pearson Education.
18. Ramsden, P. 2003. Learning to Teach in Higher Education(2nd ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
19. Silverman, L.K. 1998. Personality and Learning Styles of Gifted Children. In Excellence In Educating Gifted & Talented Learners (3rd ed), ed. Van Tassel – Baska, Denver, Colorado, USA: Love Publishing Company.
20. Silverman, L. K. 2002. Upside-Down Brilliance: The Visual-Spatial Learner, Denver: DeLeon Publishing.
21. Silverman, L. K. 2004. At- Risk Youth and the Creative Process. Paper presented at ARTernatives for At-Risk Youth Conference, May 14, Colorado Springs.
22. Stevens, A. (2006). The Archetypes. In R. K. Papadopoulos (Ed.) The Handbook of Jungian Psychology –
Theory, Practice and Applications. Sussex, UK: Routledge.
23. Watagodakumbura, C. (2013a). Authentic education: visualising education in a deeper perspective. World Journal of Education, Sciedu Press, 3(3), 1-10. Retrieved from http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/wje/article/view/2725.
24. Watagodakumbura, C. (2013b). Education from a Deeper and Multidisciplinary Perspective – To a Sustainable Development of a Neurodiverse Society – A Futuristic View, Xlibris
25. Webb, J.T. (with Amend E. R., Webb N.E., Goerss J., Beljan P, and Olenchak F.R.) 2005. Misdiagnosis and Dual Diagnoses of Gifted Children and Adults: ADHD, Bipolar, Ocd, Asperger's, Depression, and Other Disorders. Great Potential Press
26. Webb, J. T. 2008. Dabrowski’s Theory and Existential Depression in Gifted Children and Adults. Paper presented at the Eighth International Congress of the Institute for Positive Disintegration in Human Development, August 7-9, Alberta, Canada.
27. Zull, J. E. 2002. The Art of Changing the Brain: Enriching the Practice of Teaching by Exploring the Biology of Learning. Stylus Publishing.